Influence of surface treatment on the wear of solid zirconia

References

• Brostow W, Krieger RE, Malabar FL, Brostow W. Science of materials. Einstieg in die moderne Werkstoffwissenschaft. München: Hanser; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory-Head B, Curtis DA. Erosion caused by gastroesophageal reflux: diagnostic considerations. J Prosthodont 1997;6:278–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith BG, Bartlett DW, Robb ND. The prevalence, etiology and management of tooth wear in the United Kingdom. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:367–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Gee AJ, Pallav P, Davidson CL. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. J Dent Res 1986;65:654–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Young H, Jones J, Yang M, Anusavice KJ. In vivo - Wear of enamel by a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic used for posterior fixed partial dentures: first-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:391–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer W, van den Hoven F, Diedrich P. Wear in the upper and lower incisors in relation to incisal and condylar guidance. J Orofac Orthop 1997;58:306–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adahci LK, Saiki M, de Campos TN. An in vitro investigation of human enamel wear by restorative dental materials. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2001;249:465–8.
   Google Scholar
• Pigno MA, Hatch JP, Rodriguez-Garcia RC, Sakai S, Rugh JD. Severity, distribution, and correlates of occlusal tooth wear in a sample of Mexican-American and European-American adults. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung SY, Lee JW, Choi YJ, Ahn JS, Shin SW, Huh JB. A study on the in vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:111–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seghi RR, Rosenstiel SF, Bauer P. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro. J Dent Res 1991;70:221–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh W, DeLong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:451–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist--a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent Mater 2008;24:433–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monasky GE, Taylor DF. Studies on the wear of porcelain, enamel, and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:299–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson JD, Goldstein GR, Georgescu M. Enamel wear caused by three different restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:647–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on dentine. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:349–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap AU, Teoh SH, Hastings GW, Lu CS. Comparative wear ranking of dental restorative materials utilizing different wear simulation modes. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:574–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magne P, Oh WS, Pintado MR, DeLong R. Wear of enamel and veneering ceramics after laboratory and chairside finishing procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:669–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clelland NL, Agarwala V, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Wear of enamel opposing low-fusing and conventional ceramic restorative materials. J Prosthodont 2001;10:8–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kern M. Clinical long-term survival of two-retainer and single-retainer all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 2005;36:141–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. PartI. Pressable and alumina glass-infiltrated ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:441–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer von Clausbruch S. Vom Zirkonsand zur High-End Keramik. Das Dental-Labor 2009;51(7):1137–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrecht P, Bream M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 1989;68:1752–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosentritt M, Preis V, Behr M, Hahnel S, Handel G, Kolbeck C. Two body wear of dental porcelain and substructure oxide ceramics. Clin Oral Invest 2011;8:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Tambra TR, Razzoog ME, Lang BR, Wang RF, Lang BE. Wear of enamel opposing YPSZ zirconia core material with two surface finishes, wear of enamel opposing YPSZ Zirconia core material with two surface finishes. J Dent Res 2003; Abstract # 915.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein GR, Barnhard BR, Penugonda B. Profilometer, SEM, and visual assessment of porcealin polishing methods. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:627–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grieve AR, Jeffrey IW, Sharma SJ. An evaluation of three methods of polishing porcelain by comparison of surface topography with the original glaze. Restorative Dent 1991;7:34–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson CJ, McLundie AC, Stirrups DR, Taylor WG. Efficacy of a porcelain refinishing system in restoring surface finish after grinding with fine and extra-fine diamond burs. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:402–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Douglas HB Jr, Moon PC, Eshleman JR, Lutins ND. The occlusal dimensional change upon glazing porcelain. J Dent Res 1981;60:828–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of unglazed, glazed, and polished porcelain on human enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:320–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albashaireh Z, Ghazal M, Kern M. Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:105–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzmann JL. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:425–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baharav H, Laufer BZ, Pilo R, Cardash HS. Effect of glaze thickness on the fracture toughness and hardness of alumina-reinforced porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:515–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klausner LH, Cartwright CB, Charbeneau GT. Polished versus autoglazed porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:157–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison A. Wear of combination of acrylic resin and porcelain, on an abrasion testing machine. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5:111–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. A two-body frictional wear test. J Dent Res 1994;73:1546–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test. Dent Mater 1994;10:269–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazal M, Albashaireh ZS, Kern M. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:441–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghazal M, Kern M. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:342–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazal M, Kern M. Wear of human enamel and nano-filled composite resin denture teeth under different loading forces. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:58–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heintze SD, Zappini G, Rousson V. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators--results of a round robin test. Dent Mater 2005;21:304–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar