Clinical and radiologic assessment of possibilities for endosseous implants and osseointegrated prostheses in 55-year-old edentulous subjects

References

• Tervonen T, Bergenholtz A, Nordling H, Ainamo A, Ainamo J. Edentulousness and the use of removable dentures among people 25, 35,50 and 65 years old in Ostrobothnia, Finland. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1985; 81: 264–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 27: 120–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kribbs P J, Chesnut C H, Ott S M, Kilcoyne R F. Relationship between mandibular and skeletal bone in an osteoporotic population. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 703–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman B, Carlsson G E. Clinical long-term study of complete denture wearers. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 56–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slagter A P, Olthoff L W, Bosman F, Steen W HA. Masticatory ability, denture quality, and oral conditions in edentulous subjects. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 299–307
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blomberg S, Lindquist L W. Psychological reactions to edentulousness and treatment with jawbone-anchored bridge. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 68: 251–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogenius S, Bergren U, Blomberg S, Jemt T, Öhman S-C. Demographical odontological and psychological variables in individuals referred for osseonintegrated dental implants. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992; 20: 224–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brånemark P-I, Hansson B O, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallen O. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the dentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plastic Reconstr Surg 1977; 11, Suppl 16
   Google Scholar
• Lekholm U, Zarb G A. Patient selection and preparation. Tissue integrated prosthesis, P-I Brånemark, G A Zarb, T Albrektson. Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Chicago 1985; 199–209
   Google Scholar
• Mailath G, Ulm C W, Ertl U, Matejka M. Sonographic imaging of the soft-tissue thickness of the edentulous maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 70–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ten Bruggenkate C M, Kraaijenhagen H A, Van der Kwast W AM, Krekeler G, Oostenbeek H S. Autogenous maxillary bone grafts in conjunction with placement of I.T.I endosseus implants. A preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 21: 81–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laney W R. Selecting edentulous patients for tissue-integrated prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 129–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseo-integrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 347–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johns R B, Jemt T, Heath M R, Hutton J E, McKenna S, McNamara D C. A multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 513–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salonen M AM, Oikarinen K S, Virtanen K K, Pernu H. Failures in the osseointegration of endosseus implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8: 92–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petersson A, Lindh C, Carlsson L-E. Estimation of the possibility to treat the edentulous maxilla with osseointegrated implants. Swed Dent J 1992; 16: 1–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmqvist S, Söderfelt B, Arnbjerg D. Influences of some background factors on the subjective need for dental implants in a Swedish population. Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51: 9–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal H, Moses O. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991; 20: 40–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson D J. Ridge mapping for determination of alveolar ridge width. J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989; 4: 41–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams M YA, Mealey B L, Hallmon W W. The role of computerized tomography in dental implan-tology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 373–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tammisalo E, Hallikainen D, Kanerva H, Tam-Misalo T. Comprehensive oral X-ray diagnosis: Scanora multimodal radiography. A preliminary description. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992; 21: 9–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood R M, Moore D L. Grafting of the maxillary sinus with intraorally harvested autogenous bone prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3: 209–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenquist J B, Nyström E. Occlusion of the incisal canal with bone chips. A procedure to facilitate insertion of implants in the anterior maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 21: 210–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson D, Cawood J I. Anterior maxillary osetoblasty to broaden the narrow maxillary ridge. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 20: 342–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haers P EJ, Van Straaten W, Stoelinga P JW, De Koomen H A, Blydorp P A. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed mandible prior to vestibuloplasty or placement of endosseus implants. A 2 to 5 year follow up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 20: 149–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wachtel H C, Langford A, Bernimoulin J-P, Reich-Art P. Guided bone regeneration next to osseointegrated implants in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 127–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenquist B. Fixture placement posterior to the mental foramen with transpositioning of the inferior alveolar nerve. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 7: 45–50
   Google Scholar
• Krump J L, Barnett B G. The immediate implant: a treatment alternative. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 19–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor T D. Fixed implant rehabilitation for the edentulous maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 329–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jemt T, Book K, Linden B, Urde G. Failures and complications in 92 consecutively inserted over-dentures supported by Branemark implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae: a study from prosthetic treatment to first annual check-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 162–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hobkirk J A, Schwab J. Mandibular deformation in subjects with osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 319–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meijer H JA, Kuiper J H, Starmans F JM, Bosman F. Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 96–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis S, Sharma A, Nishimura R. Treatment of edentulous maxillae with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 503–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ten Bruggengate C M, Oosterbeek H S, Krekeler G, Asikainen P J. The placement of angled implants in the edentulous maxillae for the use of overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 807–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salonen M. Assessment of states of dentures and interest in implant-retained prosthetic treatment in 55-year old edentulous subjects. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994; 15., In press
   Google Scholar
• Jaffin R A, Berman C L. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periontol 1991; 62: 2–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindet-Pedersen S. Review of the transmandibular implant. Oral Surg Oral Diagn 1991; 2: 3–6
   Google Scholar
• Atwood D A. Some clinical factors related to rate of resorption of residual ridges. J Prosthet Dent 1962; 12: 441–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist S, Haraldsson T. Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3-year follow-up study. Scand J Dent Res 1992; 100: 279–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sennerby L, Carlsson G E, Bergman B, Warfvinge J. Mandibular bone resorption in patients treated with tissue-integrated prostheses and in complete-denture wearers. Acta Odontol Scand 1988; 46: 135–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar