References
- Banta H D, Thacker S B. Assessing the costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1979; 34: 627–42
- Keno K J, Cunningham F G, Nelson S, et al. A prospective comparison of selective and universal electronic fetal monitoring in 34,995 pregnancies. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 615
- MacDonald D, Grant A, Sheridan-Pereira M, et al. The Dublin randomized trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 524–39
- Stigsby B, Nielsen P V, Docker M. Computer description and evaluation of cardiotocograms: A review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1986; 21: 61–86
- Nielsen P V, Stigsby B, Nickelsen C, et al. Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 421–24
- Jongsma H W, Oostendorp T F, Martin C B. Interobserver agreement in descriptive coding of cardiotocograms. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1985; 20: 77–8
- Stigsby B, Nielsen P V, Olesen M B, et al. Computer description of the cardiotocogram, I: The computer program. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 109(Suppl)76–8
- Nielsen P V, Stigsby B, Nickelsen C, et al. Computer assessment of the intrapartum cardiotocogram. The value of computer assessment compared with visual, II
- Habbema J FD, Hilden J, Bjerregaard B. The measurement of performance in probabilistic diagnosis. III Methods based on continuous functions of the diagnostic probabilities. Meth Inform Med 1978; 17: 238–46