References
- Weitzman G A, Korhonen M O, Reeves K O, et al. Endocerv-ical brush cytology. An alternative to endoccrvical curettage? J Reprod Med 1988; 33: 677–83
- Frost L. Cytobrush in evaluation of cervical dysplasia. Is cervical curettage necessary?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990; 69: 645–7
- Andersen W, Frierson H, Barber S, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of endocervical curettage and the endocervical brush for the evaluation of the endocervical canal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 702–7
- Gosewehr J A, Julian T M, O'Connel B J. Improving the cytobrush as an aid in the evaluation of the abnormal Papanicolaou test. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 440–3