References
- Haverkamp A D, Orleans M, Langendoerfer S, et al. A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 134: 399–408
- Greenland S, Olsen J, Rachootin P, Pedersen G T. Effects of electronic fetal monitoring on rates of early neonatal death, low Apgar score, and Cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985; 64: 75–80
- MacDonald D, Grant A, Sheridan‐Pereira M, et al. The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 524–39
- Leveno K J, Cunningham F G, Nelson S, et al. A prospective comparison of selective and universal electronic fetal monitoring in 34,995 pregnancies. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 615–9
- Ingemarsson I, Arulkumaran A, Ingemarsson E, Tambyraja R L, Ratnam S S. Admission test: A screening test for fetal distress in labor. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 800–6
- American Medical Association. Confronting regional variations. The Maine approach. 1986
- Rothberg D L. Regional variations in hospital use, geographic and temporal patterns of care in the United States. University Health Policy Consortium Series, Lexington 1982
- Montan S, Olofsson P, Solum T. Classification of the nonstress test and fetal outcome in 1056 pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985; 64: 639–44
- Nielsen P V, Stigsby B, Nickelsen C, Nim J. Intra‐ and inter‐observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 421–4
- Wennergren M, Krantz M, Hjalmarson O. Fetal heart rate pattern and risk for respiratory disturbance in full‐term newborns. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 49–53
- Gorman P A, Calatayud J B, Abraham S, Caceres C A. Observer variation in interpretation of electrocardiogram. Med Ann Distr Columbia 1964; 33: 97–9
- Davis L G. Observer variation in reports on electrocardiograms. Br Heart J 1958; 20: 153–61
- Sarmandal P, Bailey S M, Grant J M. A comparison of three methods of assessing inter‐observer variation applied to ultrasonic fetal measurement in the third trimester. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 1261–5
- Lotgering F K, Wallenburg H C S, Schouten H J A. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of antepartum cardiotocograms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 701–5
- Stigsby B, Nielsen P V, Nickelsen C, Nim J. Computer assessment of the intrapartum cardiotocograms. Methods of data reduction and diagnostic procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988; 67: 455–60
- Nielsen P V, Stigsby B, Nickelsen C, Nim J. Computer assessment of the intrapartum cardiotocogram. The value of computer assessment compared with visual assessment. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988; 67: 461–4
- Murray H G. The fetal electrocardiogram: current clinical developments in Nottingham. J Perinat Med 1986; 14: 399–404
- Rosén K G. Alterations in the fetal electrocardiogram as a sign of fetal asphyxia. Experimental data with a clinical implementation. J Perinat Med 1986; 14: 355–63