Proximo-occlusal composite restorations in primary molars: Marginal adaptation, bacterial penetration, and pulpal reactions

References

• Jörgensen KD, Hisamitsu H. Class 2 composite restorations: prevention in vitro of contraction gaps. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 141–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ehrnford L, Derand T. Cervical gap formation in Class II composite resin restorations. Swed Dent J 1984; 8: 15–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qvisl V, Ovist J. Marginal leakage around Concise® in relation to filling procedure. Scand J Dent Res 1977; 85: 305–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ. Bacterial penetration pulpal reaction and the inner surface of Concise Enamel Bond. Composite fillings in etched and in etched cavities. J Dent Res 1978; 57: 3–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejàre B, Mejàre I, Edwardsson S. Bacteria beneath composite restorations—a culturing and histobacteriological study. Acta Odontol Scand 1979; 37: 267–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejàre B, Mejàre I, Edwardsson S. Acid etching and composite resin restorations. A culturing and histologie sludy on bacterial penetration. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3: 1–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qvist V. Correlation between marginal adaptation of composite resin restorations and bacterial growth in cavities. Scand J Dent Res 1980; 88: 296–300
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qvist V. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations performed in vivo with different acid-etch restorative procedures. Scand J Dent Res 1985; 93: 68–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leidal T I, Eriksen HM. Human pulpal response to composite resin restorations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1: 66–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergenholz G. Effect of bacterial products on inflammatory reaction in the dental pulp. Scand J Dent Res 1977; 85: 122–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warlvinge J, Dahlén G, Bergenholtz G. Dental pulp response to bacterial cell wall materials. J Dent Res 1985; 64: 1046–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergenholtz G, Cox C F, Loesche WJ. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the denial pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 439–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hörsted-Bindslev P. Monkey pulp reactions to cavities treated with Gluma Dentin Bond and restored with a microfilled composite. Scand J Dent Res 1987; 95: 347–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oldenburg T R, Vann W F, Dilley DC. Composite restorations for primary molars: results after lour years. Pediatr Dent 1987; 9: 136–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varpio M. Proximoclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a six-year follow-up. J Dent Child 1985; 52: 435–40
   Google Scholar
• Gröndahl HG, Hollender L, Malmcrona E, Sundquist B. Dental caries and restorations in teenagers. I. Index and score system for radiographic studies of proximal surfaces. Swed Dent J 1977; 1: 45–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leifler E, Varpio M. Proximoclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a two-year follow up. J Dent Child 1981; 48: 411–16
   Google Scholar
• Guidelines for the assessment of clinical quality and professional performance. California Dental Association, Los Angeles, Calif.USA 1977
   Google Scholar
• Norén JG, Engström C. Das Schneiden mineralisierter harter Gewebe mit Dent Leitz-Säge-mikrotom 1600. Leitz Mitt Techn 1987; 9: 49–52
   Google Scholar
• McKay GS. Gram stain modification to improve colour contrast. J Clin Pathol 1970; 23: 191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warfvinge J, Bergenholtz G. Healing capacity of human and monkey dental pulps following experimentally induced pulpitis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986; 2: 256–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Hamadani K K, Crabb H SM. Marginal adaptation of composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1975; 2: 21–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Relief D H, Woods E, Jamison HC. Micro-leakage of selected composite restorative resins. J Dent 1982; 10: 292–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Retief D H, Woods E, Jamison HC. Effect of cavo-surface treatment on marginal leakage in Class V composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 47: 496–501
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amsberry W, Von Fraunhofer J A, Hoots J. Marginal leakage of several acid-etch composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 647–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crim G A, Swartz M L, Phillips RW. An evaluation of cavosurface design and microleakage. Gen Dent 1984; 32: 56–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross J D, Retief D H, Bradley EL. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 1985; 1: 7–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lui I L, Masutani S, Setcos J C, Lutz F, Swartz M L, Phillips RW. Margin quality and microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 114: 49–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qvist V. The effect of mastication on marginal adaptation of composite restorations in vivo. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 904–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raadal M. Microleakage around preventive composite fillings in loaded teeth. Scand J Dent Res 1979; 87: 390–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hicks JM. Caries-like lesion formation around occlusal alloy and preventive resin restorations. Pediatr Dent 1984; 6: 17–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donly K J, Jensen M E, Reinhardt Walker J. JD. Posterior composite polymerization shrinkage in primary teeth: an in vivo comparison of three restorative techniques. Pediatr Dent 1987; 9: 22–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rölling I. Histomorphometric analysis of primary teeth during the process of resorption and shedding. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89: 132–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mejàre I, Mejàre B, Edwardsson S. Effect of a tight seal on survival of bacteria in saliva-contaminated cavities filled with composite resin. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3: 1–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brännström M, Nordenvall K, Torstensson B, Hedström KG. Protective effect of polysteren liners for composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 49: 331–6
   Google Scholar