Effect of resin coating and occlusal loading on microleakage of class II computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing fabricated ceramic restorations: A confocal microscopic study

References

• Fradeani M, Redemagni M. An 11-year clinical evaluation of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns: a retrospective study. Quintessence Int 2002;33:503–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer S, Gohlich O, Ruttermann S, Lang H, Raab WH, Barthel CR. Long-term survival of Cerec restorations: a 10-year study. Oper Dent 2008;33:484–7.
   Google Scholar
• Burke FJ, Fleming GJ, Nathanson D, Marquis PM. Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:7–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burke FJ. The effect of variations in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 1995;26:293–300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:280–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Satoh M, Tagami J. Early bonding of resin cements to dentin–effect of bonding environment. Oper Dent 1996;21:196–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuda M, Nikaido T, Maruoka R, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strengths to cavity floor dentin in indirect composite restorations using resin coating. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:38–46.
   Google Scholar
• Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns. Dent Mater 2005;21:445–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen GJ. Resin cements and postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:1197–9.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inokoshi S, Shimada Y, Fujitani M, Otsuki M, Shono T, Onoe N, Monkey pulpal response to adhesively luted indirect resin composite inlays. Oper Dent 1995;20:111–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:105–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of a “resin coating” on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent 2003;28:28–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• da cunha Mello FS, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in a Class II restoration after mechanical fatiguing. Dent Mater 1997;13:372–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu XH, Kern M. Marginal discrepancies and leakage of all-ceramic crowns: influence of luting agents and aging conditions. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:109–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Titley KC, Chernecky R, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV. The effect of various storage methods and media on shear-bond strengths of dental composite resin to bovine dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1998;43:305–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi M, Sugeta A, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Static and fatigue fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores. Dent Mater 2008;24:1178–86.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson D. Measurement of stress in mastication. II. J Dent Res 1956;35:671–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Delong R, Pintado MR. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 1986;2:235–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitayama S, Pilecki P, Nasser AN, Bravis T, Wilson RF, Nikaido T, Effect of resin coating on adhesion and microleakage of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing fabricated all-ceramic crowns after occlusal loading: a laboratory study. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:454–62.
   Google Scholar
• Chieffi N, Chersoni S, Papacchini F, Vano M, Goracci C, Davidson CL, The effect of application sustained seating pressure on adhesive luting procedure. Dent Mater 2007;23:159–64.
   Google Scholar
• Tsuchiya S, Nikaido T, Sonoda H, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Ultrastructure of the dentin-adhesive interface after acid-base challenge. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:183–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donmez N, Belli S, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Ultrastructural correlates of in vivo/in vitro bond degradation in self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2005;84:355–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momoi Y, Akimoto N, Kida K, Yip KH, Kohno A. Sealing ability of dentin coating using adhesive resin systems. Am J Dent 2003;16:105–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater 2001;17:542–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69:1652–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayad MF, Fahmy NZ, Rosenstiel SF. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:123–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Hassan FM, Feilzer AJ. The effect of adhesives with various degrees of hydrophilicity on resin ceramic bond durability. Dent Mater 2004;20:778–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darbyshire PA, Messer LB, Douglas WH. Microleakage in class II composite restorations bonded to dentin using thermal and load cycling. J Dent Res 1988;67:585–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson TF, Boyde A. Tandem scanning reflected light microscopy: applications in clinical dental research. Scanning Microsc 1987;1:1971–81.
   Google Scholar
• Watson TF, Boyde A. Confocal light microscopic techniques for examining dental operative procedures and dental materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1991;4:193–200.
   Google Scholar
• Schenke F, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Federlin M. Marginal integrity of partial ceramic crowns within dentin with different luting techniques and materials. Oper Dent 2008;33:516–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:508–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 1989;68:48–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2. Am J Dent 2002;15:279–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NR, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent 2004;32:55–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater 2006;22:973–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietschi D, Scampa U, Campanile G, Holz J. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int 1995;26:127–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yanagawa T, Finger WJ. Relationship between degree of polymerization of resin composite and bond strength to Gluma-treated dentin. Am J Dent 1994;7:157–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of dentine location and tubule orientation on the bond strengths between resin and dentine. J Dent 1999;27:265–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar