Effect of engraving speeds of CO₂ laser irradiation on in-ceram alumina roughness: a pilot study

References

• Aksoy G, Polat H, Polat M, Coskun G. Effect of various treatment and glazing (coating) techniques on the roughness and wettability of ceramic dental restorative surfaces. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2006;53:254–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guazzato M, Albakry M, Quach L, Swain MV. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of a glass-infiltrated alumina/zirconia-reinforced dental ceramic. Dent Mater 2001;21:454–63.
   Google Scholar
• Jedynakiewicz NM, Martin N. The effect of surface coating on the bond strength of machinable ceramics. Biomaterials 2001;22:749–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges GA, Sophr AM, De Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:479–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersu B, Yuzugullu B, Yazıcı A, Canay S. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J Dent 2009;37:848–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederich R, Kern M. Resin bond strength to densely sintered alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:333–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan M, Alkumru M, Gemalmaz D. The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:335–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern M, Thompson VP. Effects of sandblasting and silica-coating procedures on pure titanium. J Dent 1994;22:300–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silveira BL, Paglia A, Burnett LH, Shinkai RS, Eduardo de P, Spohr AM. Micro-tensile bond strength between a resin cement and an aluminous ceramic treated with Nd:YAG laser, Rocatec System, or aluminum oxide sandblasting. Photomed Laser Surg 2005;23:543–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick RM. Lasers in dentistry: where we are today. Dent Today 2000;9:50–3.
   Google Scholar
• Maiman TH. Stimulated optical radiation in ruby. Nature 1960;187:493–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Convissar RA, Goldstein EE. A combined carbon dioxide/erbium laser for soft and hard tissue procedures. Dent Today 2001;20:66–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abdallah RM, Hammouda IM, Kamal M, Abouelatta OB, Abd El-Salamd A. Evaluation of hardness, surface morphology and structure of laser irradiated ceramics. J Ovonic Res 2010;6:227–38.
   Google Scholar
• Akova T, Yoldas O, Toroglu MS, Uysal H. Porcelain surface treatment by laser for bracket-porcelain bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:630–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osorio E, Toledano M, Da Silveira BL, Osorio R. Effect of different surface treatments on In-Ceram Alumina roughness: an AFM study. J Dent 2010;38:118–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobberstein H, Hobbertein H, Schwarz A, Zuhrt R, Tanı Y. Laser processing of dental materials lasers in dentistry. London: Elsevier Science; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Pouchou JL, Boivin D, Beauchene P, Le Besnerais G, Vignon F. 3D reconstruction of rough surfaces by SEM stereo imaging. Mikrochim Acta 2002;139:135–44.
   Google Scholar
• De Oliveira LR, Silva FD, Nazar AMM, Ammann JJ. Three-dimensional reconstruction of fracture surfaces: area matching algorithms for automatic parallax measurements. Scanning 1999;21:253–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ersoy O. Surface area and volume measurements of volcanic ash particles by SEM stereoscopic imaging. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 2010;190:290–6.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Z, Dikin DA, Ding W, Qiao Y, Chen X, Fridman Y, et al. Three-dimensional representation of curved nanowires. J Microsc 2004;216:206–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thong JTL, Breton BC. A topography measurement instrument based on the scanning electron-microscope. Rev Sci Instrum 1992;63:131–8.
   Google Scholar
• Minnich B, Leeb H, Bernroider EWN, Lametschwandtner A. Three-dimensional morphometry in scanning electron microscopy: a technique for accurate dimensional and angular measurements of microstructures using stereopaired digitized images and digital image analysis. J Microsc 1999;195:23–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein J, Newbury D, Joy D, Lyman C, Echlin P, Lifshin E, et al. Scanning electron microscopy and x-ray microanalysis. New York: Springer Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Schroettner H, Schmied M, Scherer S. Comparison of 3D surface reconstruction data from certified depth standards obtained by SEM and an infinite focus measurement machine (IFM). Microchimica Acta 2006;155:279–84.
   Google Scholar
• Ersoy O, Aydar E, Gourgaud A, Bayhan H. Quantitative analysis on volcanic ash surfaces: application of extended depth-of-field (focus) algorithm for light and scanning electron microscopy and 3D reconstruction. Micron 2008;39:128–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geometrical product specification (GPS)-Surface texture: profile method-terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. 2004. TS6956.
   Google Scholar
• Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)-Surface texture: profile methodterms, definitions and surface texture parameters. 2000. ISO4287.
   Google Scholar
• Ural C, Kalyoncuoglu E, Balkaya V. The effect of different power outputs of carbon dioxide laser on bonding between zirconia ceramic surface and resin cement. Acta Odontol Scand 2011;70:541–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nalbantgil D, Oztoprak MO, Tozlu M, Arun T. Effects of different application durations of ER:YAG laser on intrapulpal temperature change during debonding. Lasers Med Sci 2011;26:735–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar