613
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Oral health-related quality-of-life in patients to be treated with fixed or removable partial dental prostheses

&
Pages 113-119 | Received 15 Jul 2011, Accepted 14 Dec 2011, Published online: 09 Mar 2012

References

  • Narby B, Kronstrom M, Soderfeldt B, Palmqvist S. Prosthodontics and the patient. Part 2: need becoming demand, demand becoming utilization. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:183–9.
  • Srisilapanan P, Sheiham A. Assessing the difference between sociodental and normative approaches to assessing prosthetic dental treatment needs in dentate older people. Gerodontology 2001;18:25–34.
  • Ryu JI, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. Differences in prosthodontic treatment needs assessments between the standard normative and sociodental approach. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:425–32.
  • Gotfredsen K, Walls AW. What dentition assures oral function? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(Suppl 3):34–45.
  • Allen PF. Assessment of oral health related quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:40.
  • Locker D, Jokovic A, Clarke M. Assessing the responsiveness of measures of oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:10–18.
  • Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 1994;11:3–11.
  • Jones JA, Orner MB, Spiro A III, Kressin NR. Tooth loss and dentures: patients' perspectives. Int Dent J 2003;53:327–34.
  • Özhayat EB, Gotfredsen K, Elverdam B, Öwall B. Patient-generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making. II. Comparison of an individual systematic interview method and the oral health impact profile. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:421–8.
  • Özhayat EB, Gotfredsen K, Elverdam B, Öwall B. Comparison of an individual systematic interview method and the oral health impact profile. Responsiveness and ability of describing treatment effect of oral rehabilitation. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:604–14.
  • Özhayat EB, Gotfredsen K, Elverdam B, Öwall B. Patient-generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:726–36.
  • Özhayat EB, Stoltze K, Elverdam B, Öwall B. A method for assessment of quality of life in relation to prosthodontics. Partial edentulism and removable partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:336–44.
  • Reisine ST, Fertig J, Weber J, Leder S. Impact of dental conditions on patients' quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989;17:7–10.
  • Robinson JH, Callister LC, Berry JA, Dearing KA. Patient-centered care and adherence: definitions and applications to improve outcomes. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2008;20:600–7.
  • Frank RP, Milgrom P, Leroux BG, Hawkins NR. Treatment outcomes with mandibular removable partial dentures: a population-based study of patient satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:36–45.
  • Hanson BS, Liedberg B, Owall B. Social network, social support and dental status in elderly Swedish men. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22:331–7.
  • Gjørup H, Svensson P. OHIP-(D), en dansk version af Oral Health Impact Profile. Et redskab til registrering af livskvalitet i forhold til det orofaciale område. Tandlaegebladet 2006;110:304–11.
  • Dueled E, Gotfredsen K, Trab DM, Hede B. Professional and patient-based evaluation of oral rehabilitation in patients with tooth agenesis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:729–36.
  • Goshima K, Lexner MO, Thomsen CE, Miura H, Gotfredsen K, Bakke M. Functional aspects of treatment with implant-supported single crowns: a quality control study in subjects with tooth agenesis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:108–14.
  • Szentpetery AG, John MT, Slade GD, Setz JM. Problems reported by patients before and after prosthodontic treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:124–31.
  • Fayers PM, Machin D. Multi-item Scales. In Fayers PM, Machin D, editors. Quality of life. Assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester: Wiley; 2000. p 72–90.
  • Fayers PM, Machin D. Factor analysis. In Fayers PM, Machin D, editors. Quality of life. Assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester: Wiley; 2000. p 91–116.
  • Locker D, Allen F. What do measures of 'oral health-related quality of life' measure? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35:401–11.
  • McGrath C, Bedi R. Gender variations in the social impact of oral health. J Ir Dent Assoc 2000;46:87–91.
  • Doyal L, Naidoo S. Why dentists should take a greater interest in sex and gender. Br Dent J 2010;209:335–7.
  • Carr AJ, Gibson B, Robinson PG. Measuring quality of life: is quality of life determined by expectations or experience? BMJ 2001;322:1240–3.
  • Steele JG, Sanders AE, Slade GD, Allen PF, Lahti S, Nuttall N, How do age and tooth loss affect oral health impacts and quality of life? A study comparing two national samples. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:107–14.
  • Åstrøm AN, Haugejorden O, Skaret E, Trovik TA, Klock KS. Oral impacts on daily performance in Norwegian adults: the influence of age, number of missing teeth, and socio-demographic factors. Eur J Oral Sci 2006;114:115–21.
  • Hassel AJ, Rolko C, Grossmann AC, Ohlmann B, Rammelsberg P. Correlations between self-ratings of denture function and oral health-related quality of life in different age groups. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:242–4.
  • John MT, Slade GD, Szentpetery A, Setz JM. Oral health-related quality of life in patients treated with fixed, removable, and complete dentures 1 month and 6 to 12 months after treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:503–11.
  • Locker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health 1988;5:3–18.
  • Locker D, Jokovic A. Using subjective oral health status indicators to screen for dental care needs in older adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:398–402.
  • Locker D, Slade G. Association between clinical and subjective indicators of oral health status in an older adult population. Gerodontology 1994;11:108–14.
  • Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, Locker D, Klemetti E, Chehade A, Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:390–6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.