Influence of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays

References

• Bertolotti RL. Posterior composite technique utilizing directed polymerization shrinkage and a novel matrix. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1991;3:53–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986;17:777–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lutz F, Krejci I, Luescher B, Oldenburg TR. Improved proximal margin adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 1986;17:659–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weaver WS, Blank LW, Pelleu GBJ. A visible-light-activated resin cured through tooth structure. Gen Dent 1988;36:236–7.
   Google Scholar
• Donly KJ, Wild TW, Bowen RL, Jensen ME. An in vitro investigation of the effects of glass inserts on the effective composite resin polymerization shrinkage. J Dent Res 1989;68:1234–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Mortazavi F. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent 1997;22:21–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Indirect techniques. In: Dietschi D,Spreafico R (eds). Adhesive metal-free restorations. Current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth. Quintessence; Chicago: 1997. p. 139–67.
   Google Scholar
• Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:47–54; quiz 56.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovich H, Roeters FJ, Verdonschot N, de Kanter RJ, Creugers NH. Effect of composite basing on the resistance to bulk fracture of industrial porcelain inlays. J Dent 1998;26:183–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carvalho RM, Santiago SL, Fernandes CA, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effects of prism orientation on tensile strength of enamel. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:251–7.
   Google Scholar
• Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent Mater 1993;9:2–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 1999;78:898–905.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:658–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdigao J, Swift EJ. Analysis of dental adhesive systems using scanning electron microscopy. Int Dent J 1994;44:349–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 1999;78:699–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt SLJ, Leinfelder KF. The clinical evaluation of heat-treated composite resin inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:177–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;29:481–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneshima T, Yatani H, Kasai T, Watanabe EK, Yamashita A. The influence of blood contamination on bond strengths between dentin and an adhesive resin cement. Oper Dent 2000;25:195–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JW, Lee KC. The influence of salivary contamination on shear bond strength of dentin adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2004;29:437–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachibana A, Castanho GM, Vieira SN, Matos AB. Influence of blood contamination on bond strength of a self-etching adhesive to dental tissues. J Adhes Dent 2010;13:349–58.
   Google Scholar
• Spreafico RC, Krejci I, Dietschi D. Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo.. J Dent 2005;33:499–507.
   Google Scholar
• Veneziani M. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins: new classification and differentiated treatment approach. Eur J Esthet Dent 2010;5:50–76.
   Google Scholar
• Krejci I, Kuster M, Lutz F. Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites. J Dent Res 1993;72:490–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hannig C, Laubach S, Hahn P, Attin T. Shear bond strength of repaired adhesive filling materials using different repair procedures. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:953–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krejci I, Albertoni M, Lutz F. An in-vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 2. Toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion and chemical degradation. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:1164–8.
   Google Scholar
• Krejci I, Lutz F. [In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:1445–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gohring TN, Besek MJ, Schmidlin PR. Attritional wear and abrasive surface alterations of composite resin materials in vitro. J Dent 2002;30:119–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gohring TN, Schonenberger KA, Lutz F. Potential of restorative systems with simplified adhesives: quantitative analysis of wear and marginal adaptation in vitro.. Am J Dent 2003;16:275–82.
   Google Scholar
• Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Oper Dent 2001;26:357–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater 2006;22:712–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambrechts P, Debels E, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods. Dent Mater 2006;22:693–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolotto T, Onisor I, Krejci I. Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning. Clin Oral Investig 2007;11:35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dietschi D, Moor L. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:41–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater 2008;24:185–91.
   Google Scholar
• Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137(Suppl):22S–31S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:469–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munechika T, Suzuki K, Nishiyama M, Ohashi M, Horie K. A comparison of the tensile bond strengths of composite resins to longitudinal and transverse sections of enamel prisms in human teeth. J Dent Res 1984;63:1079–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:1033–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dietschi D, Olsburgh S, Krejci I, Davidson C. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:73–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent 1993;21:39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe LG, Marshall GWJ, Marshall SJ. Dentin shear strength: effects of tubule orientation and intratooth location. Dent Mater 1996;12:109–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashley DH. Dentin: a dynamic substrate--a review. Scanning Microsc 1989;3:161–74; discussion 174–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santini A, Milia E. Microleakage around a low-shrinkage composite cured with a high-performance light. Am J Dent 2004;17:118–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005;16:21–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onisor I, Bouillaguet S, Krejci I. Influence of different surface treatments on marginal adaptation in enamel and dentin. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:297–303.
   Google Scholar
• Buonocore MG. Principles of adhesive retention and adhesive restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1963;67:382–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann N, Just N, Haller B, Hugo B, Klaiber B. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 1998;2:77–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsburgh S. Graduation thesis. Geneva: Geneva University; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional intermediate elastic layer. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:77–82.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Pelka M, Petschelt A. Internal adaptation and overhang formation of direct Class II resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig 1999;3:208–15.
   Google Scholar
• Caughman WF, Chan DC, Rueggeberg FA. Curing potential of dual-polymerizable resin cements in simulated clinical situations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:101–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:357–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga RR, Cesar PF, Gonzaga CC. Mechanical properties of resin cements with different activation modes. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:257–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan M, Cura C, Brendeke J. Effect of aging conditions on the repair bond strength of a microhybrid and a nanohybrid resin composite. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:451–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments. J Dent 2010;38:29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins. Clin Oral Investig 2010;15:625–633.
   Google Scholar
• Schulte AG, Vockler A, Reinhardt R. Longevity of ceramic inlays and onlays luted with a solely light-curing composite resin. J Dent 2005;33:433–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soh MS, Yap AU, Siow KS. The effectiveness of cure of LED and halogen curing lights at varying cavity depths. Oper Dent 2003;28:707–15.
   Google Scholar
• Besek M, Mormann WH, Persi C, Lutz F. The curing of composites under Cerec inlays. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1995;105:1123–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blackman R, Barghi N, Duke E. Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardash HS, Baharav H, Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. The effect of porcelain color on the hardness of luting composite resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:620–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent JM, Williams KB, Thomson WM, Williams SM. Dental restorations: a risk factor for periodontal attachment loss? J Clin Periodontol 2006;33:803–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paolantonio M, D'ercole S, Perinetti G, Tripodi D, Catamo G, Serra E, Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:200–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamin S. The biologic width—periodontal-restorative relationship. Singapore Dent J 1989;14:13–15.
   Google Scholar