Surface properties correlated with the human gingival fibroblasts attachment on various materials for implant abutments: A multiple regression analysis

References

• Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz PO, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:721–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Moon IS, Lindhe J. Peri-implant tissues at submerged and non-submerged titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:600–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:212–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsson I, Cardaropoli G. Peri-implant hard and soft tissue integration to dental implants made of titanium and gold. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:269–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM. Titanium-coated micromachined grooves of different dimensions affect epithelial and connective-tissue cells differently in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:1203–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degidi M, Artese L, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Gehrke P, Piattelli A. Inflammatory infiltrate, microvessel density, nitric oxide synthase expression, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and proliferative activity in peri-implant soft tissues around titanium and zirconium oxide healing caps. J Periodontol 2006;77:73–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisenbarth E, Meyle J, Nachtigall W, Breme J. Influence of the surface structure of titanium materials on the adhesion of fibroblasts. Biomaterials 1996;17:1399–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hormia M, Kononen M. Immunolocalization of fibronectin and vitronectin receptors in human gingival fibroblasts spreading on titanium surfaces. J Periodontal Res 1994;29:146–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hormia M, Kononen M, Kivilahti J, Virtanen I. Immunolocalization of proteins specific for adhaerens junctions in human gingival epithelial cells grown on differently processed titanium surfaces. J Periodontal Res 1991;26:491–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bachle M, Strub JR. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment. J Periodontol 2004;75:1262–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 1–review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen CM, Papaioanno W, Van Eldere J, Schepers E, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:201–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:169–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim K, Lee BA, Piao XH, Chung HJ, Kim YJ. Surface characteristics and bioactivity of an anodized titanium surface. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2013;43:198–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee YJ, Cui DZ, Jeon HR, Chung HJ, Park YJ, Kim OS, et al. Surface characteristics of thermally treated titanium surfaces. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2012;42:81–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rompen E, Domken O, Degidi M, Pontes AE, Piattelli A. The effect of material characteristics, of surface topography and of implant components and connections on soft tissue integration: a literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:55–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampin M, Warocquier C, Legris C, Degrange M, Sigot-Luizard MF. Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability, cell adhesion, and cell migration. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:99–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL, et al. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:49–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mabboux F, Ponsonnet L, Morrier JJ, Jaffrezic N, Barsotti O. Surface free energy and bacterial retention to saliva-coated dental implant materials–an in vitro study. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2004;39:199–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:68–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloss FR, Steinmuller-Nethl D, Stigler RG, Ennemoser T, Rasse M, Hachl O. In vivo investigation on connective tissue healing to polished surfaces with different surface wettability. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:699–705.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quirynen M, Vogels R, Peeters W, van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Haffajee A. Dynamics of initial subgingival colonization of ’pristine’ peri-implant pockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:25–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumhammers A, Langkamp HH, Matta RK, Kilbury K. Scanning electron microscopy of epithelial cells grown on enamel, glass and implant materials. J Periodontol 1978;49:592–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Carmine M, Toto P, Feliciani C, Scarano A, Tulli A, Strocchi R, et al. Spreading of epithelial cells on machined and sandblasted titanium surfaces: an in vitro study. J Periodontol 2003;74:289–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raisanen L, Kononen M, Juhanoja J, Varpavaara P, Hautaniemi J, Kivilahti J, et al. Expression of cell adhesion complexes in epithelial cells seeded on biomaterial surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;49:79–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:635–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altankov G, Grinnell F, Groth T. Studies on the biocompatibility of materials: fibroblast reorganization of substratum-bound fibronectin on surfaces varying in wettability. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:385–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruardy TG, Schakenraad JM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Adhesion and spreading of human skin fibroblasts on physicochemically characterized gradient surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1415–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb K, Hlady V, Tresco PA. Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41:422–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Ha HJ, Ko YK, Yoon SJ, Rhee JM, Kim MS, et al. Correlation of proliferation, morphology and biological responses of fibroblasts on LDPE with different surface wettability. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2007;18:609–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar