References
- Stigsby B, Nielsen P V, Nickelsen C, Nim J. Computer assessment of the intrapartum cardiotocogram. I. Methods of datareduction and diagnostic procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988; 67: 455–60
- Stigsby B, Nielsen P V, Docker M. Computer description and evaluation of cardiotocograms: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1986; 21: 61–86
- Banta H D, Thacker S B. Assessing the costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1979; 34: 627–42
- Beaulieu M D, Fabia J, Leduc B, Brisson J, Bastide A, Blouin D, Gauthier R J, Blonde A. The reproducibility of intrapartum cardiotocogram assessment. Can Med ASSOC J 1982; 127: 214–16
- Trimbo J B, Keirse M JNC. Observer variability in assessment of antepartum cardiotocograms. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1978; 85: 900–06
- Lotgering F K, Wallenburg H CS, Schoutern H JA. Inter-observer and intraobserver variation in the assessment of antepartum cardiotocograms. J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 701–05
- Flynn A M, Kelly J, Matthews K, O'Conner M, Viegas O. Predictive value of, and observer variability in, several ways of reporting antepartum cardiotocographs. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 434–40
- Nielsen P V, Stigsby Nickelsen C, Nim J. Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 421–24