Ultraviolet-C irradiation to titanium implants increases peri-implant bone formation without impeding mineralization in a rabbit femur model

References

• Sennerby L, Ericson LE, Thomsen P, Lekholm U, Astrand P. Structure of the bone-titanium interface in retrieved clinical oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:103–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Ultrastructure of the bone-titanium interface in rabbits. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1992;3:262–71.
   Google Scholar
• Natali AN, Pavan PG, Ruggero AL. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:67–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demenko V, Linetskiy I, Nesvit K, Shevchenko A. Ultimate masticatory force as a criterion in implant selection. J Dent Res 2011;90:1211–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:671–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:401–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon KH, Kim SG, Lee JH, Suh SW. 3D finite element analysis of changes in stress levels and distributions for an osseointegrated implant after vertical bone loss. Implant Dent 2011;20:354–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitagawa T, Tanimoto Y, Nemoto K, Aida M. Influence of cortical bone quality on stress distribution in bone around dental implant. Dent Mater J 2005;24:219–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aita H, Hori N, Takeuchi M, Suzuki T, Yamada M, Anpo M, et al. The effect of ultraviolet functionalization of titanium on integration with bone. Biomaterials 2009;30:1015–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueno T, Yamada M, Hori N, Suzuki T, Ogawa T. Effect of ultraviolet photoactivation of titanium on osseointegration in a rat model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:287–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueno T, Yamada M, Suzuki T, Minamikawa H, Sato N, Hori N, et al. Enhancement of bone-titanium integration profile with UV-photofunctionalized titanium in a gap healing model. Biomaterials 2010;31:1546–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cells Mater 2007;13:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIH consensus development panel on osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 2001;285:785–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter DR, Hayes WC. Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. Science 1976;194:1174–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda S, Tsurukami H, Ito M, Sakai A, Sakata T, Nishida S, et al. Effect of trabecular bone contour on ultimate strength of lumbar vertebra after bilateral ovariectomy in rats. Bone 2001;28:625–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katsumata T, Nakamura T, Ohnishi H, Sakurama T. Intermittent cyclical etidronate treatment maintains the mass, structure and the mechanical property of bone in ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:921–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butz F, Ogawa T, Chang TL, Nishimura I. Three-dimensional bone-implant integration profiling using micro-computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:687–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morioka T, Matsunaga S, Yoshinari M, Ide Y, Nakano T, Sekine H, et al. Alignment of biological apatite crystallites at first molar in human mandible cortical bone. Cranio 2012;30:32–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aita H, Att W, Ueno T, Yamada M, Hori N, Iwasa F, et al. Ultraviolet light-mediated photofunctionalization of titanium to promote human mesenchymal stem cell migration, attachment, proliferation and differentiation. Acta Biomater 2009;5:3247–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Att W, Hori N, Iwasa F, Yamada M, Ueno T, Ogawa T. The effect of UV-photofunctionalization on the time-related bioactivity of titanium and chromium-cobalt alloys. Biomaterials 2009;30:4268–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hori N, Ueno T, Suzuki T, Yamada M, Att W, Okada S, et al. Ultraviolet light treatment for the restoration of age-related degradation of titanium bioactivity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:49–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iwasa F, Hori N, Ueno T, Minamikawa H, Yamada M, Ogawa T. Enhancement of osteoblast adhesion to UV-photofunctionalized titanium via an electrostatic mechanism. Biomaterials 2010;31:2717–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miyauchi T, Yamada M, Yamamoto A, Iwasa F, Suzawa T, Kamijo R, et al. The enhanced characteristics of osteoblast adhesion to photofunctionalized nanoscale TiO2 layers on biomaterials surfaces. Biomaterials 2010;31:3827–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butz F, Aita H, Wang CJ, Ogawa T. Harder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titanium. J Dent Res 2006;85:560–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaval L, Liu F, Roche P, Aubin JE. Kinetics of osteoprogenitor proliferation and osteoblast differentiation in vitro. J Cell Biochem 1999;74:616–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein GS, Lian JB, Owen TA. Relationship of cell growth to the regulation of tissue-specific gene expression during osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J 1990;4:3111–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada M, Miyauchi T, Yamamoto A, Iwasa F, Takeuchi M, Anpo M, et al. Enhancement of adhesion strength and cellular stiffness of osteoblasts on mirror-polished titanium surface by UV-photofunctionalization. Acta Biomater 2010;6:4578–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohtsu N, Masahashi N, Mizukoshi Y, Wagatsuma K. Hydrocarbon decomposition on a hydrophilic TiO2 surface by UV irradiation: spectral and quantitative analysis using in-situ XPS technique. Langmuir 2009;25:11586–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uchiyama H, Yamada M, Ishizaki K, Sakurai K. Specific ultraviolet-C irradiation energy for functionalization of titanium surface to increase osteoblastic cellular attachment. J Biomater Appl 2014;28:1419–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petzold C, Monjo M, Rubert M, Reinholt FP, Gomez-Florit M, Ramis JM, et al. Effect of proline-rich synthetic peptide-coated titanium implants on bone healing in a rabbit model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:e547–55.
   Google Scholar
• Sawase T, Jimbo R, Wennerberg A, Suketa N, Tanaka Y, Atsuta M. A novel characteristic of porous titanium oxide implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:680–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taborelli M, Jobin M, Francois P, Vaudaux P, Tonetti M, Szmukler-Moncler S, et al. Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium. (I) Surface characterization. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:208–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanawa T. A comprehensive review of techniques for biofunctionalization of titanium. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2011;41:263–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson MA, White JM, Uetsuka H, Onishi H. Photochemical charge transfer and trapping at the interface between an organic adlayer and an oxide semiconductor. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:14974–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider GB, English A, Abraham M, Zaharias R, Stanford C, Keller J. The effect of hydrogel charge density on cell attachment. Biomaterials 2004;25:3023–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funato A, Ogawa T. Photofunctionalized dental implants: a case series in compromised bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:1589–601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki S, Kobayashi H, Ogawa T. Implant stability change and osseointegration speed of immediately loaded photofunctionalized implants. Implant Dent 2013;22:481–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar