11-Year assessment of class-Ill resin restorations completed with two restorative procedures

References

• Ovist V, Thylstnip A, Mjör IA. Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of resin restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1986; 44: 351–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allander L, Birkhed D, Bratthall D. Quality evaluation of anterior restorations in private practice. Swed Dent J 1989; 13: 141–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 305–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of resin-based composite restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 82–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvist V. Resin restorations: leakage-bacteria-pulp. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993; 9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryant RW, Rees FT, Ross ID. Clinical evaluation of a restorative resin with inorganic filler. Preliminary report and discussion. Aust Dent J 1979; 24: 402–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bozell RR, Charbeneau GT. Clinical evaluation of unetched, etched and etched-bonded class 3 and 5 composite restorations [abstract]. J Dent Res 1979; 58: 333
   Google Scholar
• Hammer B, Hotz P. Nachkontrolle von 1-bis 5jah-rigen Amalgam-, Komposit- und Goldgussfullun-gen. SSO 1979; 89: 301–14
   Google Scholar
• Oram V, Lyders B. Marginal defects of etched and unetched composite resin restorations. A 2 years clinical investigation [abstract]. J Dent Res 1981; 60: 1246
   Google Scholar
• Smales RJ. Effects of enamel-bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of an anterior composite resin. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 130–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bayne SC, Shugars DA, Heymann HO, Wilder AD, Taylor DF. 10-year clinical analysis of etched vs non-etched anterior composites [abstract]. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 559
   Google Scholar
• Qvist V. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations performed in vivo with different acid-etch restorative procedures. Scand J Dent Res 1985; 93: 68–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qvist V, Ström C, Thylstrup A. Two-year assessment of anterior resin restorations inserted with two acid-etch restorative procedures. Scand J Dent Res 1985; 93: 343–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ström C, Qvist V. Four-year assessment of anterior resin restorations performed with two restorative procedures [abstract]. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 828
   Google Scholar
• Qvist V, Strøm C. Six-year assessment of anterior resin restorations performed with two restorative procedures [abstract]. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 139
   Google Scholar
• Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw Hill, New York 1956
   Google Scholar
• Armitage P. Statistical methods in medical research. 4th ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford 1971
   Google Scholar
• Qvist V, Johannessen L, Lambjerg-Hansen H. En klinisk sammenligning af fyldninger i silikatcement og komposit plast efter 4–5 års funktionstid. Tand-laegebladet 1980; 84: 529–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qvist V, Johannessen L, Lambjerg-Hansen H, Thylstrup A. Replacement of class III and V composite resin and silicate cement restorations [abstract]. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 576
   Google Scholar
• Ameye C, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Conventional and microfilied composite resins. I. Color stability and marginal adaptation. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 46: 623–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Buth K, Janik G., Janik G, Klinke G. Klinische Untersuchungen zur Beurteilung des Komposit-fullungsmaterials Evicrol nach einer Funktions-periode von zwei bis drei Jahren. Stomatol DDR 1982; 32: 115–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christensen RP, Christensen GJ. In vivo comparison of a microfilied and a composite resin: a three-year report. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 657–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loyes K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G., Davidson GL. Material development and clinical performance of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 664–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlapbach T, Hotz P, Roulet JF. Ein klinischer Vergleich konventionell und mikrogefullter Kom-posits für Klasse-III-Fullungen–Resultate nach zwei Jahren. SSO 1982; 92: 667–80
   Google Scholar
• Gängler P, Hoyer J, Krehan F, Niemella S, Weinert W. Biologic testing and clinical trial of a visible light-curing composite resin restorative material. Quintessence Int 1990; 21: 833–42
   Google Scholar
• Bentley C, Drake CW. Longevity of restorations in a dental school clinic. J Dent Educ 1986; 50: 594–600
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dijken JWV. van. A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, microfiller and hybrid composite resin fillings. A 6-year follow-up study. Acta Odontol Scand 1986; 44: 357–67
   Google Scholar
• Noort R. van. Controversial aspects of composite resin restorative materials. Br Dent J 1983; 155: 380–5
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF, Mazer RB, Russell CM. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on wear rate of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 121: 251–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leinfelder KF. Criteria for clinical evaluation of composite resin restorations. Anusavice KJ, editor. Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Criteria for placement and replacement. Quintessence Publishing Co, Chicago 1989; 139–46
   Google Scholar
• Asmussen E, Hansen EK. Surface discoloration of restorative resins in relation to surface softening and oral hygiene. Scand J Dent Res 1986; 94: 174–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar