The influence of dental amalgam placement on mercury, selenium, and glutathione peroxidase in man

References

• Vimy M J, Lorscheider FL. Intra-oral air mercury released from dental amalgam. J Dent Res 1985; 64: 1069–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vimy M J, Lorscheider FL. Serial measurements of intra-oral air mercury: Estimation of daily dose from dental amalgam. J Dent Res 1985; 64: 1073–85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackert JR, Jr. Factors affecting estimation of dental amalgam mercury exposure from measurements of mercury vapor levels in intra-oral and expired air. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1775–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund A, Pohl L, Ohlsson S, Bergman M. Determination of the rate of release of intra-oral mercury vapour from amalgam. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 1235–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frykholm KO. On mercury from dental amalgam. Its toxic and allergic effects and some comments on occupational hygiene [Thesis]. Acta Odontol Scand 1957; 15, suppl 22
   Google Scholar
• Olstad M L, Holland R I, Wandel N, Hensten-Pettersen A. Correlation between amalgam restorations and mercury concentrations in urine. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1179–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langworth S, Elinder C-G, Åkesson A. Mercury exposure from dental fillings. I. Mercury concentrations in blood and urine. Swed Dent J 1988; 12: 69–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molin M, Marklund S, Bergman B, Bergman M, Stenman E. Plasma-selenium glutathione peroxidase in erythrocytes and mercury in patients allegedly subject to oral galvanism. Scand J Dent Res 1987; 95: 328–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molin M, Marklund S, Bergman B, Nilsson B. Mercury, selenium, and glutathione peroxidase in dental personnel. Acta Odontol Scand 1989; 47: 383–390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molin M, Bergman B, Marklund S, Schütz A, Skerfving S. Mercury, selenium, and glutathione peroxidase before and after amalgam removal in man. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48, in press
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krøncke A, Ott K, Petschelt A, Schaller K-H, Szecsi M, Valentin H. Uber die Quecksilberkonzentrationen in Blut and Urin von Personen mit und ohne Amalgamfullungen. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1980; 35: 803–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abraham J E, Svare C W, Frank CW. The effect of dental amalgam restorations on blood mercury levels. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 71–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott K HR, Loh F, Kröncke A, Schaller K-H, Valentin H, Weltle D. Zur Quecksilberbelastung durch Amalgamfullungen. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1984; 39: 199–205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Axell T, Nilner K, Nilsson B. Clinical evaluation of patients referred with symptoms related to oral galvanism. Swed Dent J 1983; 7: 169–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson B, Stenman E, Bergman M. Clinical study of patients referred for investigation regarding so-called oral galvanism. Scand J Dent Res 1984; 92: 469–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hugoson A. Results obtained from patients referred for investigations of complaints related to oral galvanism. Swed Dent J 1986; 10: 15–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahlqwist M, Bengtsson C, Furunes B, Hollender I, Lapidus L. Number of amalgam tooth fillings in relation to subjectively experienced symptoms in a study of Swedish women. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988; 16: 227–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer J G, First HA. The toxicity of mercury in dental amalgam. Calif Dent Assoc J 1982; 10: 47–61
   Google Scholar
• Burrows D. Hypersensitivity to mercury nickel and chromium in relation to dental materials. Int Dent J 1986; 36: 30–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finne K, Göransson K, Winckler L. Oral lichen planus and contact allergy to mercury. Int J Oral Surg 1982; 11: 236–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mobacken H, Hersle K, Sloberg K, Thilander H. Oral lichen planus hypersensitivity reactions to dental restoration material. Contact Dermatitis 1984; 10: 11–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly M, Moule A J, Bryant R W, Freeman S. Amalgam-related chronic ulceration of oral mucosa. Br Dent J 1986; 160: 434–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parizek J, Ostadalova I. Protective effect of small amounts of selenite in sublimate intoxication. Experientia 1967; 23: 142–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magos L, Webb M. The interaction of selenium with cadmium and mercury. Crit Rev Toxicol 1980; 8: 1–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygaard S-P, Hansen JC. Mercury selenium interaction at concentrations of selenium and of mercury vapours as prevalent in nature. Bull Environ Contarn Toxicol 1978; 20: 20–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosta L, Byrne A R, Zelenko V. Correlation between selenium and mercury in man following exposure to inorganic mercury. Nature 1975; 254: 238–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander J, Thomassen Y, Aaseth J. Increased urinary excretion of selenium among workers exposed to elemental mercury vapor. J Appl Toxicol 1983; 3: 143–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki T, Himeno S, Hongo T, Watanabe C, Satoh H. Mercury-selenium interaction in workers exposed to elemental mercury vapor. J Appl Toxicol 1986; 6: 149–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einarsson O, Lindstedt G, Bergstrom T. A computerized automatic apparatus for determination of mercury in biological samples. J Autom Chem 1984; 6: 74–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skare I. Microdetermination of mercury in biological samples. III. Automated determination of mercury in urine, fish and blood samples. Analyst 1972; 97: 148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstedt G. A rapid method for the determination of mercury in urine. Analyst 1970; 95: 294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalonde L, Jean Y, Roberts K D, Chapdelaine A, Bleau G. Fluorometry of selenium in serum and urine. Clin Chem 1982; 28: 172–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of proteindye binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72: 248–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birke G, Johnels A, Plantin L O, Sjöstrand B, Skerfving S, Westermark T. Studies on humans exposed to methyl mercury through fish consumption. Arch Environ Health 1972; 25: 77–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skerfving S. Methylmercury exposure mercury levels in blood and hair and health status in Swedes consuming contaminated fish. Toxicology 1974; 2: 3–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl L, Berglund A, Bergman M, Olsson S. A new instrument for mercury vapor evacuation during clinical work with dental amalgam. Swed Dent J 1988; 12: 193–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen LS. Interactions of silver and copper with selenium in chicks. Fed Proc 1974; 33: 694
   Google Scholar
• Godwin K O, Partick E J, Fuss CN. Adverse effects of copper, and to a lesser extent iron, when administered to selenium-deficient rats. Trace element metabolism in man and animals, M Kirchgessner. Freising-Weihenstephan, West Germany 1977; Vol. 3: 185–7
   Google Scholar
• Black R S, Whanger P D, Tripp MJ. Influence of silver, mercury, lead, cadmium, and selenium on glutathione peroxidase and transferase activity in rats. Biol Trace Element Res 1979; 1: 313–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alexander J, Aaseth J. Biliary excretion of copper and zinc in the rat as influenced by diethylmaleate, selenite, and diethyldithiocarbamate. Biochem Pharmacol 1980; 29: 2129–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner P A, Hoekstra W G, Ganther HE. Alleviation of silver toxicity by selenite in the rat in relation to tissue glutathione peroxidase. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1975; 148: 1106–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foa V, Caimi L, Amante L. Patterns of some lysosomal enzymes in the plasma and of proteins in urine of workers exposed to inorganic mercury. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1976; 37: 115–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchet J P, Roels H, Bernard A, Lauwerys R. Assessment of renal function of workers exposed to inorganic lead cadmium or mercury vapor. J Occup Med 1980; 22: 741–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stonard M D, Chater B V, Duffield D P, Nevitt A L, O'Sullivan J J, Steel GT. An evaluation of renal function in workers occupationally exposed to mercury vapour. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1983; 52: 177–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roels H, Abdeladim S., Ceulemans E, Lauwerys R. Relationships between the concentrations of mercury in air and in blood or urine in workers exposed to mercury vapour. Ann Occup Hyg 1987; 31: 135–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar