References
- Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Gonçalves J de M, Sparovek G. 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22: 711–728. doi: https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
- Assmann E. 1970. The Principles of Forest Yield Study: Studies in the Organic Production, Structure, Increment and Yield of Forest Stands. Elsevier.
- Baptista FRCB, Ataíde DHS, Rocha PV, Silva LC, Araújo EJG, et al. 2019. Stratification in the adjustment of hypsometric relationship models in forest fragment. Scientific Electronic Archives 12(6): 52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36560/1262019928
- Bettinger P, Boston K, Siry JP, Grebner DL. 2016. Forest management and planning. New York: Academic press.
- Binkley D, Campoe OC, Alvares C, Carneiro RL, Cegatta Í, Stape JL. 2017. The interactions of climate, spacing and genetics on clonal Eucalyptus plantations across Brazil and Uruguay. Forest Ecology and Management 405: 271–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.050
- Binoti DHB, Binoti MLM da S, Leite HG. 2012. Aplicação da função hiperbólica na construção de curvas de índice de local. Revista Árvore 36(4): 741–746. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622012000400015
- Binoti DHB, Binoti MLM da S, Leite HG. 2015. Modelagem da distribuição diamétrica de povoamentos equiâneos de eucalipto utilizando a função logística generalizada. Revista Árvore 39(4): 707–711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-67622015000400013
- Burkhart HE, Tomé M. 2012. Modelling Forest Trees and Stands. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.
- Calegario N, Lelis C, Calegario C, Maestri R, Daniels R. 2005. Melhoria da qualidade de ajuste de modelos biométricos florestais pelo emprego da teoria dos modelos não lineares generalizados (Improving fitting quality of forest biometric models by applying the generalized nonlinear model theory). Scientia Forestalis 69: 38–50.
- Campos JCC, Leite HG. 2017. Mensuração florestal: perguntas e respostas (5 edição). Viçosa: UFV.
- Carvalho S de PC, Calegario N, Silva FF, Borges LAC, de Mendonça AR, de Lima MP. 2011. Modelos não lineares generalizados aplicados na predição da área basal e volume de Eucalyptus clonal. Cerne 17(4): 541–548. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-77602011000400013
- Castro R, Soares C, Leite H, Souza A, Nogueira G, Martins F. 2013. Individual growth model for eucalyptus stands in Brazil using artificial neural network. ISRN Forestry 2013: 196832. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/196832
- Clutter JL. 1963. Compatible growth and yield models for loblolly pine. Forest Science 9: 354–371.
- Corona P, Scotti R, Tarchiani N. 1998. Relationship between environmental factors and site index in Douglas-fir plantations in central Italy. Forest Ecology and Management 110(1): 195–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00281-3
- Cosenza D, Leite H, Marcatti G, Binoti D, Alcântara A, Rode R. 2015. Site classification with support vector machine and artificial neural network. Scientia Forestalis/Forest Sciences 43: 955–963.
- Cosenza DN, Soares AAV, Alcântara AEM de, Silva AAL da, Rode R, et al. 2017. Site classification for eucalypt stands using artificial neural network based on environmental and management features. CERNE 23(3): 310–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201723032352
- Embrapa portal. Correlação com WRB/FAO e Soil Taxonomy. [accessed 2021 May 20]. https://www.embrapa.br/solos/sibcs/correlacao-com-wrb-fao-e-soil-taxonomy
- Farias AA, Soares CPB, Leite HG, da Silva GF. 2021. Quantile regression: prediction of growth and yield for a eucalyptus plantation in northeast Brazil. European Journal of Forest Research 22(3): 250–256.
- Flexas J, Bota J, Escalona JM, Sampol B, Medrano H. 2002. Effects of drought on photosynthesis in grapevines under field conditions: an evaluation of stomatal and mesophyll limitations. Functional Plant Biology 29(4): 461–471. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1071/pp01119
- Girona MM, Rossi S, Lussier J-M, Walsh D, Morin H. 2017. Understanding tree growth responses after partial cuttings: A new approach. PLOS ONE 12(2): e0172653. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172653
- Gonçalves JC, Carvalho S de PC e, Oliveira AD de, Gomide LR. 2016. Comparação dos modelos prognósticos de Clutter e da função Logística. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira 36(87): 311–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4336/2016.pfb.36.87.1230
- Gonçalves JL de M, Alvares CA, Behling M, Alves JM, Pizzi GT, Angeli A. 2014. Produtividade de plantações de eucalipto manejadas nos sistemas de alto fuste e talhadia, em função de fatores edafoclimáticos. Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. [Internet]. Available at http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/handle/doc/1005140 [accessed 11 May 2021].
- González-García M, Hevia A, Majada J, Calvo de Anta R, Barrio-Anta M. 2015. Dynamic growth and yield model including environmental factors for Eucalyptus nitens (Deane & Maiden) Maiden short rotation woody crops in Northwest Spain. New Forests 46(3): 387–407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-015-9467-7
- Haakana H, Heikkinen J, Katila M, Kangas A. 2019. Efficiency of post-stratification for a large-scale forest inventory—case Finnish NFI. Annals of Forest Science 76(1): 9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0795-6
- Hunter IR, Gibson AR. 1984. Predicting Pinus radiata site index from environmental variables. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 14(1): 53–64.
- IBÁ (Indústria brasileira de árvores). 2019. Relatório IBÁ 2019. Available at https://www.iba.org/datafiles/publicacoes/relatorios/iba-relatorioanual2019.pdf Accessed 10 October 2021.
- Katila M, Tomppo E. 2001. Selecting estimation parameters for the Finnish multisource National Forest Inventory. Remote Sensing of Environment 76(1): 16–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00188-7
- Kitikidou K, Petrou P, Milios E. 2012. Dominant height growth and site index curves for Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) in central Cyprus. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16(2): 1323–1329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.10.010
- Kramer PJ, Kozlowski TT. 1960. Physiology of trees. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Inc.
- Leite HG, Andrade VCL de. 2003. Importância das variáveis altura dominante e altura total em equações hipsométricas e volumétricas. Revista Árvore 27(3): 301–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622003000300005
- Leite HG, de Oliveira-Neto RR, Monte MA, Fardin L, de Alcantara AM. 2011. Modelo de afilamento de cerne de Tectona grandis L.f. Scientia Forestalis 39(89): 8.
- Machado S do A, Zamin NT, Nascimento RGM, Santos AAP dos. 2014. Efeito de variáveis climáticas no crescimento mensal de Pinus taeda e Araucaria angustifolia em fase juvenil. Floresta e Ambiente 21(2): 170–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4322/floram.2014.015
- Miranda ROV, Dias AN, Filho AF, Soares ID, Cruz JP. 2015. Modelagem do crescimento e produção em classes de precipitação pluviométrica para Eucalyptus sp. Floresta 45(1): 117–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v45i1.33664
- Oliveira MLR de, Leite HG, Nogueira GS, Campos JCC. 2009. Modelagem e prognose em povoamentos não desbastados de clones de eucalipto. Revista Árvore 33(5): 841–852. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622009000500007
- Parresol BR, Devall MS. 2013. Patterns of diametric growth in stem-analyzed laurel trees (Cordia alliodora) in a Panamanian forest. The Southwestern Naturalist 58(2): 170–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1894/0038-4909-58.2.170
- Penido TMA, Lafetá BO, Nogueira GS, Alves PH, Gorgens EB, Oliveira MLR de. 2020. Modelos de crescimento e produção para a estimativa volumétrica em povoamentos comerciais de eucalipto. Scientia Forestalis 48(128): e3340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v48n128.06
- Rayner ME. 1992. Evaluation of six site classifications for modelling timber yield of regrowth karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor F. Muell.). Forest Ecology and Management 54(1): 315–336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(92)90020-A
- Retslaff FA de S, Figueiredo Filho A, Dias AN, Bernett LG, Figura MA, et al. 2015. Curvas de sítio e relações hipsométricas para Eucalyptus grandisna região dos campos gerais, Paraná. Cerne, 21(2): 219–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201521021349
- Rossi S, Morin H, Tremblay M-J. 2010. Growth and productivity of black spruce (Picea mariana) belonging to the first cohort in stands within and north of the commercial forest in Quebec, Canada. Annals of Forest Science 67(8): 807–807. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010043
- Roveda M, Dias AN, Figueiredo Filho A, Scavinski V, Castro R. 2016. Testes de identidade de modelos aplicados na construção de curvas de índices de local e na produção de povoamentos de Eucalyptus grandis. Scientia Forestalis 44(109): 115–127. doi: https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v44n109.11
- Salles TT, Leite HG, Oliveira Neto SN de, Soares CPB, Paiva HN de, Santos FL dos. 2012. Modelo de Clutter na modelagem de crescimento e produção de eucalipto em sistemas de integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 47(2): 253–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2012000200014
- Sanquetta C, Weber S, Formagini F, Barbeiro L, Vieira G. 2010. Equaçoes individuais e determinçao de classes de crescimento para Nectandra grandiflora nees a partir de dados de análise de tronco. Scientia Agraria 11(1): 1–8. 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5380/rsa.v11i1.16071
- Santos ACA, Silva S, Leite HG, Cruz JP da. 2017. Influência da variabilidade edafoclimática no crescimento de clones de eucalipto no Nordeste baiano. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira 37(91): 259–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4336/2017.pfb.37.91.1207
- Schikowski AB, Corte APD, Sanquetta CR. 2013. Modelagem do crescimento e de biomassa individual de Pinus. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira 33(75): 269–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4336/2013.pfb.33.75.503
- Scolforo HF, de Castro Neto F, Scolforo JRS, Burkhart H, McTague JP, et al. 2016. Modelling dominant height growth of eucalyptus plantations with parameters conditioned to climatic variations. Forest Ecology and Management 380: 182–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.001
- Scolforo J, Maestri R, Ferraz Filho A, Mello J, Oliveira A, Assis A. 2013. Dominant height model for site classification of Eucalyptus grandis incorporating climatic variables. International Journal of Forestry Research 2013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/139236
- Scolforo HF, McTague JP, Burkhart H, Roise J, Alvares CA, Stape JL. 2019. Modelling whole-stand survival in clonal eucalypt stands in Brazil as a function of water availability. Forest Ecology and Management 432: 1002–1012. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.044
- Scolforo JRS, Thiersch. 2006. Biometria florestal: modelos de crescimento e produção florestal. Lavras, MG: UFLA/FAEPE.
- Selle GL, Pauleski DT, Braz EM. 2008. Como Classificar Sítios Florestais Através da Altura Dominante do Povoamento. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas.
- Silva G, Silva C, Calegario N, Silva A, Cruz J, Leite H. 2018. Site index curves in thinned and non-thinned eucalyptus stands. Forest Ecology and Management 408: 36-44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.036
- Silva WS, Fernandes FA, Muniz FR, Muniz JA, Fernandes TJ. 2021. Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla growth curve in different site classifications, considering residual autocorrelation. Revista brasileira de biometria 39(1): 122–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28951/rbb.v39i1.511
- Silveira EMO, Espírito Santo FD, Wulder MA, Acerbi Júnior FW, Carvalho MC, et al. 2019. Pre-stratified modelling plus residuals kriging reduces the uncertainty of aboveground biomass estimation and spatial distribution in heterogeneous savannas and forest environments. Forest Ecology and Management 445: 96–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.016
- Soares C, Leite H. 2000. Predição da produção de madeira de eucalipto em região com alta variabilidade pluviométrica (Eucalypt timber wood prediction in region with high pluviometric variability). Scientia Forestales 58: 41–48.
- Soares C, Leite H, Oliveira M, Carvalho A. 2004. Especificação de um modelo de crescimento e produção florestal. Revista Árvore. 28:831-837 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622004000600007
- Soares P, Tomé M, Skovsgaard JP, Vanclay JK. 1995. Evaluating a growth model for forest management using continuous forest inventory data. Forest Ecology and Management 71(3): 251–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)06105-R
- Vanclay JK. 1994. Sustainable timber harvesting: simulation studies in the tropical rainforests of north Queensland. Forest Ecology and Management 69(1): 299–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)90237-2
- Weber VP, Finger CAG, Fleig FD, de Souza CAM, Munareto FF, da Silva LT de M. 2013. Diretrizes para desbaste de Pinus taeda L. em função da altura dominante. Ciência Florestal 23(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5902/198050988453
- Weiskittel AR, Hann DW, Kershaw Jr JA, Vanclay JK. 2011. Forest growth and yield modelling. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
- Winsor CP. 1932. The Gompertz Curve as a growth curve. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 18(1): 1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.18.1.1