Prevention of Hearing Loss from Exposure to Noise

References

• Bartl F. Critical evaluation of Audiometric follow-up tests in industry. Noise Control 1959; 5: 243
   Google Scholar
• Beranek L. L. Criteria for Noise in Buildings. Noise Control 1957; 3(No. 2)19
   Google Scholar
• Beranek L. L., Kryter K. D., Miller L. N. Reaction of people to exterior aircraft noise. Noise Control 1959; 5: 287
   Google Scholar
• Beranek L. L., Marshall J. L., Gudworth A. L. Calculation and the measurement of the loudness of sounds. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1951; 23: 261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boynton W. D. Noise and Noise reduction. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Occup. Med. 1952; 5: 129
   Google Scholar
• Brandt O., Johansson B. Bullerbekämpning. Stockholm 1960
   Google Scholar
• Chaffe W. C. Reduction of noise in industrial pneumatic tools. Noise Control 1955; 1(No. 2)16
   Google Scholar
• Chocholle R. Le bruit, méfaits, dangers et prévention. Comp. franç. d'Audiol. Paris 1958
   Google Scholar
• Chocholle R., Berger P. Nouvelles expériences sur la détermination de la gène causée par les bruits. Acustica 1958; 8: 37
   Google Scholar
• Corso J. F. The effects of noise on human behavior. WADC Techn. Rep. 1952; 53–81
   Google Scholar
• Cox J. R. How quiet must it be to measure normal hearing. Noise Control 1955; 1(No. 1)25
   Google Scholar
• Cox J. R. The noise Cumulator. Noise Control 1959; 5: 54
   Google Scholar
• Gudworth A. L. Field and laboratory examples of industrial noise control. Noise Control 1959; 5: 39
   Google Scholar
• Davis H., et al. Temporary deafness following exposure to loud tones and noises. Acta Otolaryng. Suppl. 1950; 88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis H., et al. The principles of monitoring audiometry. Arch. Indust. Health 1958; 17: 20
   Google Scholar
• Dickson E. D. D., Ewing Z. W. G. Contributions to Aviation Otolar. Headley Brothers, London 1947; 16–36
   Google Scholar
• Eimind K., Personal communication
   Google Scholar
• Enqström J. R. Noise reduction by covers. Noise Control 1955; 1(No. 2)19
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H., Munson W. A. Relation between loudness and masking. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1937; 9
   Google Scholar
• Gierke H. E. v. Personal protection. Noise Control 1956; 2(No. 1)37
   Google Scholar
• Glorig A. Field investigations on military personnel as regards sound. Acoust. Spectr. Univ. Mich. Press 1952; 99
   Google Scholar
• Glorig A. The practical aspect of ear protection. Am. Indust. Hyg. Ass. Quart. 1956; 17(No. 1)43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glorig A. Status of research activities of the subcommittee on noise in industry. Arch. Indust. Health 1957; 16: 449
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glorig A. Current research in industrial noise. Noise Control 1959; 5: 32
   Google Scholar
• Glorig A., Quiggle R. A hearing conservation data card. Noise Control 1956; 2(No. 6)34
   Google Scholar
• Grognot P., Gibert A. P. Le bruit dans l'armée. XV Int. Congr. Milit. Med. Pharm. Belgrade 1957; 1, 31
   Google Scholar
• Guild E. Ears can be protected. Noise Control 1958; 4: 305
   Google Scholar
• Hanks T. G. Role of the Industrial Physician in the Problem of Noise in Industry. Noise Control 1955; 1(No. 5)15
   Google Scholar
• Hatton J. F. Industrial noise, application of control measures by the industrial safety engineers. Noise Control 1955; 1(No. 5)21
   Google Scholar
• Hellen E. Prescriptions législatives et règlementaires en matière de lutte contre le bruit. Bureau Int. de Travail 1959
   Google Scholar
• Hinchcliffe R. The threshold changes at 4 kc/s. produced by bands of noise. Acta otolaryng. 1957; 47: 497
   Google Scholar
• House H. P. Methods of conservation of hearing. Arch. Indust. Health 1957; 16: 445
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• House H. P., et al. Guide for Conservation of Hearing in Noise, Subcommittee on Noise in Industry. Los Angeles 1957
   Google Scholar
• Hultgren G. V. En aktuel undersökning, Socialmed. Tidsskr. Ser. 16, 17, Stockholm 1950
   Google Scholar
• Jack W. A. Control of sustained noise. Noise. Univ. Mich. Press. February, 1952; 127
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J. E., Carhart R. Temporary threshold shift as an index of noise susceptibility. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1956; 28: 611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones S. Et nytt hörselsskydd ur Glasdun. Nord. Hygien. Tidsskr. 1951; 32: 292
   Google Scholar
• Kryter K. D. The effect of plugging the ears on the intelligibility of speech in noise. Abstr. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1946; 18: 249
   Google Scholar
• Kylin B. Temporary threshold shift and auditory trauma following exposure to steady-state noise. Acta oto-laryng. Suppl. 1960; 152
   Google Scholar
• Käser R. Einführung in das Problem des akustischen Traumas in Militärdienst. Viert.-jahrschr. Schweiz. San. Off. 1950; 27(No. 4)143
   Google Scholar
• Littler T. S. Noise measurement analysis and evaluation of harmful effects. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 1958; 1: 11
   Google Scholar
