Contraceptive practice and attitudes in Sweden 1994

References

• Oddens B. Contraceptive use in developed countries. The reproductive revolution: the role of contraception and education in population and development, P Senanayake. Parthenon Publishing Group, Carnforth 1994; 38–55
   Google Scholar
• Riphagen F E, Ketting E. Comparative overview of results from eight surveys on contraceptive behaviour. Contraception in Western Europe; a current appraisal, E Ketting. Parthenon Publishing Group, Carnforth 1990; 77–110
   Google Scholar
• Andersch B, Milsom I. Contraception and pregnancy among young women in an urban Swedish population. Contraception 1982; 26: 211–9
   Google Scholar
• Riphagen F E, Schoultz V. B. Contraception in Sweden. Contraception 1989; 39: 633–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milsom I, Sundell G, Andersch B. A longitudinal study of contraception and pregnancy outcome in a representative sample of young Swedish women. Contraception 1991; 43: 113–21
   Google Scholar
• Brännström M, Josefsson G B, Liljestrand J. Contraception and sexuality in an area-specific group of Swedish women 15–34 years of age. Contraception 1991; 44: 445–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Persson E, Gustafsson B, Rooijen V. M. Subsidising contraception for young people in Sweden. Plann Parenth Eur 1994; 23: 1, 2–4
   Google Scholar
• Csillag C. Sweden: abortion among teenagers halved. Lancet 1993; 341: 1084
   Google Scholar
• Oddens B J. Determinants of contraceptive use; national population-based studies in various West European countries (PhD thesis University of Nijmegen). Eburon, Delft 1996
   Google Scholar
• Oddens B J, Visser APh, Vemer H M, Everaerd WThAM, Lehert P. Contraceptive use and attitudes in Great Britain. Contraception 1994; 49: 73–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oddens B J, Visser A P, Vemer H M, Everaerd W TAM. Contraceptive use and attitudes in reunified Germany. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994; 57: 201–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oddens B J. Contraceptive use and attitudes in Italy 1993. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 533–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Central Bureau of Statistics. Statistical Yearbook of Sweden. Stockholm 1994
   Google Scholar
• Riphagen F E, Lehert P. A survey of contraception in five West European countries. J Biosoc Sci 1989; 21: 23–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosher W D. Contraceptive practice in the US, 1982–1988. Fam Plann Perspect 1990; 22: 198–205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Fertility Survey. Fertility survey in Sweden 1981. International Statistical Institute, The Hague 1984
   Google Scholar
• De Leeuw E D, Hox J J, Van der Zouwen J. Data quality in mail surveys as compared to face-to-face and telephone interviews: a meta-analysis of the research literature. Kwantitatieve Methoden 1989; 31: 123–46
   Google Scholar
• Abortions. 1993. Statistics of the National Board of Health and Welfare. Stockholm 1994
   Google Scholar
• Lakemedelsverket. (Medical Products Agency of Sweden), Statens Legemiddelkontroll (The Norwegian Medicines Control Authority)Contraceptive methods. Uppsala/Oslo 1994
   Google Scholar
• Geirsson R T, Gudmundsson J A. Er pillan betri en af er látid. Heilbrigdsmål 1987; 4: 12–5
   Google Scholar
• Osler M, Riphagen F E. Contraceptive survey: Denmark 1988. Contraception 1990; 42: 507–21
   Google Scholar
• Makkonen K, Hemminki E. Different contraceptive practices: use of contraceptives in Finland and other Nordic countries in the 1970s and 1980s. Scand J Soc Med 1991; 19: 32–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skjeldestad F E. Choice of contraceptive modality by women in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993; 72: 48–52
   Google Scholar
• Ingelhammar E, Möller A, Svanberg B, Tornbom M, Lilja H, Hamberger L. The use of contraceptive methods among women seeking a legal abortion. Contraception 1994; 50: 143–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benagiano G, Serfaty D, Adams Hillard P J, Potter L, Demeyer F, Thorneycroft IH. A consensus statement: enhancing patient compliance and oral contraceptive efficacy. Br J Fam Plann 1993; 18: 126–9
   Google Scholar