35
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Clinical Application of Intensity Difference Limen

, &
Pages 435-443 | Received 30 Apr 1968, Published online: 08 Jul 2009

References

  • Békésy G., von. A new audiometer. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1947; 35: 411
  • Carhaht H. Clinical determination of abnormal auditory Actaptation. Arch. Otolaryng. (Chic) 1957; 65: 32
  • Denes P., Naunton R. F. The clinical detection of auditory recruitment. J. Laryng. 1950; 64: 375
  • Fowler E. P. Marked deafened areas in normal ears. Arch. Otolaryng (Chic) 1928; 8: 151
  • Habbebt F., Young I. M. Threshold auditory Actaptation. J. And. Res. 1962; 2: 229
  • Habbebt F., Young I. M. Amplitude of Békésy tracings with different attenuation rates. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1966; 39: 914
  • Habbebt F., Young I. M. Effects of varying attenuation rate and starting intensity on Békésy threshold. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1968; 43: 752
  • Harford E. R. Clinical application and significance of the SISI test. Presented at the international symposium, “Sensorineural hearing processes and disorders”, Detroit, Michigan, 1965
  • Hirsh I. J., Palva T., Goodman A. Difference Limen and recruitment. Arch. Otolaryng. (Chic) 1954; 60: 525
  • Hood J. D. Studies in auditory fatigue and Actaptation. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1950, Suppl. 92
  • Jercer J., Shedd J., Hakfohd E. On the detection of extremely small changes in sound intensity. Arch. Otolaryng. (Chic) 1959; 69: 200
  • Lüscher E., Zwislocki J. Eine einfache Methode zur monauralcn Bestimmung des Lautstärkeausgleiches. Arch. Ohr. Nas. Kehlkopfheilk. 1948; 155: 323
  • Lüscher E., Zwislocki J. A simple method for indirect monaural determination of the recruitment phenomenon (difference limen in intensity in different types of deafness). Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1949, Suppl. 78: 156
  • Owens E. The SISI test and VIIIth nerve versus cochlear involvement. J. Speech Hear. Dis. 1965; 30: 252
  • Reger S. N. Differences in loudness response of the normal and hard-of-hearing ear at intensity levels slightly above the threshold. Ann. Otol. 1936; 5: 1029
  • Riesz R. R. Differential intensity sensitivity of the ear for pure tones. Physiol. Ren. 1928; 31: 869
  • Schubert K. Hörermüdung and Hördauer. Arch. Ohrenheill. 1944; 51: 19
  • Sherrick C. E., Jr. Effect of background noise on the auditory intensive difference limen. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1959; 31: 239
  • Swisher I P. Response to intensity change in cochlear pathology. Laryngoscope 1966; 76: 1706
  • Swisher L. P., Stephens M. M., Doehring D. G. The effects of hearing level and normal variability on sensitivity to intensity change. J. Aud. Res. 1966; 6: 249
  • Tonndorf J., Brogan F., Washburn D. Auditory difference limen of intensity in normal-hearing subjects. USAF School of Aviation Medicine. 1955, Report No. 55–31
  • Weiss B. G., Harbert F., Wilpizeski C. R. Suprathreshold intensity discrimination. Presented at the American Speech and Hearing Association Convention, Chicago, Illinois, 1967, (Nov)
  • Wood A. C. A quantitative account of the course of auditory fatigue. University of Virginia. 1930, Unpublished master's thesis
  • Yantis P. A., Decker R. L. On the short increment sensitivity index (SISI test). J. Speech Hear. Dis. 1964; 29: 231
  • Young I. M., Harbert F. Significance of the SISI test. J. Aud. Res. 1967; 7: 303

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.