24
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

One-stage closure of isolated cleft palate with the Veau-Wardill-Kilner V to Y pushback procedure or the Cronin modification: III. Comparison of lateral craniofacial morphology

&
Pages 313-321 | Received 19 Nov 1992, Published online: 02 Jul 2009

References

  • Bishara SE, de Arrendo RSM, Vales HP, Jakobsen JR. Dentofacial relationships in persons with unop-erated clefts: comparisons between three cleft types. Am J Orhod 1985; 87: 481–507
  • Bishara SE, Iversen WW. Cephalometric comparisons on the cranial base and base in individuals with isolated clefts of the palate. Cleft Palate J 1974; 11: 162–75
  • Dahl E. Craniofacial morphology in congenital clefts of the lip and palate. Acta Odontol Scand 1970
  • Ross RB, Johnston MC. Cleft lip and palate. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 1972
  • Dahl E, Kreiborg S, Jensen BL, Fogh-Andersen P. Comparison of craniofacial morphology in infants with incomplete cleft lip and infants with isolated cleft palate. Cleft Palate J 1982; 19: 258–66
  • Smahel Z, Brousilová M, Müllerova Z. Craniofacial morphology in isolated cleft palate prior to palatoplasty. Cleft Palate J 1987; 24: 200–8
  • Brauer RO. Push-back repair of the cleft palate with nasal mucosal flaps to prevent late contracture; follow-up results of the Cronin procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 36: 529–37
  • Cronin TD. Method of preventing raw area of the nasal surface of soft palate in push-back surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1957; 20: 474–81
  • Heliövaara A, Rintala A, Ranta R. One-stage closure of isolated cleft palate with the Veau-Wardill-Kilner V to Y pushback procedure or the Cronin modification. I. Comparison of operative results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 1993; 27: 49–54
  • Heliövaara A, Pere A, Ranta R. One-stage closure of isolated cleft palate with the Veau-Wardill-Kilner V to Y pushback procedure or the Cronin modification. II. Height, weight and comparison of dental arches. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg, 12
  • Jennrich R, Sampson P. Stepwise discriminant analysis. Vol I. University of California Press, Berkeley fCA 1988; 337–56
  • Jackson D, Douglas J. Linear regression by groups. Vol II. University of California Press, Berkeley [CA] 1988; 843–56
  • Jakobsson ÓP. Repair of isolated cleft palate. A comparison of one- and two-stage surgery by dental arch measurements, cephalometry, and speech analysis. Acta Univ Upsal 1990; 236
  • Warren DW, Duany LF, Fischer ND. Nasal airway resistance in normal and cleft palate subjects. Cleft Palate J 1969; 6: 134–40
  • Semb G, Shaw WC. Pharyngeal flap and facial growth. Cleft Palate J 1990; 27: 217–24
  • Jain RB, Krogman WM. Cleft type and sex differences in craniofacial growth in clefting from one month to ten years. Cleft Palate J 1983; 20: 238–45
  • Long RE, Jain RB, Krogman WM. Possible sex-discriminant variables in craniofacial growth in clefting. Am J Orthod 1982; 82: 392–402
  • Jonsson G, Thilander B. Occlusion, arch dimensions, and craniofacial morphology after palatal surgery in a group of children with clefts in the secondary palate. Am J Orthod 1979; 76: 243–55
  • Smahel Z. Variations in craniofacial morphology with severity of isolated cleft palate. Cleft Palate J 1984; 21: 140–58
  • Viteporn S, Enemark H, Melsen B. Postnatal craniofacial development following a pushback operation of patients with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991; 28: 392–7
  • Bishara SE. Comparisons of the effect of two palatoplasties on facial and dental relations. Cleft Palate J 1974; 11: 261–71
  • Bishara SE, Enemark H, Tharp R. Cephalometric comparisons of the results of Wardill-Kilner and von Langenbeck palatoplasties. Cleft Palate J 1976; 13: 319–29
  • Normando ADC, Silva Filho OGda, Capelozza Filho L. Influence of surgery on maxillary growth in cleft lip and/or palate patients. J Cranio-Max-Fac Surg 1992; 20: 111–8
  • Palmer CR, Hamlen M, Ross RB, Lindsay WK. Cleft palate repair: Comparison of the results of two surgical techniques. Can J Surg 1969; 12: 32–9
  • Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting growth in cleft lip and palate. VI. Techniques of palate repair. Cleft Palate J 1987; 24: 64–70

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.