References
- Guedes MC, Weber R, Gomez MVSG, Brito Neto RV, Peralta CGO, Bento RF. Influence of evoked compound action potential on speech perception in cochlear implant users. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 73: 439–45
- van Dijk B, Botros AM, Battmer RD, Begall K, Dillier N, Hey M, et al. Clinical results of AutoNRTTM, a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2007; 28: 558–70
- Dees DC, Dillier N, Lai WK, von Wallenberg E, van Dijk B, Akdas F, et al. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10: 105–16
- Seidman MD, Vivek P, Dickinson W. Neural response telemetry results with the Nucleus 24 contour in a perimodiolar position. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26: 620–3
- van Weert S, Stokroos RJ, Rikers MMJG, van Dijk P. Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: a neural response telemetry study. Acta Otolaryngol 2005; 125: 725–31
- Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, Whiting BR, Chole RA, Neely GJ, et al. Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29: 920–8
- Huang TC, Reitzen SD, Marrinan MS, Waltzman SB, Roland JT. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27: 159–66
- Saunders, E, Cohen, L, Aschendorff, A, Shapiro, W, Knight, M, Stecker, M, , et al. Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance. Ear Hear 2002;23:28S–40S
- Hughes ML, Vander Werff KR, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Kelsay DM, Teagle HF, et al. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 471–86
- Adunka OF, Pillsbury HC, Kiefer J. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation. Fact or fantasy?. Acta Otolaryngol 2006; 126: 475–82
- Aschendorff, A, Kromeier, J, Klenzner, T, Laszig, R. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 2007;28(2 Suppl):75S–79S
- Berretini S, Forti F, Passetti S. Preservation of residual hearing following cochlear implantation: comparison between three surgical techniques. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 122: 246–52