Temporal and masseter muscle activity in children and adults with normal occlusion An electromyographic investigation

References

• Ahlgren J. Mechanism of mastication. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1966; 24, Suppl. 44
   Google Scholar
• Ahlgren J. An intracutaneous needle electrode for kinesiologic EMG studies. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1967; 25: 15–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlgren J., Omnell K-Å., Sonesson B., Toremalm N. G. Bruxism and hypertrophy of the masseter muscle. Pract. oto-rhino-laryng. 1969; 31: 22–29
   Google Scholar
• Ahlgren J., Ingervall B., Thilander B. Muscle activity in normal and postnormal occlusion. Am. J. Orthodont. 1973; 64: 445–456
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahlgren J. Early and late electromyographic response to treatment with activators. Am. J. Orthodont. 1978; 74: 88–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grosfeld O. Changes of muscle activity patterns as a result of orthodontic treatment. Europ. Orthod. Soc. Transact. 1965; 203–214
   Google Scholar
• Herring S. W. Mastication and maturity: A longitudinal study in pigs. J. Dent. Res. 1977; 56: 1377–1382
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ingervall B., Thilander B. Relation between facial morphology and activity of the masticatory muscles. J. Oral Rehab. 1974; 1: 131–147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara J. A. An electromyographic study of mastication in the Rhesus monkey (Macaca Mulatta). Arch. Oral Biol. 1974; 19: 821–823
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitolo M. Studio elettromiografico nel corso dell'allenamento all'esercizio fisico. Boll. Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 1956; 32: 1413–1415
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitolo M. Studio elettromiografico nel corso deirallenamento all'esercizio fisico. Lav. Umano. 1957; 9: 2–23
   Google Scholar
• Moritani I., de Vries H. A. Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. Am. J. Phys. Med. 1979; 58: 115–130
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moss J. P. An electromyographic investigation and survey of Class III cases. Tr. Br. Soc. Study Orthod. 1965; 147–156
   Google Scholar
• Moss J. P. Function-Facts or fiction? Am. J. Orthodont. 1975; 67: 625–646
   Google Scholar
• Moss J. P. An investigation of the muscle activity of patients with Class H, Division 2 malocclusion and the changes during treatment. Europ. Orthod. Soc. Transact. 1975; 87–109
   Google Scholar
• Moss J. P., Chalmers C. P An electromyographic investigation of patients with normal jaw relationships and Class III jaw relationships. Am. J. Orthodont. 1974; 66: 538–556
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moyers R. E. Temporomandibular muscle contraction patterns in Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusions: An electromyographic analysis. Am. J. Orthodont. 1949; 35: 837–857
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Möller E. The chewing apparatus: An electromyographic study of the action of the muscles of mastication and its correlation to facial morphology. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1966; 69, Suppl. 280
   Google Scholar
• Pancherz H., Anehus M. Masticatory function after activator treatment. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1978; 36: 309–316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pancherz H. Activity of the temporal and masseter muscles in Class II, Division 1 malocclusions An electromyographic investigation. Am. J. Orthodont. 1980; 77: 679–688
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pancherz H., Aanehus-Pancherz M. Muscle activity in Class II, Division 1 malocclusions treated by bite jumping with the Herbst appliance. An electromyographic study. Am. J. Orthodont. 1980, to be published
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfalck P. Intra- and extracellular potential fields of active nerve and muscle fibres. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1969, suppl. 321
   Google Scholar
• Rowe R. W. D., Goldspink G. Muscle fibre growth in five different muscles in both sexes of mice. J. Anat. 1969; 104: 519–530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sacco G., Buchthal F., Rosenfalck P. Motor unit potentials at different ages. Arch. Neurol. 1962; 6: 366–373
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott J. H. The growth and function of the muscles of mastication in relation to the development of the facial skeleton and of the dentition. Am. J. Orthodont. 1954; 40: 429–449
   Google Scholar