Evoked Potential Correlates of Genetic Progressive Hearing Loss:Age-related Changes from the Ear to the Inferior Colliculus ofC57BL/6 and CBA/J Mice

Reference

• Aran J.-M. Clinical measures of VIIIth nerve function. Adv Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 1973; 20: 374
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aran J.-M., Le Bert G. Les résponses nerveuses cochléaires chez 1'homme, image du fonctionnement de ľoreille et nouveau test ďaudiométrie objective. Rev Laryng Otol Thinol (Bord) 1968; 89: 361
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergholtz L. M., Hooper R. E., Mehta D. C. Electrocochleographic response patterns in a group of patients mainly with presbyacusis. Scand Audiol 1977; 6: 3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Birch L. M., Warfield D., Ruben R. J., Mikaelian D. O. Behavioral measurements of pure tone thresholds in normal CBA-J mice. J And Res 1968; 8: 459
   Google Scholar
• Bredberg G. Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1968; 22, Suppl.236
   Google Scholar
• Buchwald J. S., Huang C.-M. Far-field acoustic response: Origins in the cat. Science 1975; 189: 382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats A. C., Martin J. L. Human auditory nerve action potentials and brainstem evoked responses: Effects of audiogram shape and lesion location. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley D. E., Schramm V. L., Swain R. E., Maisel R. H., Rauchbach E., Swanson S. N. An animal model for presbycusis. Laryngoscope 1972a; 83: 2079
   Google Scholar
• Crowley D. E., Swain R. E., Schramm V. L., Swanson S. N. Analysis of age-related changes in electric responses from the inner ear of rats. Ann Otol 1972b; 811: 119
   Google Scholar
• Dublin W. B. Fundamentals of Sensorineural Auditory Pathology. Ch. C. Thomas, Springfield, I11 1976
   Google Scholar
• Eggermont J. J. Electrocochleography. In Auditory System, W. D. Keidel, W. D. Neff. Springer-Verlag, New York 1976
   Google Scholar
• Eggermont J. J., Odenthal D. W. Action potentials and summating potentials in the normal human cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1974; 39, Suppl. 316
   Google Scholar
• Elberling C., Salomon G. Action potentials from pathological ears compared to potentials generated by a computer model. Electrocochleography, R. J. Ruben, C. Elberling, G. Salomon. University Park, Baltimore 1976; 439
   Google Scholar
• Evans E. F. The sharpening of cochlear frequency sensitivity in the normal and abnormal cochlea. Au-diology 1975; 14: 419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finck A., Berlin C. I. Comparison between single unit responses in the auditory nerve and GSR determined thresholds in mice. J Aud Res 1965; 5: 1
   Google Scholar
• Fisch L. The selective and differential vulnerability of the auditory system. Sensorineural Hearing Loss, G. E. Wolstenholme, J. Knight. Churchill, London 1970; 101
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins J. E., Jr. Comparative Otopathology: Aging, noise, and ototoxic drugs. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1973; 20: 125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jewett D. L. Volume-conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1970; 28: 609
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jewett D. L., Romano M. N. Neonatal development of auditory system potentials averaged from the scalp of rat and cat. Brain Res 1972; 36: 101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konigsmark B. W., Gorlin R. J. Genetic and Metabolic Deafness. Saunders, Philadelphia 1976
   Google Scholar
• Mikaelian D. O. Single unit study of the cochlear nucleus in the mouse. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1966; 62: 545
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mikaelian D., Alford B. R., Ruben R. J. Cochlear potentials and VIII nerve action potentials in normal and genetically deaf mice. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryn-gol 1965; 74: 146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikaelian D. O., Warfield D., Norris O. Genetic progressive hearing loss in the C57/M6 mouse. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1974; 77: 327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlonyeni M. The late stages of the development of the primary cochlear nuclei in mice. Brain Res 1967; 4: 334
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paparella M. M., Hanson D. G., Rao K. N., Ulvestadt R. Genetic sensorineural deafness in adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1975; 84: 459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestalozza G., Davis H., Eldredge D. H., Covell W. P., Rogers J. B. Decreased bio-electric potentials in the ears of senile guinea pigs. Laryngoscope 1957; 67: 1113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plantz R. G., Williston J. S., Jewett D. L. 1974
   Google Scholar
• Spatio-temporal distribution of auditory-evoked far field potentials in rat and cat. Brain Res, 68: 55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuknecht H. F. Pathology of the Ear. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge 1974
   Google Scholar
• Sher A. E. The embryonic and postnatal development of the inner ear of the mouse. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1971; 1, Suppl. 285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohmer H., Feinmesser M. Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1967; 76: 111
   Google Scholar
• Sohmer H., Pratt H. Electrocochleography during noise-induced temporary threshold shifts. Audiology 1975; 14: 130
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster D. B., Webster M. Neonatal sound deprivation affects brain stem auditory nuclei. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshie N. Auditory nerve action potential responses to clicks in man. Laryngoscope 1968; 78: 198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshie N. Diagnostic significance of the electro-cochleogram in clinical audiometry. Audiology 1973; 12: 504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshie N., Ohashi T., Suzuki T. Nonsurgical recording of auditory nerve action potentials in man. Laryngoscope 1967; 77: 76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar