How do dentists use CBCT in dental clinics? A Norwegian nationwide survey

References

• European Commission. Radiation protection NO. 172 SedentexCT. Guidelines on CBCT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Luxembourg: EU publication office; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:534–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu DG, Zhang WL, Zhang ZY, Wu YT, Ma XC. Three-dimensional evaluations of supernumerary teeth using cone-beam computed tomography for 487 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:403–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suomalainen AK, Salo A, Robinson S, Peltola JS. The 3DX multi image micro-CT device in clinical dental practice. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:80–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakabe J, Kuroki Y, Fujimaki S, Nakajima I, Honda K. Reproducibility and accuracy of measuring unerupted teeth using limited cone beam X-ray CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:2–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wriedt S, Jaklin J, Al-Nawas B, Wehrbein H. Impacted upper canines: examination and treatment proposal based on 3D versus 2D diagnosis. J Orofac Orthop 2012;73:28–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:93–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mota de Almeda FJ, Knutsson K, Flygare L. The effect of cone beam CT (CBCT) on therapeutic decision-making in endodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014;43:20130137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero ME, Noriega J, Castro C, Jacobs R. Does cone-beam CT alter treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative implant planning using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images. Imaging Sci Dent 2014;44:121–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nemtoi A, Czink C, Haba D, Gahleitner A. Conebeam CT: a current overview of devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20120443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:106–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanhausden S, Suetens P, et al. Comparison between effective dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for maxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2009;71:461–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. The SEDENTEXCT consortium. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:267–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, et al. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part 1. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 2010;75:265–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wenzel A, Møystad A. Decision criteria and characteristics of Norwegian general dental practitioners selecting digital radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:197–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel A, Møystad A. Experiences of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:203–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout WER, Sanderink GCH, Van der Stelt PF. Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:124–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellén-Halme K, Rohlin M, Petersson A. Dental digital radiography. A survey of quality aspects. Swed Dent J 2005;29:81–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodges RJ, Atchison KA, White SC. Impact of cone-beam computed tomography on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:665–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzen LH, Christensen J, Hintze H, Schou S, Wenzel A. Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:98870341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelley AM, Glenny A-M, Goodwin M, Brunton P, Horner K. Conventional radiography and cross-sectional imaging when planning dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible to support an overdenture: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014;43:20130321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alqerban A, Hedesiu M, Baciut M, Nackaerts O, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, et al. Pre-surgical treatment planning of maxillary canine impactions using panoramic vs cone beam CT imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20130157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdanic W, McGinty JC. Radiation worries for children in dentists’ chairs. In: The New York Times: New York; 2010. Available online at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/23/us/23scan.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. accessed 14 July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:265–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spin-Neto R, Mudrak J, Matzen LH, Christensen J, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Cone beam CT image artefacts related to head motion simulated by a robot skull: visual characteristics and impact on image quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:32310645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson K, O’Connor S, Heath N. Dental cone beam CT image quality possibly reduced by patient movement. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:91866873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel A. Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christell H, Birch S, Horner K, Rohlin M, Lindh C; SEDENTEXCT consortium. A framework for costing diagnostic methods in oral health care: an application comparing a new imaging technology with the conventional approach for maxillary canines with eruption disturbances. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012;40:351–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petersen LB, Olsen KR, Christensen J, Wenzel A. Image and surgery-related costs comparing cone beam CT and panoramic imaging before removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014;43:20140001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christell H, Birch S, Hedesiu M, Horner K, Ivanauskaité D, Nackaerts O, et al. Variation in costs of cone beam CT examinations among healthcare systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;41:571–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown J, Jacobs R, Jäghagen EL, Lindh C, Baksi G, Schulze D, et al. Basic training requirements for the use of dental CBCT by dentists: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20130291.
   Google Scholar