10
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Comparison of Sal and Bone-Conduction Audiometry in the Prediction of Gain from Stapes Surgery

, , &
Pages 467-478 | Received 16 Mar 1965, Published online: 08 Jul 2009

References

  • Allen G W, Fernández C. The mechanism of bone conduction. Ann. Otol. 1960; 69: 5
  • Bailey H AT, Jr, Martin F N. A method for predicting post-operative SRT. Arch. Otolaryng. (Chic.) 1963; 72: 177
  • Carhart R, Jerger J. Preferred method for clinical determination of puretone thresholds. J. Speech Hearing Dis. 1959; 24: 330
  • Dirks D, Malmquist Carolyn. Changes in bone-conduction thresholds produced by masking in the non-test ear. J. Speech Hearing Res. 1964; 7: 271
  • Hart C W, Naunton K F. Frontal bone conduction tests in clinical audiometry. Laryngoscope 1961; 71: 24
  • Herer G R. A study of the effects of various forms of stapes surgery upon estimates of cochlear reserve. Northwestern University. 1964, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation
  • Hood J D. The principles and practice of bone conduction audiometry: a review of the present position. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 1957; 50: 689
  • Jerger J, Tillman T. A new method for the clinical determination of sensorineural acuity level (SAL). Arch. Otolaryng. (Chic.) 1960; 71: 948
  • Jerger J, Jerger S. Critical evaluation of SAL audiometry. J. Speech Hearing Res. 1965, (In press.)
  • Michael L A. The SAL test in the prediction of stapedectomy results. Laryngoscope 1963; 73: 1370
  • Moncur J P, Goodhill V. Audiological evaluation in stapes surgery: the perichondrium-polyethylene prosthetic assembly. J. Speech Hearing Dis. 1963; 28: 211
  • Newby H A. Audiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., New York 1958
  • Rainville M J. Nouvelle méthode d'assourdissement pour le relève des courbes de conduction osseuse. J. Franc. Otolaryng. 1955; 4: 851
  • Shea I J, Sanabria F, Smyth G DL. Teflon piston operation for otosclerosis. Arch. Otolaryng. (Chic.) 1962; 76: 516
  • Studebaker G A. Clinical masking of air- and bone-conducted stimuli. J. Speech Hearing Dis. 1964; 29: 23

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.