Third molars in Norwegian general dental practice

References

• Berge T I. Oral surgery in Norwegian general dental practice—a survey. Extent, scope, referrals, emergencies, and medically compromised patients. Acta Odontol Scand 1992; 50: 7–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Health. Consensus development conference summaries: removal of third molars 1980; 2(no. 11)1–4
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson S, Heimdahl A, Nordenram A. Pathological changes related to long term impaction of third molars. A radiographic study. Int J Oral Max-illofac Surg 1989; 18: 210–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley H R, Alattar M, Collett W K, Stringfellow HR, Jr, Spiegel E H. Pathological sequelae of ‘neglected’ impacted third molars. J Oral Pathol 1988; 17: 113–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sewerin I, Von Wowern N. A radiographic four year follow-up study of asymptomatic mandibular third molars in young adults. Int Dent J 1990; 40: 24–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahlqwist M, Grondahl H-G. Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathology in middle-aged and older Swedish women. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991; 19: 116–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Wowern N, Nielsen H O. The fate of impacted lower third molars after the age of 20. A four-year clinical follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 18: 277–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlstrom U, Kugelberg C F. Den retinerade vis-domstanden i underkaken. Indikationer for och komplikationer till avlagsnande. Odontologi 89. Munksgaard, Copenhagen 1989; 187–98
   Google Scholar
• Stephens R G, Kogon S L, Reid J A. The unerupted or impacted third molar—a critical appraisal of its pathologic potential. Can Dent J 1989; 55: 201–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hugoson A, Kugelberg C F. The prevalence of third molars in a Swedish population. An epidemiological study. Community Dent Health 1988; 5: 121–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews F M, Morgan J N, Sonquist J A, Klem L. Multiple classification analysis. A report on a computer program for multiple regression using categorical predictors. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 1975
   Google Scholar
• Lysell L, Rohlin M. A study of indications used for removal of the mandibular third molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 17: 161–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordenram Å, Hultin M, Kjellman O, Ramstrom G. Indications for surgical removal of the mandibular third molar. Swed Dent J 1987; 11: 23–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nordenram Å. Postoperative complications in oral surgery. Swed Dent J 1983; 7: 109–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn T P, Frederickson G, Jr, Small I A, Torgerson T S. A prospective study of complications related to mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985; 43: 767–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kugelberg C F, Ahlstrom U, Ericson S, Hugoson A. Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery. A retrospective study. Int J Oral surg 1985; 14: 29–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guralnick W. Third molar surgery. Br Dent J 1984; 156: 389–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash M M, Costich E R, Hayward J R. A study of periodontal hazards of third molars. J Periodontol 1962; 33: 209–19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytle J J. Indications and contraindications for removal of the impacted tooth. Dent Clin North Am 1979; 23: 333–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yablon P, Wolf M C, Maykow K P. Third molar teeth: Differing concepts of oral surgeons and other dentists. NY State Dent J 1988; 54: 27–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jokinen M A. Prevention of postextraction bac-teriemia by local prophylaxis. Int J Oral Surg 1978; 7: 450–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacGregor A J, Hart P. The topical antiseptic effect of chlorhexidine on the bacteria of third molar wounds and their complications. J Oral Surg 1971; 29: 481–5
   Google Scholar
• Krekmanov I, Nordenram Å. Postoperative complications after surgical removal of mandibular third molars. Effects of penicillin V and chlorhexidine. Int J Oral Surg 1986; 15: 259
   Google Scholar
• Hellem S, Nordenram A. Prevention of postoperative symptoms by general antibiotic treatment and local bandage in removal of mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Surg 1973; 2: 273–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holland C S, Hindle M O. The influence of closure or dressing of third molar sockets on postoperative swelling and pain. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 22: 65–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Brabander E C, Cattaneo G. The effect of surgical drain together with a secondary closure technique on postoperative trismus swelling and pain after mandibular third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 17: 119–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaziro G SN. Metronidazole (Flagyl) and arnica montana in the prevention of postsurgical complications a comparative placebo controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 22: 42–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedström L. Metronidazols effekt på utveckling av dry sockets vid operativt avlägsnande av semiretinerade underkäksvisdomständer. Tandlakartidningen 1990; 82: 1–2; 4–8
   Google Scholar
• Rood J P, Murgatroyd J. Metronidazole in the prevention of dry socket. Br J Oral Surg 1979; 17: 62–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hepponen R P, Bäckström, Ylipaavalniemi P. Prophylactic use of phenoxymethyl-penicillin and tinidazole in mandibular third molar surgery a comparative placebo controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 28: 12–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran J B, Kennett S, Young A. An assessment of the use of prophylactic antibiotics in third molar surgery. Int J Oral Surg 1974; 3: 1–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seymour R A, Meechan J G, Blair G S. An investigation into postoperative pain after third molar surgery under local analgesia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985; 23: 410–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzan D W, Tal O, Sela M N, Shteyer A. Pericoronitis: a reappraisal of its clinical and microbiologic aspects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985; 43: 510–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics on health personnel 1985. Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway, Oslo 1986
   Google Scholar