Availability of CBCT and iatrogenic alveolar nerve injuries

References

• Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1558–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:245–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipp DP, Goldstein BH, Weiss WW Jr. Dysesthesia after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1,377 surgical procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;100:185–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaco G, Montevecchi M, Bonetti GA, Gatto MR, Checchi L. Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:312–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Libersa P, Savignat M, Tonnel A. Neurosensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve: a retrospective study of complaints in a 10-year period. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1486–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flygare L, Öhman A. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clin Oral Investig 2008;12:291–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heurich T, Ziegler C, Steveling H, Wörtche R, Mühling J, Hassfeld S. Digital volume tomography-an extension to the diagnostic procedures available for application before surgical removal of third molars. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2002;6:427–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danforth RA, Peck J, Hall P. Cone beam volume tomography: an imaging option for diagnosis of complex mandibular third molar anatomical relationships. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:847–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:253–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedland B, Donoff B, Dodson TB. The use of 3-dimensional reconstructions to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1678–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neugebauer J, Shirani R, Mischkowski RA, Ritter L, Scheer M, Keeve E, Comparison of cone-beam volumetric imaging and combined plain radiographs for localization of the mandibular canal before removal of impacted lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:633–42; discussion 643.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tantanapornkul W, Okochi K, Bhakdinaronk A, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T. Correlation of darkening of impacted mandibular third molar root on digital panoramic images with cone beam computed tomography findings. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:11–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suomalainen A, Ventä I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola J. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:276–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEDENTEXCT. Radiation protection: cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines. Available online at: http://www.sedentexct.eu. Accessed 14 August 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ventä I, Lindqvist C, Ylipaavalniemi P. Malpractice claims for permanent nerve injuries related to third molar removals. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:193–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisk A, Hammer W, Shelton D, Joy E. Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44:855–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerjes W, Upile T, Shah P, Nhembe F, Gudka D, Kafas P, Risk factors associated with injury to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves following third molar surgery-revisited. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:335–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:106–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:640 e1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden D, Suetens P, Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2009;71:461–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Käser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:367–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suomalainen AK, Salo A, Robinson S, Peltola JS. The 3DX multi image micro-CT device in clinical dental practice. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:80–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar