Peripartum hysterectomy and cesarean delivery: a population-based study

References

• Whiteman MK, Kuklina E, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Meikle SF, Posner SF, Incidence and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1486–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a prospective study in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;124:187–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forna F, Miles AM, Jamieson DJ. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a comparison of cesarean and postpartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1440–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelsen IB, Albrechtsen S, Iversen OE. Peripartum hysterectomy-incidence and maternal morbidity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:409–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodelon C, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Schiff MA, Reed SD. Factors associated with peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:115–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, Brocklehurst P. Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:97–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jou HJ, Hung HW, Ling PY, Chen SM, Wu SC. Peripartum hysterectomy in Taiwan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;101:269–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, Donner A, Wojdyla D, Faundes A, Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2007;335:1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EURO-PERISTAT project, with SCPE, EUROCAT, EURONEOSTAT European Perinatal Health Report, 2008. Available online at: http://www.europeristat.com.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Demographic trends. In UNDP Human Development Report 2007/2008. New York: Palgrave MacMillian, 2008. pp. 243–6.
   Google Scholar
• Baldi I, Vicari P, Di CD, Zanetti R, Pagano E, Rosato R, A high positive predictive value algorithm using hospital administrative data identified incident cancer cases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:373–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spolaore P, Brocco S, Fedeli U, Visentin C, Schievano E, Avossa F, Measuring accuracy of discharge diagnoses for a region-wide surveillance of hospitalized strokes. Stroke. 2005;36:1031–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daltveit AK, Tollanes MC, Pihlstrom H, Irgens LM. Cesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:1327–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:340–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantini MP, Stivanello E, Frammartino B, Barone AP, Fusco D, Dallolio L, Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony. BMC Health Services Research. 2006;6:100.
   Google Scholar
• Steenland K, Armstrong B. An overview of methods for calculating the burden of disease due to specific risk factors. Epidemiology. 2006;17:512–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stata/IC 10.1 2009 Stata®Statacorp LP 4905 Lakeway Drive, College Station, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Glaze S, Ekwalanga P, Roberts G, Lange I, Birch C, Rosengarten A, Peripartum hysterectomy: 1999 to 2006. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:732–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakse A, Weber T, Nickelsen C, Jørgen N Secher. Peripartum hysterectomy in Denmark 1995–2004. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:1472–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baronciani D, Basevi V, Battaglia S, Lupi C, Perrone E, Simoni S, La nascita in Emilia Romagna. V rapporto sui dati del certificato di assistenza al parto (CEDAP)-anno 2007. [V report on the data concerning the certificate of delivery care, 2007]. (in Italian) Bologna: Regione Emilia Romagna, 2008 Italian Available online at: http://www.regione.emilia-romagna.it/sas/cedap/pubblicazioni.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wingprawat S, Chittacharoen A, Suthutvoravut S. Risk factors for emergency peripartum cesarean hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;90:136–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacmar J, Bhimani L, Boyd M, Shah-Hosseini R, Peipert J. Route of delivery as a risk factor for emergent peripartum hysterectomy: a case-control study. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:141–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David M, Gross MM, Wiemer A, Pachaly J, Vetter K. Prior cesarean section – an acceptable risk for vaginal delivery at free-standing midwife-led birth centers? Results of the analysis of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) in German birth centers. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;142:106–10.
   Google Scholar
• Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Porter TF, Luthy DA, Comstock CH, Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1039–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1071–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farchi S, Di Lallo D, Franco F, Polo A, Lucchini R, Calzolari F, Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery in a population-based study of low-risk pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:729–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuklina EV, Meikle SF, Jamieson DJ, Whiteman MK, Barfield WD, Hillis SD, Severe obstetric morbidity in the United States: 1998–2005. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:293–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar