Time-dependent changes in DNA stability in decomposing teeth over 18 months

References

• Smith BC, Fisher DL, Weedn VW, Warnock GR, Holland MM. A systematic approach to the sampling of dental DNA. J Forensic Sci 1993;38:1194–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alonso A, Andelinović S, Martín P, Sutlović D, Erceg I, Huffine E. DNA typing from skeletal remains: evaluation of multiplex and megaplex STR systems on DNA isolated from bone and teeth samples. Croat Med J 2001;42:260–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaytmenn R, Sweet D. Quantification of forensic DNA from various regions of human teeth. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:622–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malaver PC, Yunis JJ. Different dental tissues as source of DNA for human identification in forensic cases. Croat Med J 2003;44:306–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira Da Silva R, da Rocha Pereira S, Daruge Júnior E, da Silva Sena Barcelo R, de Olveira Godignho NM, Souto R. Genetics and molecular biology: a literature review of forensic dentistry application. Braz J Oral Sci 2006;20:1254–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mundorff AZ, Bartelink EJ, Mar-Cash E. DNA preservation in skeletal elements from the World Trade Center disaster: recommendations for mass fatality management. J Forensic Sci 2009;54:739–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz TR, Schwartz EA, Mieszerski L, McNally L, Kobilinsky L. Characterization of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) obtained from teeth subjected to various environmental conditions. J Forensic Sci 1991;36:979–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvarez Garcia A, Munoz I, Pestoni C, Lareu MV, Rodriguez-Calvo MS, Carracedo A. Effect of environmental factors on PCR-DNA analysis from dental pulp. Int. J Legal Med 1996;109:125–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer H, Hühne J, Seitz B, Brinkmann B. Influence of soil storage and exposure period on DNA recovery from teeth. Int J Legal Med 1999;112:142–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coble MD, Butler JM. Characterization of new miniSTR loci to aid analysis of degraded DNA. J Forensic Sci 2005;50:43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin JA, Leney MD, Loreille O, Barrit SM, Christensen AF, Holland TD, et al. Application of low copy number STR typing to the identification of aged, degraded skeletal remains. J Forensic Sci 2007;52:1322–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Budowle B, Eisenberg AJ, van Daal A. Validity of low copy number typing and applications to forensic science. Croat Med J 2009;50:207–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward SR, King MJ, Chiu NM, Kuchar MJ, Griggs CW. Amplification of ancient nuclear DNA from teeth and soft tissues. PCR Methods Appl 1994;3:244–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricaut FX, Keyser-Tracqui C, Crubezy E, Ludes B. STR-genotyping from human medieval tooth and bone samples. Forensic Sci Int 2005;151:31–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pötsch L, Meyer U, Rothschild S, Schneider PM, Rittner CH. Application of DNA techniques for identification using human dental pulp as source of DNA. Int J Leg Med 1992;105:139–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobberstein RC, Juppertz J, von Wurmb-Schwark N, Ritz-Timmw S. Degradation of biomolecules in artificially and naturally aged teeth: implications for age estimation based on aspartic acid racemization and DNA analysis. Forensic Sci Int 2008;179:181–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobrino B, Brión M, Carracedo A. SNPs in forensic genetics: a review on SNP typing methodologies. Forensic Sci Int 2005;154:181–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler JM, Shen Y, McCord BR. The development of reduced size STR amplicons as tools for analysis of degraded DNA. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:1054–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender K, Farfan MJ, Schneider PM. Preparation of degraded human DNA under controlled conditions. Forensic Sci Int 2004;139:135–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung DT, Drabek J, Opel KL, Butler JM, McCord BR. A study on the effects of degradation and template concentration on the amplification efficiency of the STR Miniplex primer sets. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:733–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso A, Martin P, Albarrán C, Garcia P, Fernandez de Simon L, Jesús Iturralde M, et al. Challenges of DNA profiling in mass disaster investigations. Croat Med J 2005;46:540–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon LA, Dobbins AE, Pulker HK, Butler JM, Vallone PM, Coble MD, et al. Analysis of artificially degraded DNA using STRs and SNPs-results of a collaborative European (EDNAP) exercise. Forensic Sci Int 2006;164:33–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colotte M, Couallier V, Tuffet S, Bonnet J. Simultaneous assessment of average fragment size and amount in minute samples of degraded DNA. Anal Biochem 2009;388:345–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaeddini R, Walsh SJ, Abbas A. Forensic implications of genetic analyses from degraded DNA-A review. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2010;4:148–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckleton JS, Triggs CM, Walsh SJ. Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Rubio L, Martinez LJ, Martinez E, Martin-de-las-Heras S. Study of short- and long-term storage of teeth and its influence on DNA. J Forensic Sci 2009;54:1411–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tvedebrink T, Eriksen PS, Mogensen HS, Morling N. Statistical model for degraded DNA samples and adjusted probabilities for allelic drop-out. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2012;6:97–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quantifiler Kits, User's Manual. Foster City, CA: Applied Biosystems; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR Amplification Kit. User´s Manual. Foster City, CA: Applied Biosystems; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kaisser C, Bachmeier B, Conrad C, Nerlich A, Bratzke H, Einsenmenger W, et al. Molecular study of time dependent changes in DNA stability in soil buried skeletal residues. Forensic Sci Int 2008;177:32–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Leo D, Turrina S, Marigo M. Effects of individual dental factors on genomic DNA analysis. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2000;21:411–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tilotta F, Brousseau P, Lepareur E, Yasukawa K, Mazancourt P. A comparative study of two methods of dental pulp extraction for genetic fingerprint. Forensic Sci Int 2010;202:39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Tranasi M, Sberna MT, Zizzari V, D'Apolito G, Mastrangelo F, Salini L, et al. Microarray evaluation of age-related changes in human dental pulp. J Endod 2009;35:1211–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swango KL, Timken MD, Chong MD, Buoncristiani MR. A quantitative PCR assay for the assessment of DNA degradation in forensic samples. Forensic Sci Int 2006;158:14–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boy SC, Bernitz H, Van Heerden WF. Flow cytometric evaluation of postmortem pulp DNA degradation. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2003;24:123–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mandojana JM, Martin-de las Heras S, Valenzuela A, Valenzuela M, Luna JD. Differences in morphological age-related dental changes depending on postmortem interval. J Forensic Sci 2001;46:889–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frippiat C, Zorbo S, Leonard D, Marcotte A, Chaput M, Aelbrecht C, et al. Evaluation of novel forensic DNA storage methodologies. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2011;5:386–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee SB, Clabaugh KC, Silva B, Odigie KO, Coble MD, Loreille O, et al. Assessing a novel room temperature DNA storage medium for forensic biological samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2011;6:31–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar