Reimbursement systems influence prosthodontic treatment of adult patients

References

• Henley E. Pay-for-performance: what can you expect? J Fam Pract 2005;54:609–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hennig-Schmidt H, Selten R, Wiesen D. How payment systems affect physicians’ provision behaviour -an experimental investigation. J Health Econ 2011;30:637–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flodgren G, Eccles MP, Shepperd S, Scott A, Parmelli E, Beyer FR. An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009255. accessed 2014-10-30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosden T, Sibbald B, Williams J, Petchey R, Leese B. Paying doctors by salary: a controlled study of general practitioner behaviour in England. Health Policy 2003;64:415–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellinger FJ. The impact of financial incentives on physician behavior in managed care plans: a review of the evidence. Med Care Res Rev 1996;53:294–314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Safran DG, Rogers WH, Tarlov AR, Inui T, Taira DA, Montgomery JE, et al. Organizational and financial characteristics of health plans: are they related to primary care performance? Arch Intern Med 2000;160:69–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Croxson B, Hanney S, Buxton M. Routine monitoring of performance: what makes health research and development different? J Health Serv Res Policy 2001;6:226–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devlin RA, Sarma S. Do physician remuneration schemes matter? The case of Canadian family physicians. J Health Econ 2008;27:1168–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaynor M, Pauly M. Compensation and productivity efficiency of partnerships: evidence from medical group practice. J Pol Econ 1990;98:544–73.
   Google Scholar
• Gosden T, Forland F, Kristiansen IS, Sutton M, Leese B, Giuffrida A, et al. Impact of payment method on behaviour of primary care physicians: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2001;6:44–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hurley J, Labelle R. Relative fees and the utilization of physicians’ services in Canada. Health Econ 1995;4:419–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grytten J, Sorensen R. Type of contract and supplier-induced demand for primary physicians in Norway. J Health Econ 2001;20:379–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmert M, Eijkenaar F, Kemter H, Esslinger AS, Schoffski O. Economic evaluation of pay-for-performance in health care: a systematic review. Eur J Health Econ 2012;13:755–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tickle M, McDonald R, Franklin J, Aggarwal VR, Milsom K, Reeves D. Paying for the wrong kind of performance? Financial incentives and behaviour changes in National Health Service dentistry 1992-2009. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2011;39:465–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woods N, Considine J, Lucey S, Whelton H, Nyhan T. The influence of economic incentives on treatment patterns in a third-party funded dental service. Community Dent Health 2010;27:18–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Handbok till TLVFS 2013:2 om statligt tandvårdsstöd, version 5.1 (in Swedish). Stockholm: The Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency; 2013. Available from at http://www.tlv.se/Upload/Tandvard/Dokument/Handbok-version-5.1.pdf. accessed 2014-10-30.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen J, Woods N, Whelton H. Do economic incentives influence the provision of dental services in a third-party funded dental scheme. J OA Dent 2013;1:7.
   Google Scholar
• Woods N. The role of payments systems in influencing oral health care provision. J OA Dent 2013;1:2.
   Google Scholar
• Voinea-Griffin A, Rindal DB, Fellows JL, Barasch A, Gilbert GH, Safford MM, et al. Pay-for-performance in dentistry: what we know. J Health Qual 2010;32:51–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tandförluster. En systematisk litteraturöversikt. (In Swedish). Summary and Conclusions in English: Prosthetic rehabilitation of partially dentate or edentulous patients. A systematic review. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2010:Report 204. Summary and conclusions available from: http://www.sbu.se/upload/Publikationer/Content1/1/Prosthetic_Rehabilitation.pdf. accessed 2013-12-04.
   Google Scholar
• Narby B, Kronstrom M, Soderfeldt B, Palmqvist S. Changes in attitudes toward desire for implant treatment: a longitudinal study of a middle-aged and older Swedish population. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:481–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohlin M, Nilner K, Davidson T, Gynther G, Hultin M, Jemt T, et al. Treatment of adult patients with edentulous arches: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:553–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hultin M, Davidson T, Gynther G, Helgesson G, Jemt T, Lekholm U, et al. Oral rehabilitation of tooth loss: a systematic review of quantitative studies of OHRQoL. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:543–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, Davidson T, Gynther G, Jemt T, Lekholm U, Nilner K, et al. Treatment of adult patients with partial edentulism: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:568–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sampogna F, Johansson V, Axtelius B, Abeni D, Soderfeldt B. Quality of life in patients with dental conditions: comparing patients’ and providers’ evaluation. Community Dent Health 2009;26:234–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar