A 5-year retrospective case series evaluating Brånemark Integration BioHelix^™dental implants placed in a private practice by a specialist

References

• Esposito M, Hirsch J M, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:527–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikner SS, Grondahl K, Jemt T, Friberg B. Marginal bone loss at implants: a retrospective, long-term follow-up of turned Branemark System implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:11–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito M, Murray-Curtis L, Grusovin M, Coulthard P, Worthington H. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsson M, Esposito M. A retrospective case series evaluating Brånemark BioHelix implants placed in a specialist private practice following “conventional” procedures. One-year results after placement. Eur J Oral Implantol 2008;1:229–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Gröndahl K, Albrektsson T. A qualitative and quantitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-year retrospective analysis of the Brånemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:504–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan E, Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmquist A. On a novel technique for preparation and analysis of the implant surface and its interface to bone. Sahlgrenska Academy. Göteborg: University of Gothenburg; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Palmquist A, Emanuelsson L, Brånemark R, Thomsen P. Biomechanical, histological and ultrastructural analyses of laser micro- and nano-structured titanium implant after 6 months in rabbit. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2011;97:289–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brånemark R, Emanuelsson L, Palmquist A, Thomsen P. Bone response to laser-induced micro- and nano-size titanium surface features. Nanomedicine 2011;7:220–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho S, Jung S. A removal torque of the laser-treated titanium implants in rabbit tibia. Biomaterials 2003;24:4859–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgren C, Reimers H, Chakarov D, Gold J, Wennerberg A. An in vivo study of bone response to implants topographically modified by laser micromachining. Biomaterials 2003;24:701–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faeda R, Tavares H, Sartori R, Guastaldi A, Marcantonio EJ. Evaluation of titanium implants with surface modification by laser beam. Biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Braz Oral Res 2009;23:137–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliveira N, Guastaldi F, Perrotti V, Hochuli-Vieira E, Guastaldi A, Piattelli A, et al. Biomedical Ti-Mo Alloys with surface machined and modified by laser beam: biomechanical, histological, and histometric analysis in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00354.x. [Epub ahead of print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito M, Worthington H, Coulthard P. In search of truth: the role of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation with oral implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:6278.
   Google Scholar
• Ekelund JA, Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: a prospective study on Branemark system implants over more than 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:602–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friberg B, Jemt T. Clinical experience of TiUnite implants: a 5-year cross-sectional, retrospective follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:e95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Balshe AA, Assad DA, Eckert SE, Koka S, Weaver AL. A retrospective study of the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:1113–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotfredsen K, Karlsson U. A prospective 5-year study of fixed partial prostheses supported by implants with machined and TiO2-blasted surface. J Prosthodont 2001;10:2–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Grondahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Branemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:413–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buddula A, Assad DA, Salinas TJ, Garces YI, Volz JE, Weaver AL. Survival of turned and roughened dental implants in irradiated head and neck cancer patients: a retrospective analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:290–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Thomsen P, Worthington HV. A 5-year follow-up comparative analysis of the efficacy of various osseointegrated dental implant systems: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:557–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito M, Koukoulopoulu A, Coulthard P, Worthington H. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate, immediate-delayed and delayed implants). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito M, Grusovin M, Talati M, Coulthard P, Oliver R, Worthington H. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: antibiotics at dental implant placement to prevent complications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito M, Grusovin M, Willings M, Coulthard P, Worthington H. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2007.
   Google Scholar