Conceptual Dating by Ultrasonic Measurement of the Fetal Biparietal Diameter in Early Pregnancy

References

• Campbell S. The prediction of fetal maturity by ultrasonic measurement of the biparietal diameter. J Obstet Gynaecol Brit Cwlth 1969; 76: 603–609
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson H P. Sonar Measurement of Fetal Crown—Rump Length as Means of Assessing Maturity in First Trimester of Pregnancy. Br Med J 1973; iv: 28
   Google Scholar
• Robinson H P, Fleming J EE. A critical evaluation of sonar “crown—rump length” measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 702
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drumm J E. The prediction of delivery date by ultrasonic measurement of fetal crown—rump length. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1977; 84: 1
   Google Scholar
• Bulic M, Vrtar M. Ultrasonic planimetry of the gestation sac as a biometric method in early pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 1978; 6: 228–232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sabbagha R E, Hughey M. Standardization of sonar cephalometry and gestational age. Obstet Gynaecol 1978; 52: 402–406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovicelli L, Orsini L F, Rizzo N, et al. Estimation of Gestational Age During the First Trimester by Realtime Measurement of Fetal Crown-Rump and Biparietal Diameter. J Clin Ultrasound 1981; 9: 71
   Google Scholar
• Kopta M M, May R R, Crane J P. A comparison of the reliability of the estimated date of confinement predicted by crown—rump length and biparietal diameter. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 145: 562–565
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen J F. Fetal crown—rump length measurement by ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 926
   Google Scholar
• Selbing A. Gestational age and ultrasonic measurement of gestational sac, crown—rump length and biparietal diameter during first 15 weeks of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 61: 233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohorn E l, Kaufman M. Sonar in the first trimester of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1974; 44: 473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman L M, Kobayashi M, Fillisti L, et al. Growth and development of the human fetus prior to the twentieth week of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 6: 789
   Google Scholar
• Willocks J, Dunsmore I R. Assessment of gestatio-nal age and prediction of dysmaturity by ultrasonic fetal cephalometry. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Cwlth 1971; 78: 804
   Google Scholar
• Sabbagha E, Barton B A, Barton F B, et al. Sonar biparietal diameter. II. Predictive of three fetal growth patterns leading to a closer assessment of gestational age and neonatal weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126: 485, 1976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz A B, Wapner R J, Kurtz R J, et al. Analysis of Biparietal Diameter as an Accurate Indicator of Gestational Age. J Clin Ultrasound 1980; 8: 319
   Google Scholar
• Levi S, Smets P. Intra-uterine fetal growth studied by ultrasonic biparietal measurements. The Percentiles of Biparietal Distribution. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1973; 52: 193–198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien G D, Queenan J T. Growth of the ultrasound fetal femur length during normal pregnancy. Part I. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141: 833–837
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Brien G, Queenan J T, Campbell S. Assessment of gestational age in the second trimester by real-time ultrasound measurement of the femur length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 139: 540–545
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hadlock F P, Harrist R B, Deter R L, Park S K. Fetal Femur Length as a Predictor of Menstrual age: Sono-graphically Measured. Am J Radiol 1982; 138: 875–878
   Google Scholar
• Mayden K L, Tortora M, Berkowitz R L, Bracken M, Hobbins J C. Orbital diameters: A new parameter for prenatal diagnosis and dating. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 289–297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selbing A, Fjällbrandt B. Accuracy of conceptual age estimation from fetal crown-rump length. J Clin Ultrasound 1984; 12: 343–346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selbing A. The pregnant population and a fetal crown—rump length screening program. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1983; 161, Suppl. 62
   Google Scholar
• Persson P-H, Grennert L, Gennser G, et al. Normal range curves for the intrauterine growth of the biparietal diameter. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1978; 15, Suppl. 78
   Google Scholar