1,599
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Imaging cochlear implantation with round window insertion in human temporal bones and cochlear morphological variation using high-resolution cone beam CT

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 466-472 | Received 20 Oct 2014, Accepted 17 Nov 2014, Published online: 13 Feb 2015

References

  • HWHusstedt, AAschendorff, BRichter, RLaszig, MSchumacher. Nondestructive three-dimensional analysis of electrode to modiolus proximity. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:49–52.
  • RGupta, SHBartling, SKBasu, WRRoss, HBecker, APfoh, et al. Experimental flat-panel high-spatial-resolution volume CT of the temporal bone. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1417–24.
  • MSPearl, ARoy, CJLimb. High-resolution secondary reconstructions with the use of flat panel CT in the clinical assessment of patients with cochlear implants. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1202–8.
  • BMVerbist, JHFrijns, JGeleijns, MAvan Buchem. Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:424–9.
  • SHelbig, MMack, BSchell, TBratzke H Stover, MHelbig. Scalar localization by computed tomography of cochlear implant electrode carriers designed for deep insertion. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:745–50.
  • EErixon, HRask-Andersen. How to predict cochlear length before cochlear implantation surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 2013;133:1258–65.
  • BEscude, CJames, ODeguine, NCochard, EEter, BFraysse. The size of the cochlea and predictions of insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes. Audiol Neurootol 2006;11:27–33.
  • GNEsquia Medina, SBorel, YNguyen, EAmbert-Dahan, EFerrary, OSterkers, et al. Is electrode-modiolus distance a prognostic factor for hearing performances after cochlear implant surgery? Audiol Neurootol 2013;18:406–13.
  • IHochmair, WArnold, PNopp, CJolly, JMuller, PRoland. Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123:612–17.
  • TStruffert, VHertel, YKyriakou, JKrause, TEngelhorn, BSchick, et al. Imaging of cochlear implant electrode array with flat-detector CT and conventional multislice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:443–52.
  • ATrieger, ASchulze, MSchneider, TZahnert, DMurbe. In vivo measurements of the insertion depth of cochlear implant arrays using flat-panel volume computed tomography. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:152–7.
  • CGuldner, SWiegand, RWeiss, SBien, ASesterhenn, ATeymoortash, et al. Artifacts of the electrode in cochlea implantation and limits in analysis of deep insertion in cone beam tomography (CBT). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269:767–72.
  • FYang, RJacobs, GWillems. Dental age estimation through volume matching of teeth imaged by cone-beam CT. Forensic Sci Int 2006;159:S78–83.
  • EAvci, TNauwelaers, TLenarz, VHamacher, AKral. Variations in microanatomy of the human cochlea. J Comp Neurol 2014;522:3245–61.
  • Medel. 2013. Electrode arrays designed for atraumatic implantation providing superior hearing performance. Available at http://www.medel.com/data/pdf/21617.pdf.