• Lund-Iversen L. Hearing conditions on board torpedo boats. Acta oto-laryng. 1957; 47: 50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lüscher E., Zwislocki J. Über die Larmschwerhörigkeit und ein neues Hörschutzgerät vielseitiger Verwendungsmöglichkeiten. Indust. Org. 1948; 17: 307
   Google Scholar
• Mintz F., Tyzzer F. G. A loudness chart for octave-band data on complex sounds. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1952; 23: 80
   Google Scholar
• Moeller K. G. Gear noise reduction. Noise Control 1955; 1(No. 2)11
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson J. S. Control of interior noise. Noise Control 1955; 1(No. 1)54
   Google Scholar
• Pollack J., Picket J. M. Interaural effects upon speech intelligibility in high noise levels. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1958; 30: 293
   Google Scholar
• Quist-Hanssen S. Praktiske erfaringer med hörselsmåling i larmindustrien. ref. Soc. Med. Tidsskr. Ser. 1950; 16: 24
   Google Scholar
• Quist-Hanssen S. Hörselsskader fremkalt av larm. Soc. Arbeid, No. 1956; 6
   Google Scholar
• Quist-Hanssen S., Ek G. Hörselsvern av Glassdun, Tidsskr. D.N.L. 1953; 73: 84
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblith W. A., et al. The relation of hearing loss to noise exposure. Am. Stand. Ass., New York 1954
   Google Scholar
• Rudmose W. Hazards of noise exposure. Noise Control 1958; 4: 11
   Google Scholar
• Rüedi L., Furrer W. Das Akustische Trauma. Basel 1947
   Google Scholar
• Schneider R. Ergebnisse Ohrenärztlicher Reihenuntersuchungen in einer Flab-Rekrutenschule und einer Sch. Flab. Abt. Diss. Berne 1951
   Google Scholar
• Scholtz W. F. The industrial hygienist's part in the solution of the industrial noise problem. AMA Arch. Ind. Health. 1957; 16: 469
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw E. A. G., Thiessen G. F. An improved ear defender. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.,(a) 1954; 26: 947, (b) 28, 773, 1956; (c) 29, 1252, 1957; (d) 30, 24, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Spieth W. Annoyance threshold for judgements of bands of noise. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1956; 28: 872
   Google Scholar
• Stevens S. S. Calculation of the loudness of complex noises. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.(a) 1955; 27: 815, (b) 28, 807, 1956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield A., Glorig A., Wheeler D. E. Is there a suitable test of susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Control 1958; 4: 40
   Google Scholar
• Theilgaard E. Undersögelse av Hörselstræthed hos Normalthörende og hos Stöjarbejdere. E. Munksgaard, Copenhagen 1951
   Google Scholar
• Tonndorf J. Auditory perception in aircraft noise. USAF School Ad. Med. Randolph Field. Proj., 21–27001, Rep. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hazardous Noise Exposure. 1956, U.S.A.F. Reg. No. 160–3
   Google Scholar
• Veneklasen P. S. Methods of noise control: Personal protection. Noise Control 1955; 1(No. 5)29
   Google Scholar
• Vikdal B. Larmproblemer i jernbaneverksteder. Nordisk Jernbanetidsskr. 1953; 79: 311
   Google Scholar
• Ward W. D., Glorig A., Sklar D. L. Dependence of temporary threshold shift at 4 kc/s on Intensity and Time. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1958; 30: 944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward W. D. Temporary Threshold Shift from Octave-band Noise. Application to Damage Risk Criteria. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1959; 31: 528
   Google Scholar
• Ward W. D. Relation between recovery from temporary threshold shift and duration of exposure. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1959; 31: 600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward W. D. Temporary threshold shift produced by intermittent exposure to noise. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1959; 31: 791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber H. J. Foundry noise. Noise Control 1959; 5: 44
   Google Scholar
• Webster J. C. Ear defenders. Measurement methods and comparative results. Noise Control 1955; 1(no. 5)34
   Google Scholar
• Webster J. C., Thompson P. O., Beitscher H. R. Noise bands versus pure tones as stimuli in measuring the acoustic attenuation of ear protective devices. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1956; 28: 631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler D. E. Field investigations: Research in the industrial plant. Acoust. Spectrum, Univ. of Mich. Press. 1952; 93
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler D. E., Glorig A. The industrial hygienist and ear protection. Noise control 1956; 2(No. 1)45
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker P. J. Teamwork approach to the noise problem. Arch. Ind. Health 1957; 16: 459
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams C. R. Soviet tentative standards and regulations for noise restriction in industry. Noise Control 1959; 5: 308
   Google Scholar
• Williams L. L. Some industrial noise problems and their solution. Noise Control 1959; 5: 36
   Google Scholar
• Zwislocki J. Acoustic filters as ear defenders. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1951; 23: 36
   Google Scholar
• Zwislocki J. Ear protection: Effectiveness versus comfort. Laryngoscope 1958; 68: 486, Noise Control 4, 350, 1958.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar