Comparison of gestational sac volume by 3D-sonography using planimetric, virtual organ computer-aided analysis and extended imaging virtual organ computer-aided analysis methods between 7 and 11 weeks of pregnancy

References

• Jurkovic D, Gruboeck K, Campbell S. Ultrasound features in normal early pregnancy development. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1995;7:493–504.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley B, Harlow BL, Laboda LA, Benacerraf BR. Small sac size in the first trimester: a predictor of poor fetal outcome. Radiology. 1991;178:375–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falco P, Milano V, Pilu G, David C, Grisolia G, Rizzo N, Sonography of pregnancies with first-trimester bleeding and a viable embryo: a study of prognostic indicators by logistic regression analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;7:165–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulic M, Vrtar M. Ultrasonic planimetry of the gestation sac as biometric method in early pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound. 1978;6:228–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steiner H, Gregg AR, Bogner G, Graf AH, Weiner CP, Staudach A. First-trimester three-dimensional ultrasound volumetry of the gestational sac. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1994;255:165–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller T, Sutterlin M, Pohls U, Dietl J. Transvaginal volumetry of first-trimester gestational sac: a comparison of conventional with three-dimensional ultrasound. J Perinatal Med. 2000;28:214–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Babinszki A, Nyari T, Jordan S, Nasseri A, Mukherjee T, Copperman AB. Three-dimensional measurement of gestational and yolk sac volumes as predictors of pregnancy outcome in the first trimester. Am J Perinatol. 2001;18:203–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine-Fenning NJ, Clewes JS, Kendall NR, Bunkheila AK, Campbell BK, Johnson IR. The interobserver reliability and validity of volume calculation from three-dimensional ultrasound datasets in the in vitro setting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:283–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruano R, Martinovic J, Dommergues M, Aubry MC, Dumez Y, Benachi A. Accuracy of fetal lung volume assessed by three-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:725–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcon O, Wegrzyn P, Faro C, Peralta CF, Nicolaides KH. Gestational sac volumes measured by three-dimensional ultrasound at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation: relation to chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:546–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, Powell M, Balasubramaniam M, Gonçalves LF, Quantitative and morphological assessment of early gestational sacs using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:255–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guimarães Filho HA, da Costa LL, Araujo Junior E, Pires CR, Nardozza LM, Mattar R. XI VOCAL (eXtended Imaging VOCAL): a new modality for three-dimensional sonographic volume measurement. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;276:95–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheong KB, Leung KY, Chan HY, Lee YP, Yang F, Tang MH. Comparison of inter- and intraobserver agreement between three types of fetal volume measurement technique (XI VOCAL, VOCAL and multiplanar). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:287–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi CS, Lyons EA, Zheng XH, Lindsay DJ, Holt SC. Endovaginal US: demonstration of cardiac activity in embryos of less than 5.0 mm in crown-rump length. Radiology. 1990;176:71–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf RZ, Naeem R. Cytogenetic abnormalities in products of conception: a relationship revisited. AM J Reprod Immunol. 2004;52:88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Girardi G, Salmon JB. The role of complement in pregnancy and fetal loss. Autoimmunity. 2003;36:19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho FN, Chen SN, Tai MH, Yang TL. The quality and size of yolk sac in early pregnancy loss. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;46:413–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccaro H, Amor F, Leyton M, Sepulveda W. Arrhythmia in early pregnancy: a predictor of first-trimester pregnancy loss. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:248–51.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna KM, Feldstein VA, Goldstein RB, Filly RA. The empty amnion: a sign of early pregnancy failure. J Ultrasound Med. 1995;14:117–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley B, Harlow BL, Laboda LA, Benacerraf BR. Small sac size in the first trimester: a predictor of poor fetal outcome. Radiology. 1991;178:375–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Figueras F, Torrents M, Muñoz A, Comas C, Antolin E, Echevarria M, Three-dimensional yolk and gestational sac volume: a prospective study of prognostic value. J Reprod Med. 2003;48:252–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak PM, Nardozza LM, Araujo E Jr, Rolo LC, Moron AF. Comparison of placental volume in early pregnancy using multiplanar and VOCAL methods. Placenta. 2008;29:241–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kusanovic JP, Nien JK, Gonçalves LF, Espinoza J, Lee W, Balasubramaniam M, The use of inversion mode and 3D manual segmentation in volume measurement of fetal fluid-filled structures: comparison with Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:177–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousian M, Verwoerd-Dikkeboom CM, Koning AHJ, Hop WC, van der Spek PJ, Exalto N, Early pregnancy volume measurements: validation of ultrasound techniques and new perspectives. BJOG. 2009;116:278–85.
   Google Scholar