819
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels around dental implants with different designs after 1 year

, , , &
Pages 92-95 | Received 15 May 2011, Accepted 07 Nov 2011, Published online: 25 Sep 2012

References

  • Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of uploaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:1117–30.
  • Shapoff CA, Lahey B, Wasserlauf PA, Kim DM. Radiographic analysis of crestal bone levels around Laser-Lok collar dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:129–37.
  • Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387–416.
  • Fugazzotto PA. Shorter implants in clinical practice: rationale and treatment results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:487–96.
  • Palmer RM, Smith BJ, Palmer PJ, Floyd PD. A prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:173–9.
  • Norton MR. Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:91–9.
  • Moeintaghavi A, Radvar M, Kadkhodazadeh M, Arab HR. Clinical and radiographical evaluation of maximus implants, with immediate nonfunctional loading. Int J Oral Maxilofac Surg 2007;36:1092.
  • Kim JJ, Lee DW, Kim CK, Park KH, Moon IS. Effect of conical configuration of fixture on the maintenance of marginal bone level: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:439–44.
  • Shin YK, Han CH, Heo SJ, Kim S, Chun HJ. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:789–94.
  • Geramy A, Morgano SM. Finite element analysis of three designs of an implant-supported molar crown. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:434–40.
  • Kong L, Hu K, Li D, Song Y, Yang J, Wu Z, Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:65–74.
  • Misch C, Strong T, Bidez MW. Scientific rational for dental implant design. In Misch C, editor. Contemporary implants dentistry. 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2008. p 203–4.
  • Ahlqvist J, Borg K, Nilson H, Olson M, Astrand P. Osseointegrated implants in edentulous jaws: a 2-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:155–62.
  • Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Lindhe J, Eriksson B, Sbordone L. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;13:39–52.
  • Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol 2002;73:322–33.
  • Jemt T, Lekholm U, Gröndahl K. 3-year followup study of early single implant restorations ad modum Brånemark. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1990;10:340–9.
  • Chang M, Wennström JL. Peri-implant soft tissue and bone crest alterations at fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:527–34.
  • Daood U, Bandey N, Qasim SB, Omar H, Khan SA. Surface characterization analysis of failed dental implants using scanning electron microscopy. Acta Odontol Scand 2011;69:367–73.
  • Marin C, Bonfante EA, Granato R, Suzuki M, Granjeiro JM, Coelho PG. The effect of alterations on resorbable blasting media processed implant surfaces on early bone healing: a study in rabbits. Implant Dent 2011;20:167–77.
  • Albouy JP, Abrahamsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T. Implant surface characteristics influence the outcome of treatment of peri-implantitis: an experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:58–64.
  • Hermann F, Lerner H, Palti A. Factors influencing the preservation of the periimplant marginal bone. Implant Dent 2007;16:165–75.
  • Norton MR. Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:91–9.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.