The effect of LED curing mode on microleakage of Class V cavity restored by silorane-based composite

References

• Ferracane JL. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater 2000;21:36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Friedle KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Markle A. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations with and without soft start-polymerization. Oper Dent 2000;25:26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi RL, Wiltbank BD, Shah NC. Critical configuration analysis of four methods for measuring polymerization shrinkage strain of composites. Dent Mater 2000;20:388–96.
   Google Scholar
• Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann K-H. Physical Properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without “soft-start polymerization”. J Dent 1997;25:321–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. A light curing method for improving marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2001;17:359–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz E, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986;17:777–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unterbrink G, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as “filled adhesives”: literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 1999;30:249–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst CP, Brand N, Frommator U, Rippin G, Willerhausen B. Reduction of polymerization shrinkage stress and marginal microleakage using soft-start polymerization. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:93–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Sakaguchi RL, Condon JR. Reduction of polymerization contraction stress for dental composites by two-step light-activation. Dent Mater 2002;18:436–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eick JD, Kotha SP, Chappelow CC, Kilway KV, Giese GJ, Colaros AG, et al. Propeperties of silorane-based dental resins and composites containing a stress-reducing monomer. Dent Mater 2007;23:1011–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater 2005;21:68–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandewalle KS, Roberts HW, Tiba A, Charlton DG. Thermal emission and curing efficiency of LED and halogen lights. Oper Dent 2005;30:257–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett AW, Watts DC. Performance of two blue light-emitting – diode dental light curing units with distance and irradiation- time. Dent Mater 2004;20:72–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Jelen E, Hickel R. Is the soft-start polymerization concept still relevant for modern curing units?Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15:21–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi RL, Berge HX. Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites. J Dent 1998;26:695–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi RL, Wiltbank BD, Murchison CF. Contraction force rate of polymer composites is linearly correlated with irradiance. Dent Mater 2004;20:402–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, de Gee AG, Davidson CL. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 1995;103:322–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann N, Hiltl O, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Guidance of shrinkage vectors vs irradiation at reduced intensity for improving marginal seal of Class V resin-based composite restorations in vitro. Oper Dent 2002;27:510–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros GK, Aguir FH, Santos AJ, Lovadino JR. Effect of different intensity light curing modes on microleakage of two resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28:642–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalcaci A, Salbas M, Ulusoy N. The effect of soft-start vs continuous- light polymerization on microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:309–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obici AC, Sinhoreti MAC, de Goes MF, Consani S, Sobrinho LC. Effect of photo-activation method on polymerization shrinkage of restorative composites. Oper Dent 2002;27:192–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Jelen E, Clementino-Luedemann T, Hickel R. Low shrinkage composite for dental application. Dent Mater J 2007;26:149–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in Class V cavities. Am J Dent 2003;16:239–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calheiros FC, Sadek FT, Braga RR, Cardoso PE. Polymerization contraction stress of low-shrinkage composite and its correlation with microleakage in Class V restorations. J Dent 2004;32:407–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst CP, Kurschner R, Rippin G, Willershausen B. Stress reduction in resin-based composites cured with a two-step light curing unit. Am J Dent 2000;13:69–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts DC. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater 2000;16:292–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Soft-start polymerization and marginal gap formation in vitro. Am J Dent 2001;14:145–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann N, Siebrecht C, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Influence of curing methods and materials on the marginal seal of Class V composite restorations in vitro. Oper Dent 2003;28:160–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral CM, Peris AR, Ambrosano GM, Pimento LAF. Microleakage and gap formation of resin composite restorations polymerized with different techniques. Am J Dent 2004;17:156–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. The effect of light-curing modes on the microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. J Dent 2004;32:247–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming GJP, Cara RR, Palin WM, Bwke FJT. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with resin-based filling materials cured using a ‘soft-start’ polymerization protocol. Dent Mater 2007;23:637–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouschlicher MR, Rueggeberg FA, Boyer DB. Effect of stepped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photoactivated composite. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:23–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Visvanathan A, Ilie N, Hickel R, Kunzerlmann K-H. The influence of curing times and light curing methods on the polymerization shrinkage stress of a shrinkage-optimized composite with hybrid-type prepolymer fillers. Dent Mater 2007;23:777–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts DC, al Hindi A. Intrinsic soft-start polymerization shrinkage-kinetics in an acrylate-based resin composite. Dent Mater 1999;15:39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knezevic A, Sariri K, Sovic I, Demoli N, Talre Z. Shrinkage evaluation of composite polymerized with LED units using laser interferometry. Quintessence Int 2010;41:417–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Hickel R. Silorane-based dental composite: behavior and abilities. Dent Mater J 2006;25:445–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min SH, Ferracane J, Lee IB. Effect of shrinkage strain, modulus, and instrument compliance on polymerization shrinkage stress of light – cured composites during the initial curing stage. Dent Mater 2010;26:1024–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts DC, Wahbi MA. Shrinkage-stress kinetics of silorane versus dimethacrylate resin-composite.J Dent Res 2005;84:(special issue A):abstr. no. 2680.
   Google Scholar
• Marchesi G, Breschi L, Antoniolli F, Lenarda RD, Ferracane J, Cadenaro M. Contraction stress of Low-shrinkage composite materials assessed with different testing system. Dent Mater 2010;26:947–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadagiannis D, Kakaboura A, Palaghias G, Eliades G. Setting characteristics and cavity adaptation of low-shrinkage resin composites. Dent Mater 2009;25:1509–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Nathwani H, Burke FJ, Randall RC. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrinkage dental composites. Dent Mater 2005;21:324–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaro LCC, Goncalves F, Guimaraes TC, Ferracane JL, Versluis A, Braga RR. Polymerization stress, shrinkage and elastic modulus of current low-shrinkage restorative composites. Dent Mater 2010;26:1144–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ernst C-P, Galler P, Willershausen B, Haller B. Marginal integrity of Class V restorations: SEM versus dye penetration. Dent Mater 2008;24:319–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamazaki PC, Bedran – Russo AK, Pereira PN, Wsift JTEJ. Microleakage evaluation of a new low-shrinkage composite restorative material. Oper Dent 2006;31:670–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagis XH, Baltacioglu IH, KahyaogullariS. Comparing microleakage and the layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in wide Class II MOD cavities. Oper Dent 2009;34:578–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Alpino PHP, Bechtold J, dos santos PJ, Alonso RCB, Di Hipolito V, Silikas N. Methacrylate-and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose. Dent Mater 2011;27:1162–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mine A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Kuboki T, Yoshida Y, et al. TEM characterization of a silorane composite bonded to enamel/dentin. Dent Mater 2010;26:524–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krifka S, Federlin M, Hiller K-N, Schmalz G. Microleakage of Silorane- and Methacrylate-based class V composite restorations. Clin Oral Invest 2011;16:1117–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud SH, Al-wakeel Eel S. Marginal adaptation of ormocer-, Silorane-, and Methacrylate-based composite restorative systems bonded to dentin cavities after water storage. Quintessence Int 2011;42:e131–9.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ende A, De Munck J, Mine A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Does a low-shrinkage composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface? Dent Mater 2010;26:215–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ende A, Mine A, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of low- shrinkage composites in high c-factor cavities. J Dent 2012;40:295–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar