Effect of the implant–abutment interface on peri-implant tissues: A systematic review

References

• Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merz BR, Sutter F, Lang N. Implant dentistry–development and current focus. Technol Health Care 1997;5:191–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:66–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelund JA, Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: a prospective study on Branemark system implants over more than 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:602–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:635–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis M, Klineberg I. Prosthodontic considerations designed to optimize outcomes for single-tooth implants. A review of the literature. Aust Dent J 2011;56:181–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creugers NH, Kreulen CM, Snoek PA, de Kanter RJ. A systematic review of single-tooth restorations supported by implants. J Dent 2000;28:209–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt A, Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants for single-tooth replacement. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:197–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:81–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:212–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:712–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konig Junior B, de Carvalho Lopes C. Bone remodeling analysis after placement of dental implants using polyfluorochrome sequential labeling. Ann Anat 2002;184:241–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo MG, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:606–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:615–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada J. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:31–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigdon H, Machtei EE. The dimensions of keratinized mucosa around implants affect clinical and immunological parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:387–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappiello M, Luongo R, Di Iorio D, Bugea C, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:347–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myshin HL, Wiens JP. Factors affecting soft tissue around dental implants: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:440–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespi R, Cappare P, Gherlone E. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels around platform-switched and non-platform-switched implants used in an immediate loading protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:920–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz PO, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:721–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung RE, Sailer I, Hammerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;27:251–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:635–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(Suppl):43–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sclar AG. Strategies for management of single-tooth extraction sites in aesthetic implant therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:90–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small PN, Tarnow DP. Gingival recession around implants: a 1-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:527–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A. 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387–416.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Treves C, Martinesi M, Stio M, Gutierrez A, Jimenez JA, Lopez MF. In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of surface-modified titanium alloys. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;92:1623–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Hammerle CH, Mattiola A. Single-tooth implant reconstructions: esthetic factors influencing the decision between titanium and zirconia abutments in anterior regions. Eur J Esthet Dent 2007;2:296–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakamura K, Kanno T, Milleding P, Ortengren U. Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressan E, Paniz G, Lops D, Corazza B, Romeo E, Favero G. Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:631–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Bossmann K, Kern M. In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:875–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, Medina RU, Oates TW, Schenk RK, et al. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2003;82:232–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosper L, Redaelli S, Pasi M, Zarone F, Radaelli G, Gherlone EF. A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative crestal bone loss. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:299–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohrle PS. Nobel Perfect esthetic scalloped implant: rationale for a new design. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:64–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rompen E, Raepsaet N, Domken O, Touati B, Van Dooren E. Soft tissue stability at the facial aspect of gingivally converging abutments in the esthetic zone: a pilot clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:S119–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:428–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker W, Ochsenbein C, Tibbetts L, Becker BE. Alveolar bone anatomic profiles as measured from dry skulls. Clinical ramifications. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:727–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeo E, Lops D, Rossi A, Storelli S, Rozza R, Chiapasco M. Surgical and prosthetic management of interproximal region with single-implant restorations: 1-year prospective study. J Periodontol 2008;79:1048–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung RE, Holderegger C, Sailer I, Khraisat A, Suter A, Hammerle CH. The effect of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:357–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE, Hammerle CH. Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:802–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson B, Glauser R, Maglione M, Taylor A. Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:640–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigolo P, Givani A, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. A 4-year prospective study to assess peri-implant hard and soft tissues adjacent to titanium versus gold-alloy abutments in cemented single implant crowns. J Prosthodont 2006;15:250–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Scharer P. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:285–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner DM. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. N Y State Dent J 2005;71:34–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trammell K, Geurs NC, O'Neal SJ, Liu PR, Haigh SJ, McNeal S, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of platform-switched and matched-abutment implants in short-span partial denture situations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:599–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canullo L, Goglia G, Iurlaro G, Iannello G. Short-term bone level observations associated with platform switching in immediately placed and restored single maxillary implants: a preliminary report. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:277–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fickl S, Zuhr O, Stein JM, Hurzeler MB. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:577–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, Jepsen S. Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a randomized-controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:115–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurzeler M, Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel HC. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:33–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielbassa AM, Martinez-de Fuentes R, Goldstein M, Arnhart C, Barlattani A, Jackowski J, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing a variable-thread novel tapered and a standard tapered implant: interim one-year results. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:293–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigolo P, Givani A. Platform-switched restorations on wide-diameter implants: a 5-year clinical prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:103–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canullo L, Iurlaro G, Iannello G. Double-blind randomized controlled trial study on post-extraction immediately restored implants using the switching platform concept: soft tissue response. Preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:414–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enkling N, Johren P, Klimberg V, Bayer S, Mericske-Stern R, Jepsen S. Effect of platform switching on peri-implant bone levels: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1185–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Hartog L, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B, Tymstra N, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Single implants with different neck designs in the aesthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1289–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelken R, Kunkel M, Jung BA, Wagner W. Immediate nonfunctional loading of nobelperfect implants in the anterior dental arch in Private Practice – 5–Year Data. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; [ Epub ahead of print]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul S, Held U. Immediate supracrestal implant placement with immediate temporization in the anterior dentition: a retrospective study of 31 implants in 26 patients with up to 5.5-years follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:710–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needleman IG. A guide to systematic reviews. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:6–9; discussion 37–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB, Carr AB, Naert I, Wennerberg A. Quality of dental implants. Int Dent J 2003;53:409–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennstrom JL, Bengazi F, Lekholm U. The influence of the masticatory mucosa on the peri-implant soft tissue condition. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:537–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao RT, Fagan MC, Conte GJ. Thick vs. thin gingival biotypes: a key determinant in treatment planning for dental implants. J Calif Dent Assoc 2008;36:193–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol 2003;74:557–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorni-Broker M, Penarrocha-Diago M. Factors that influence the position of the peri-implant soft tissues: a review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:e475–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu JH, Lee A, Wang HL. Influence of tissue biotype on implant esthetics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:499–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DR, Mealey BL, Verrett RG, Mills MP, Noujeim ME, Lasho DJ, et al. Relationship between clinical periodontal biotype and labial plate thickness: an in vivo study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011;31:345–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A, Fu JH, Wang HL. Soft tissue biotype affects implant success. Implant Dent 2011;20:e38–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John CK. Altering gingival levels: The Restorative Connection Part I: biologic variables. J Esthet Restorative Dent 1994;6:3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kois JC. Predictable single-tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2004;25:895–6; 898, 900 passim; quiz 906–897.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garber DA, Salama MA, Salama H. Immediate total tooth replacement. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22:210–16; 218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanavi F, Weisgold AS, Rose LF. Biologic width and its relation to periodontal biotypes. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:157–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higginbottom FL, Wilson TG Jr. Three-dimensional templates for placement of root-form dental implants: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:787–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salama H, Salama MA, Li TF, Garber DA, Adar P. Treatment planning 2000: an esthetically oriented revision of the original implant protocol. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:55–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrion JB, Barbosa IR. Single implant-supported restorations in the anterior maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:149–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eger T, Muller HP, Heinecke A. Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:839–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilderman MN, Pennel BM, King K, Barron JM. Histogenesis of repair following osseous surgery. J Periodontol 1970;41:551–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misch CE, Dietsh-Misch F, Hoar J, Beck G, Hazen R, Misch CM. A bone quality-based implant system: first year of prosthetic loading. J Oral Implantol 1999;25:185–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Astrand P, Engquist B, Anzen B, Bergendal T, Hallman M, Karlsson U, et al. A three-year follow-up report of a comparative study of ITI Dental Implants and Branemark System implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:130–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moberg LE, Kondell PA, Sagulin GB, Bolin A, Heimdahl A, Gynther GW. Branemark System and ITI Dental Implant System for treatment of mandibular edentulism. A comparative randomized study: 3-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:450–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateli M, Att W, Strub JR. Implant neck configurations for preservation of marginal bone level: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:290–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redemagni M, Cremonesi S, Garlini G, Maiorana C. Soft tissue stability with immediate implants and concave abutments. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:328–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopez-Mari L, Calvo-Guirado JL, Martin-Castellote B, Gomez-Moreno G, Lopez-Mari M. Implant platform switching concept: an updated review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:e450–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenberg B, Froum SJ. Prospective study of 94 platform-switched implants observed from 1992 to 2006. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veis A, Parissis N, Tsirlis A, Papadeli C, Marinis G, Zogakis A. Evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss using modified abutment connections at various crestal level placements. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:609–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atieh MA, Ibrahim HM, Atieh AH. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2010;81:1350–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt RL, Rosenberg MM, Zinser PJ, Ganeles J. A concept for a biologically derived, parabolic implant design. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:473–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadhia MH, Holt RL. A new implant design for optimal esthetics and retention of interproximal papillae. Implant Dent 2003;12:164–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bengazi F, Wennstrom JL, Lekholm U. Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2-year longitudinal prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:303–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardaropoli G, Lekholm U, Wennstrom JL. Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:165–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:971–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte GJ, Rhodes P, Richards D, Kao RT. Considerations for anterior implant esthetics. J Calif Dent Assoc 2002;30:528–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jovanovic SA. Esthetic therapy with standard and scalloped implant designs: the five biologic elements for success. J Calif Dent Assoc 2005;33:873–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soadoun AP, Touati B. Soft tissue recession around implants: is it still unavoidable?–Part II. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2007;19:81–7; quiz 88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scarano A, Piattelli M, Vrespa G, Caputi S, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on titanium nitride-coated and uncoated implants: an in vivo human study. J Oral Implantol 2003;29:80–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan PL, Dunne JT Jr. An esthetic comparison of a metal ceramic crown and cast metal abutment with an all-ceramic crown and zirconia abutment: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:215–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bachle M, Strub JR. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment. J Periodontol 2004;75:1262–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkevicius T, Apse P. Influence of abutment material on stability of peri-implant tissues: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:449–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimondini L, Cerroni L, Carrassi A, Torricelli P. Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:793–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsson I, Cardaropoli G. Peri-implant hard and soft tissue integration to dental implants made of titanium and gold. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:269–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothdurft FP, Pospiech PR. Zirconium dioxide implant abutments for posterior single-tooth replacement: first results. J Periodontol 2009;80:2065–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luongo R, Traini T, Guidone PC, Bianco G, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Hard and soft tissue responses to the platform-switching technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:551–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibart S, Warbington M, Su MF, Skobe Z. In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: the locking taper system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:732–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farronato D, Santoro G, Canullo L, Botticelli D, Maiorana C, Lang NP. Establishment of the epithelial attachment and connective tissue adaptation to implants installed under the concept of "platform switching": a histologic study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:90–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowzari H, Chee W, Yi K, Pak M, Chung WH, Rich S. Scalloped dental implants: a retrospective analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes of 17 NobelPerfect implants in 6 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vela X, Mendez V, Rodriguez X, Segala M, Tarnow DP. Crestal bone changes on platform-switched implants and adjacent teeth when the tooth-implant distance is less than 1.5 mm. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012;32:149–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dursun E, Tulunoglu I, Canpinar P, Uysal S, Akalin FA, Tozum TF. Are marginal bone levels and implant stability/mobility affected by single-stage platform switched dental implants? A comparative clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1161–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar