Load-bearing capacity of fiber reinforced fixed composite bridges

References

• Shillingburg HT, Sumiya H, Lowell DW, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. editors. Provisional restorations. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• El-Mowafy O, Rubo M. Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures a literature review with presentation of a novel approach. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:460–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butterworth C, Ellakwa AE, Shortall A. Fiber-reinforced composites in restorative dentistry. Dent Update 2003;30:300–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacob J, Shivaputra AG, Ila S. Flexural strength of heatpolymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture resin reinforced with glass, aramid, or nylon fibers. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:424–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:318–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK, Meiers J, Dyer SR, Rosentritt M. Consensus statement on fiber-reinforced polymers: current status, future directions, and how they can be used to enhance dental care. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallittu PK. Survival rates of resin-bonded, glass fiberreinforced composite fixed partial dentures with a mean follow-up of 42-months: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:241–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luı Jl, Seteos JC, Phillips RW. Temporary restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1986;11:103–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vallittu PK. Comparison of the in vitro fatigue resistance of acrylic resin removable partial denture reinforced with continuous glass fibers or metal wires. J Prosthodont 1996;5:115–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vallittu PK, Narva K. Impact strength of a modified continuous glass fiber-poly (methyl methacrylate). Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:142–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R. Acrylic resin-fiber composite-part I: the effect of fiber concentration on fracture resistance. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:607–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stipho HD. Repair of acrylic resin denture base reinforced with glass fiber. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:546–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladizesky NH, Cheng YY, Chow TW, Ward IM. Acrylic resin reinforced with chopped high performance polyethylene fiber properties and denture construction. Dent Mater 1993;9:128–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer SR, Lassila LVJ, Jokinen M, Vallittu PK. Effect of fiber position and orientation on fracture load of fiber reinforced composite. Dent Mater 2004;20:947–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallittu PK. The effect of void space and polymerization time on transverse strength of acrylic-glass fiber composite. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:257–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellakwa AE, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:485–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae JM, Kim KN, Hattori M, Hasegawa K, Yoshinari M, Kawada E, Fatigue strengths of particulate filler composites reinforced with fibers. Dent Mater J 2004;23:166–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heumen van CCM, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Lesaffre E, Creugers NHJ. Fiber-reinforced dental composites in beam testing. Dent Mater 2008;24:1435–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jokstad A, Gokce M, Hjortsjo C. A systematic review of the scientific documentation of fixed partial dentures made from fiber-reinforced polymer to replace missing teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:489–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of fiber orientation on the polymerization shrinkage strain of fiber-reinforced composites. Dent Mater 2006;22:610–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays: an 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:71–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough M. A review of temporary crowns and bridges. Dent Update 1994;21:203–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagge MS, Lindemuth JS, Jones AG. Shear bond strength of bis-acryl composite provisional material repaired with flowable composite. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14:47–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behr M, Rosentritt M, Taubenhansl P, Kolbeck C, Handel G. Fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced composite restorations with different framework design. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63:153–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Q, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Comparison of load-bearing capacity of direct resin-bonded fiber-reinforced composite FDPs with four framework designs. J Dent 2007;35:578–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Eckrote KA, Goldberg AJ. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced fixed bridges. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:1524–34; quiz 1540–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen RC. Discontinuous fiber-reinforced composites above critical length. J Dent Res 2005;84:365–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R. Transverse strength and fatigue of denture acrylic-glass fiber composite. Dent Mater 1994;10:116–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Fonte Porto Carreiro A, Dos Santos Cruz CA, Vergani CE. Hardness and compressive strength of indirect composite resins: effects of immersion in distilled water. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:1085–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:353–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis AR, Shortall AC, Marquis PM, Palin WM. Water uptake characteristics of a nano-filled resin-based composite. J Dent 2008;36:186–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;76:114–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calheiros F, Kawano Y, Stansbury JW, Braga RR. Influence of radiant exposure on concentration stress, degree of conversion and mechanical properties of resin composites. Dent Mater 2006;22:799–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer H, Weber M, Eck M, Erdrich A, Marx R. Finite element and experimental analyses of polymer-based dental bridges reinforced by ceramic bars. J Biomech 2004;37:289–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinschert J, Natt G, Doose B, Fischer H, Marx R. High performance ceramic posterior bridges. Dtsch Zahnarztliche Z 1999;54:545–50.
   Google Scholar
• Garoushi S, Lassila LV, Tezvergil A, Vallittu PK. Load bearing capacity of fibre-reinforced and particulate filler composite resin combination. J Dent 2006;34:179–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keulemans F, Lassila LV, Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. The influence of framework design on the load-bearing capacity of laboratory-made inlay-retained fibre-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses. J Biomech 2009;42:844–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozcan M, Breuklander MH, Vallittu PK. The effect of box preparation on the strength of glass fiber-reinforced composite inlay retained fixed partial denture. J Prosth Dent 2005;93:337–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallittu PK, Kononen M. Biomedical aspects and material properties. In Karlsson S, Nilner K, Dahl BL, editors. A textbook of fixed prosthodontics. A Scandinavian approach. Stockholm, Sweden: Gothia; 2000. p 116–30.
   Google Scholar
• Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG. The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:462–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar