Cytological Diagnosis of Endometrial Disorders with A Brush Technique

References

• Abramson D., Driscoll S. G. Endometrial aspiration biopsy. Obstet Gynec 1966; 27: 381
   Google Scholar
• Ayre J. E. Rotating endometrial brush: new technique for the diagnosis of fundal carcinoma. Obstet Gynec 1955; 5: 137
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach W., Soost H.-J. Advantages and disadvantages of intra-uterine brush technique for endometrial cytology. Acta Cytol 1958; 2: 575
   Google Scholar
• Boschann H.-W. Zytometrie der Endometriumzellen. Arch Gynäk 1957; 189: 516
   Google Scholar
• Boschann H.-W. Cytometry on normal and abnormal endometrial cells. Acta Cytol 1958; 2: 520
   Google Scholar
• Burns E. L., Hartung W. H., Brittingham E. Studies of early uterine carcinomas discovered by cytological examination of the vaginal contents. Arch Pathol 1950; 50: 699
   Google Scholar
• Cary W. H. A method of obtaining endometrial smears for study of the cellular content. Amer J Obstet Gynec 1943; 46: 422
   Google Scholar
• Chatfield W. R., Watson A. A. Diagnosis of intrauterine disease by sponge biopsy technique. Lancet 1970; 1: 21
   Google Scholar
• Clyman M. J. Cannula aspirators for vaginal, endo-cervical and endometrial cytology. Obstet Gynec 1955; 6: 258
   Google Scholar
• Czernobilsky B., Garcia C.-R., Wallach E. E. Endometrial histology and parenteral estrogen-progestogen administration. Fertil Steril 1969; 20: 75
   Google Scholar
• Dellepiane G. In Advantages and disadvantages of intrauterine aspiration technique for endometrial cytology. Acta Cytol 1958; 2: 568
   Google Scholar
• Diamond B., Mitchell N., Blum E. An evaluation of surface sponge biopsy in a cancer detection clinic with special reference to the use of an endometrial sponge biopsy forceps. Amer J Obstet Gynec 1952; 63: 668
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira C. A. Study of the functional cytology of the endometrium. Rev Franc Gynec Obstet 1960; 55: 25
   Google Scholar
• Fox C. H., Turner F. G., Johnson W. L., Thornton W. N. Endometrial cytology. Amer J Obstet Gynec 1962; 83: 1582
   Google Scholar
• Haour P. In Advantages and disadvantages of intrauterine aspiration technique for endometrial cytology. Acta Cytol 1958; 2: 566
   Google Scholar
• Hecht E. L. The endometrial aspiration smear, research status and clinical value. Amer J Obstet Gynec 1956; 7: 819
   Google Scholar
• Horava H., de Neef J. C., Boutselis J. C. The exfoliative cytologic characteristics of the endometrium in health and disease. Clin Obstet Gynec 1961; 4: 1128
   Google Scholar
• Johnsson J.-E., Stormby N. G. Cytological brush technique in malignant disease of the endometrium. Acta Obstet Gynec Scand 1968; 47: 38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan M. J., Bader G., Nemazie A. S. Comparative accuracy of preoperative cytologic and histologic diagnosis in endometrial lesions. Obstet Gynec 1956; 7: 646
   Google Scholar
• Koss L. G. Diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic bases, 2nd ed. Pitman Medical Publishing Co. Ltd/J. B. Lippincott Co., London & Philadelphia 1968
   Google Scholar
• Koss L. G., Durfee G. R. Cytologic diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma; Results of ten years of experience. Acta Cytol 1962; 6: 519
   Google Scholar
• Lubke W. E. Endometrial lavage: A screening technic for cancer detection. Obstet Gynec 1965; 25: 183
   Google Scholar
• Maqueo-Topete M., Decerra C., Munguia H., Gold-Zieher J. W. Endometrial histology and vaginal cytology during oral contraception with sequential estrogen and progestin. Amer J Obstet Gynsc 1964; 90: 395
   Google Scholar
• Morton D. G., Moore J. G., Chang N. Lavage of the endometrial cavity as an aid in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the uterine corpus. J Int Coll Surg 1959; 31: 570
   Google Scholar
• Noyes R. W., Hertig A. T., Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril 1950; 1: 3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuovo M. V. In Advantages and disadvantages of intrauterine aspiration technique for endometrial cytology. Acta Cytol 1958; 2: 570
   Google Scholar
• Peters H. Zytologie des Endometriums wahrend des Zyklus. Symp. angew. exfoliat. Zytol Brussels 1957
   Google Scholar
• Rascoe R. R. Endometrial aspiration smear in diagnosis of malignancy of the uterine corpus. Amer Obstet Gynec 1963; 87: 921
   Google Scholar
• Reagan J. W., Ng A. B.P. The cells of uterine adenocarcinoma. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1965
   Google Scholar
• Smolka H. Differentiation of endocervical and endometrial cells. Acta Cytol 1958; 2: 515
   Google Scholar
• Starup J. Endometrial histology and vaginal cytology during oral contraception. Acta Obstet Gynec Scand 1967; 46: 419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzano G. Advantages and disadvantages of intrauterine aspiration technique for endometrial cytology. Acta Cytol 1958; 2: 567
   Google Scholar
• Wied G. L., Battels P. H., Bahr G. F., Oldfield D. G. Taxonomic intra-cellular analytic system (TICAS) for cell identification. Acta Cytol 1968; 12: 180
   Google Scholar
• Wied G. L., Bartels P. H., Bahr G. F., Reagan J. W. TICAS assessment of cells from atypical hyperplasia of the endometrium. Acta Cytol 1969a; 13: 552
   Google Scholar
• Wied G. L., Bibbo M., Bahr G. F., Bartels P. H. Computerized recognition of uterine glandular cells. II. The application of a self-learning program. Acta Cytol 1969b; 13: 662
   Google Scholar
• Witt H. J. Karyometrie. Das menschliche Endometrium, H. Schmidt-Matthiesen. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1963
   Google Scholar
• Vokaer R., Gompel C., Ghilain A. Variation in the content of deoxyribonucleic acid in the human uterine and vaginal receptors during the menstrual cycle. Nature 1953; 31: 172
   Google Scholar
• Wynn R. M. Intrauterine devices Effects on ultrastructure of human endometrium. Science 1967; 156: 1508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar