References
- Buechner A, Bynon A, Szyfter W, Niemczyk K, Hoppe U, Hey M, et al. Clinical Evaluation of cochlear implant sound coding taking into account conjectural masking function. MP3000TM. Cochlear Implants Int 2011;12:194–204.
- Nogueira W, Buechner A, Lenarz T, Edler B. A psychoacoustic “NofM”-type speech coding strategy for cochlear implants. EURASIP J Appl Signal Process 2005;18:3044–59.
- Guoping L, Lutman ME. 2008. Sparse coding for cochlear implants. 16th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) in Lausanne, Switzerland. Available from URL:http://www.eurasip.org/Proceedings/Eusipco/Eusipco2008/ papers/1569104289.pdf.
- Brendel M, Frohne-Buechner C, Stoever T, Lenarz T, Buechner A. Investigation of pitch discrimination and the effect of learning for virtual channels realized by current steering. Acta Otolaryngol 2009;129:1425–33.
- Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Zerbi M, Finley CC. 1992. Speech processors for auditory prostheses: virtual channel interleaved sampling (VCIS) processors – initial studies with subject SR2. First Quarterly Progress Report, NIH project N01-DC-2-2401.
- Buechner A, Brendel M, Krueger B, Frohne-Buechner C, Nogueira W, Edler B, et al. Current steering and results from novel speech coding strategies. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:203–7.
- Busby P, Plant KL. Dual electrode stimulation using the Nucleus CI24RE cochlear implant: electrode impedance and pitch ranking studies. Ear Hear 2005;26:504–11.
- Firszt JB, Koch DB, Downing M, Litvak L. Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:629–36.
- Townshend B, Cotter N, van Compernolle D, White RL. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987;82:106–15.
- Kwon BJ, van den Honert C. Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 2006;120:EL1–6.
- McKay CM, Vandali AE, McDermott HJ, Clark GM. Speech processing for multichannel cochlear implants: variations of the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor strategy. Acta Otolaryngol 1994;114:52–8.
- Frijns JHM, Kalkman RK, Vanpoucke FJ, Bongers JS, Briaire JJ. Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: evidence for two neural response modalities. Acta Otolaryngol 2009;129:433–9.
- Hanekom JJ, Shannon RV. Place pitch discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. S Afr J Commun Disord 1996;43:27–40.
- Kollmeier B, Lenarz T, Winkler A, Zokoll MA, Sukowski H, Brand T, et al. Hoergeraeteindikation und –ueberpruefung nach modernen Verfahren der Sprachaudiometrie im Deutschen. HNO 2011;59:1012–21.
- Javel E, Shepherd RK. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hear Res 2000;140:45–76.
- Javel E, Viemeister NF. Stochastic properties of cat auditory nerve responses to electric and acoustic stimuli and application to intensity discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;107:908–21.
- Swanson B, Dawson P, McDermott H. Investigating cochlear implant place-pitch perception with the Modified Melodies test. Cochlear Implants Int 2009;10:100–4.
- Donaldson GS, Dawson PK, Borden LZ. Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity. Ear Hear 2011;32:238–50.
- Battmer RD, Pesch J, Buechner A, Lenarz T. Speech perception with different stimulation rates & coding strategies using the Nucleus Freedom system. 10th International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Other Implantable Auditory Technologies, San Diego, 2008.
- Buechner A, Frohne-Buechner C, Gaertner L, Stoever T, Battmer RD, Lenarz T. The Advanced Bionics High Resolution Mode: stimulation rates up to 5000 pps. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:114–23.