The quality of routine class II cavity preparations for amalgam

References

• Healey H J, Phillips R W. A clinical study of amalgam failures. J Dent Res 1949; 28: 439–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elderton R J. The quality of amalgam restorations. Assessment of the quality of dental care, H Allred. London Hospital Medical College, London 1977; 45–81
   Google Scholar
• Elderton R J. Assessment of the quality of restorations. A literature review. J Oral Rehabil 1977; 4: 217–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazzi R, Pagnocca H, Issao M. Clinical evaluation of silver amalgam restorations in Sao Paulo City school children. Rev Fac Odontol S Paulo 1977; 15: 235–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anaise J Z. Prevalence of dental caries and quality of dental restorations among new immigrants to Israel. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol 1978; 6: 86–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rytomaa I, Murtomaa H, Turtola L, Lind K. Ciinicat assessment of amalgam fillings. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol 1984; 12: 169–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekhus P J, Armstrong W D. Civilization—a disease. J Am Dent Assoc 1936; 23: 1459
   Google Scholar
• Experimental dental care project, H Allred. London Hospital Medical College, London 1973, Reports 1–2
   Google Scholar
• Grasso J E, Nalbandian J, Sanford C, Bailit H. The quality of restorative dental care. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 42: 571–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschenes G H. Causes de faillite des obturations en amalgame. Can Dent Assoc J 1962; 28: 667–70
   Google Scholar
• Attalia M N, Gibb G H. Failures in class II amalgam restorations. J Dent Child 1970; 34: 11–4
   Google Scholar
• Going R E, Jendresen M D. Failures related to materials used in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1972; 16: 71–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyd M A, Richardson A S. Frequency of amalgam replacement in general dental practice. Can Dent Assoc J 1985; 10: 763–6
   Google Scholar
• Fraser C J. A study of the efficacy of dental fillings. J Dent Res 1929; 9: 507–17
   Google Scholar
• Roper L H. Restorations with amalgam in the army. An evaluation and analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 1947; 34: 443–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan D N. The durability of conservative restorations. Br Dent J 1969; 126: 172–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binus W, Wehner E. Misserfolgsquote bei amalgam und gussfiillungen. Dtsch Stomatol 1971; 21: 302–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gabrielti F, Rolfseon R L, Dinelli W, Fontana U F. Clinical study of failures of amalgam restorations. Rev Fac Farm Odontol Araraquara 1972; 4: 165–71
   Google Scholar
• Gray J C. An evaluation of the average lifespan of amalgam restorations [Thesis]. University of London, London 1976
   Google Scholar
• Hunter B. Patterns of diagnosis and treatment of dental canes from dental practice records. J Roy Soc Med 1985; 78: 11–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elderton R J, Campbell M L, Nuttall N M. Assessing the performance of dentists. Proceeding of a workshop. Sept, 9–101980. University of Dundee, Dundee
   Google Scholar
• Nadal R, Phillips R W, Swartz M L. Clinical investigation on the relation of mercury to the amalgam restoration. II. J Am Dent Assoc 1961; 63: 488–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör I A, Espevik S. Assessment of variables in clinical studies of amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 1980; 39: 1511–5
   Google Scholar
• Osborne J W, Gale E N. Failure at the margin of amalgams as affected by cavity width, tooth position, and alloy selection. J Dent Res 1981; 60: 681–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokstad A, Mjör I A. Cavity designs for class II amalgam restorations. A literature review and a suggested system for evaluation. Acta Odontol Scand 1987; 45: 257–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronstad L, Leidal T I. Scanning electron microscopy of cavity margins finished with chisels or rotating instruments at low speed. J Dent Res 1974; 53(5)1167–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumershine-Doherty R, Ezzell I, Sparks M C. A bibliography of scanning electron microscopy in dentistry. Scan Electron Microsc 1981; 207–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lussi A, Gygax M, Hotz P. Die mini-praparation approximaler kavitten. SSO 1987; 186–90
   Google Scholar
• Mahler D B, Terkla L G. Relationship of cavity design to restorative materials. Dent Clin North Am 1965; 9: 149–57
   Google Scholar
• Winkler K. Untersuchungen der harte getragener amalgamfiillungen und darstellung von veraibeitungfehlern. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1971; 26: 650–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris C F, Heuer G A. Comparison of amalgam margin angles in conventional and modified cavity preparations. J Dent Res 1980; 59A: 380
   Google Scholar
• Paffenbarger G C. Dental amalgam. Encyclopedia of chemical technology 3rd ed., Kirk-Othmer. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York 1984; 461–521
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien W J, Mahler D B, Greener E. Dental amalgam. Restorative dental materials—an overview, Vol. 1, J A Reese, T M Valega. Quintessence, London 1985
   Google Scholar
• Mjör I A. Frequency of secondary caries at various anatomical locations. Oper Dent 1985; 10: 88–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerboom H B, Borgmeyer P J, Advokaat J G, Van Reenen G J. The influence of the preparation on the marginal breakdown of amalgam restorations. Results after 3 years. J Dent Res 1981; 60A: 520
   Google Scholar
• Elderton R J. An in vivo morphological study of cavity and amalgam margins on the occlusal surfaces of human teeth [Thesis]. University of London, London 1975
   Google Scholar
• Swartz M L, Phillips R W. Evaluation of cavosurface design and microleakage. Gen Dent 1984; 32: 56–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linke S. Untersuchungen von kavittsrandern, die mit schleifkorpern in verschiedenen drehzahl-bereichen bearbeitet wurden. Normal-, hoch und hochsttouriges bohren und schleifen von zahnartsubstanzen, K Eichner. Hanser Verlag, Munich 1966; 58–64
   Google Scholar
• Tronstad L, Leidal T I. A new instrument for finishing of embrasure margins of class II cavities. J Am Dent Assoc 1976; 93: 947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyde A, Knight P J. Scanning electron microscope studies of class II cavity margins. Matrix band application. Br Dent J 1972; 133: 331–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waerhaug J. Effect of rough surfaces upon gingival tissue. J Dent Res 1956; 35: 323–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• App G R. Effect of silicate, amalgam and cast gold on the gingiva. J Prosthet Dent 1961; 11: 522–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carranza F A, Romanelli J H. The effects of fillings and prosthetic appliances on the marginal gingiva. Int Dent J 1973; 23: 64–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang N P, Kiel R A, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10: 563–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motsch A. Rationalisierung in der konservierenden zahnheilkunde. DDZ 1969; 23: 347–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dresser H P. Die drehzalabhänige präparation. Ein beitrag zur rationalisierung der praparationsarbeit. Dtsch Stomatol 1972; 22: 868–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pantke H. Die Wirkung versciedeener Instrumente auf die Kavitatenwande. SSO 1956; 66: 678–82
   Google Scholar
• Charbeneau G T, Peyton F A, Anthony D H. Profile characteristics of cut tooth surfaces developed by rotating instruments. J Dent Res 1957; 36: 957–66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ball J S, Davidson C W. Estimation of air turbine rotational speed under clinical conditions. Br Dent J 1962; 112: 208
   Google Scholar
• Sturdevant C M, Barton R E, Sockwell C L, Strickland W D. The art and science of operative dentistry. 2nd ed. The C. V. Mosby Co., St Louis 1985
   Google Scholar
• Nitlich J, Zeilig G. Abregt de dentisterie conservatrice. I. Les tissus durs. Masson, Paris 1979
   Google Scholar
• Baum L. Restorative techniques for individual teeth. Masson, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Penning C, Steures R W, Heller E J, Ree M H, Van Velzen S K, Wesselink P R. Prepareren en restaureren met plastische materialen. Een evaluatie vanmethoden en technieken. Bohn Scheltema & Holken BV, Utrecht 1984
   Google Scholar
• Sturdevant C M. The art and science of operative dentistry. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York 1968
   Google Scholar
• Hals E. Karies kliniske og røntgenologiske billede. Nordisk lärobok i kariologi. 3rd ed., Y Ericsson. Sveriges Tandlforb. Förlagsforening, Stockholm 1973; 155–68
   Google Scholar
• Bodecker C F. Eradication of enamel fissures. Dent Items Int 1929; 51: 859
   Google Scholar
• Black G V. A work on operative dentistry. Technical procedures in filling teeth. Vols. I and II. Medico-Dental Publ. Co., Woodstock 1908
   Google Scholar
• Mahler D B, Terkla L G, Johnson L N. Evaluation of techniques for analysing cavity design for amalgam restoration. J Dent Res 1961; 40: 497–503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro M E. Photoelasticity employed in a comparative study of four types of cavity preparation for primary molars [Thesis]. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 1952
   Google Scholar
• Granath L E, Koch G. Biomekanisk behandling av håda tandvävnader. Nordisk Klinisk Odontologi. Vol. 9—XVI-I. A/S Forl. Faglitteratur, Copenhagen 1967
   Google Scholar
• Terkla L G, Mahler D B. Clinical evaluation of interproximal retention grooves in class II amalgam cavity design. J Prosthet Dent 1967; 17: 596–602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galan J, Jr, Gilmore H W, Lund M R. Retention for the proximal portion of the class II amalgam restoration. J Indiana Dent Assoc 1975; 54: 16–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mondelli J, Ishikiriama A, Navarro M F, Galan J, Jr, Coadazzi J L. Fracture strength of amalgam restorations in modern class II preparations with proximal retentive grooves. J Prosthet Dent 1974; 32: 564–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockett W D, Shepard F E, Moon P C, Creal A F. The influence of proximal retention grooves on the retention and resistance of class II preparations for amalgams. J Am Dent Assoc 1975; 91: 1053–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouschor C F, Martin J R. A review of concepts of silver amalgam retention. J Prosthet Dent 1976; 36: 532–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen Dreyer K. Dentale amalgamer. Odontologisk boghandelsforlag, Aarhus 1967
   Google Scholar
• Eames W B, MacNamara J F. Eight high-copper alloys and six conventional alloys compared. Oper Dent 1976; 1(3)98–107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott D B, Wyckhoff R W. Shadowed replicas of tooth surfaces. US Public Health Rep 1946; 61: 697–700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton P, Linden G J. The assessment of restorations by dental students and their teachers. J Dent 1987; 15: 26–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elderton R J. An objective method for measuring the surface morphology of cavities and restorations in vivo. J Oral Rehabil 1977; 4: 323–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyde A, Knight P J. SEM studies of the preparation of the embrasure walls of class II cavities. Br Dent J 1970; 129: 557–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gale E N, Osborne J W. Clinical performance of amalgam as predicted by physical property tests. J Dent Res 1980; 59: 61–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp N W. Dental amalgam, a plea for clinical research. J Am Acad Gold Foil Oper 1975; 18: 29–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson C J, Ryge G. Clinical study of dental amalgam. J Am Dent Assoc 1963; 66: 763–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar