Facilitation and Assessment of Group Work using Web-based Tools

References

• ChengW. and WarrenM. (2000) Making a difference: using peers to assess individual students’ contributions to a group project. Teaching in Higher Education, 5 (2), 243-256
   Google Scholar
• ConwayR., KemberD., SivanA. and WuM. (1993) Peer Assessment of an individual’s contribution to a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18 (1), 45-54
   Google Scholar
• EarlS.E. (1986) Staff and peer assessment - measuring an individual’s contribution to group performance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(1), 60-69
   Google Scholar
• EntwhistleN and RamsdenP. (1983) Understanding Student Learning. London, UK: Croom Helm
   Google Scholar
• FalchikovN. (1986) Product Comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self-assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11 (2), 146-166
   Google Scholar
• GarrisonD.R., AndersonT. and ArcherW. (2000) Critical inquiry in a text based environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2-3), 1-19
   Google Scholar
• GibbsG., HabeshawS. and HabeshawT. (1986) 53 Interesting Ways to assess your Students. Bristol Technical and Educational Services.
   Google Scholar
• GoldfinchJ. (1994) Further development in peer assessment of group projects. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 19 (1), 29-35
   Google Scholar
• GoldfinchJ. and RaesideR. (1990) Development of a Peer Assessment Technique for Obtaining Individual Marks on a Group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15 (3), 210-231
   Google Scholar
• GunawardenaC.N., LoweN.A. and AndersonT. (1997) Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17 (4), 397-431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaraN. and KlingR. (2000) Students’ Distress with a Web-based Distance Education Course: An Ethnographic Study of Participants’ Experiences http://www.slis.indiana.edu/CSI/WP/wp00-01.html (accessed 18 May 2004)
   Google Scholar
• HenriR. (1992) Computer Conferencing and Content analysis. In Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing, ed KayeA.R. p.117-136 Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag
   Google Scholar
• JaquesD. (2000) Learning in Groups, 3rd Edition. London, UK: Kogan Page
   Google Scholar
• LallyV. (2000) Analysing Teaching and Learning Interactions in a Networked Collaborative Learning Environment: issues and work in progress. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Edinburgh. Available at http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001648.htm(accessed 18 May 2004)
   Google Scholar
• LejkM. and WyvillM. (1996) A Survey of methods of deriving individual grades from group assessments. Evaluation in Higher Education, 21 (3), 267-281
   Google Scholar
• LiL.K.Y. (2001) Some Refinements on Peer Assessment of Group Projects. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 (1), 5-18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MasonR. (1991). Moderating Educational Computer Conferencing. The Distance Education Online Symposium News, 1 (19), available at http://www.emoderators.com/papers/mason.html (accessed 18 May 2004)
   Google Scholar
• MasonR. and BacsichP. (1998) Embedding Computer Conferencing into University Teaching. Computers in Education, 30, (3-4), 249-258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NewmanD.R., WebbB. and CochraneC. (1995) A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology Journal, 3 (2), 56-77. Available online at http://www.helsinki.fi/science/optek/ (accessed 18 May 2004)
   Google Scholar
• NewmanD.R. JohnsonC., WebbB. and CochraneC. (1997) Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported cooperative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (6), 484-495. Available online at http://www.qub.ac.uk/mgt/papers/jasis/jasis.html (accessed 18 May 2004)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OrsmondP., MerryS. and ReilingK. (1996) Importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21 (3), 239-250
   Google Scholar
• PoppingR. (2000) Computer assisted text analysis. London, UK: Sage
   Google Scholar
• RaceP. (2001) The Lecturer’s Toolkit A Practical Guide to Learning, Teaching and Assessment, second edition. London, UK: Kogan Page
   Google Scholar
• ResnickL., LevineJ. and TeasleyS. (eds) (1991) Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 384-397). Washington, USA: American Psychological Association
   Google Scholar
• SalmonG. (2000) E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online. London, UK: Kogan Page
   Google Scholar
• SockettR.E. (1999) Learning about bacterial pathogens via a fictional bio-warfare situation. Society for General Microbiology Conference, Edinburgh
   Google Scholar
• StefaniL.A.J. (1994) Peer, Self and tutor assessment relative reliabilities. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 19 (1), 69-75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VygotskyL.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar