References
- Belzile M., Markle D. M. A clinical comparison of monaural and binaural hearing aids worn by patients with conductive or perceptive deafness. Laryngoscope 1959; 69: 1317
- Bender R., Wiig E. Binaural hearing aids for young children. Volta Review 1960; 62: 113
- Bentzen O., Greisen O., Jordan O. Bilateral hearing-aid treatment of 300 patients. Int Audiol 1965; 4: 121
- Standard British. The normal threshold for pure tones by earphone listening. British Standards Institution, British Standards House, 2 Park St., London 1954; 1
- Carhart R. The usefulness of the binaural hearing aid. J Speech Hearing Dis 1958; 23: 42, and Trans Amer Acad Ophthal Otolaryng Jan-Febr 1958, 120
- Di Carlo L. M., Brown W. J. The effectiveness of binaural hearing for adults with hearing impairments. J Audit Res 1960; 1: 35
- Courtois J. Dizziness treated with hearing aids. Scand Audio 1972; 11: 13
- Dirks D., Carhart R. A survey of reactions from users of binaural and monaural hearing aids. J Speech Hearing Dis 1962; 27: 311
- Dixon W. J., Massey F. J., Jr. Introduction to statistical analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York Toronto London 1957
- Haskins H. L., Hardy W. G. Clinical studies in stereophonic hearing. Laryngoscope 1960; 70: 1427
- Hedgecock LeRoy D., Sheets B. V. A comparison of monaural and binaural hearing aids for listening to speech. Arch Otolaryng (Chic.) 1958; 68: 624
- Hirsh I. J. The relation between localization and intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Amer 1950; 22: 196, IBM 1968 System/360 Scientific Subroutine Package (360A-CM-03X) Version III
- Jerger J., Carhart R., Dirks D. Binaural hearing aids and speech intelligibility. J Speech Hearing Res 1961; 4: 137
- Jerger J., Dirks D. Binaural hearing aids. An enigma. J Acoust Soc Amer 1961; 33: 537
- Jordan O., Greisen O., Bentzen O. Treatment with binaural hearing aids. A follow-up investigation of 1 147 cases. Arch Otolajyng (Chic.) 1967; 85: 105
- Kodman F., Jr. Successful binaural hearing aid users. Arch Otolaryng (Chic.) 1961; 74: 84
- Markle D. M., Aber W. A clinical evaluation of monaural and binaural hearing aids. Arch Otolaryng (Chic.) 1958; 67: 606
- Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York 1956
- Tonning F.-M. Directional audiometry. I. Directional white-noise audiometry. Acta Otolaryng (Stockh.) 1970; 69: 388
- Tonning F.-M. Directional audiometry. II. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech. Acta Otolaryng (Stockh.) 1971b; 72: 352
- Tonning F.-M. Directional audiometry. III. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech in patients with monaural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryng (Stockh.) 1971b; 72: 404
- Tonning F.-M. a. Directional audiometry. IV. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech in aided and unaided patients with monaural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryng (Stockh.) 1972; 73: 44
- Tonning F.-M. Directional audiometry. V. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech in patients with monaural hearing loss treated with hearing aids (CROS). Acta Otolaryng (Stockh.) 1972b; 74: 37
- Tonning F.-M. c. Directional audiometry. VI. Directional speech audiometry in patients with practical deafness in one ear and impaired hearing in the other ear treated with hearing aids. Acta Otolaryng (Stockh.) 1972; 74: 206
- Watson N. A. Hearing aids: Uniform and selective: Monaural, diotic and binaural; Air and bone conduction. J Acoust Soc Amer 1942; 13: 335
- Whetnall E. Binaural hearing. J Laryng 1964; 78: 1079
- Whittle L. S., Delany M. E. Equivalent threshold sound-pressure levels for the TDH 39/ MX41-AR earphone. J Acoust Soc Amer 1966; 39: 1187
- Wright H. N., Carhart R. The efficiency of binaural listening among the hearing-impaired. Arch Otolaryng (Chic.) 1960; 72: 109