Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Oto-Laryngologica Volume 136, 2016 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
308
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Validation of the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19) to assess Spanish-speaking cochlear implant users’ auditory abilities in everyday communication situations

Miryam CalvinoDepartment of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
,
Javier GavilánDepartment of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
,
Isabel Sánchez-CuadradoDepartment of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
,
Rosa M. Pérez-MoraDepartment of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
,
Elena MuñozDepartment of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
&
Luis LassalettaDepartment of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ Research Institute, Madrid, SpainCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 48-55 | Received 19 Jun 2015, Accepted 11 Aug 2015, Published online: 25 Sep 2015

References

  • Lenarz M, Sonmez H, Joseph G, Buchner A, Lenarz T. Long-term performance of cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;147:112–18.
  • Tavora-Vieira D, Marino R, Acharya A, Rajan GP. The impact of cochlear implantation on speech understanding, subjective hearing performance, and tinnitus perception in patients with unilateral severe to profound hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:430–6.
  • Lachowska M, Pastuszka A, Glinka P, Niemczyk K. Benefits of cochlear implantation in deafened adults. Audiol Neurootol 2014;19(Suppl 1):40–4.
  • Ramos A, Guerra-Jimenez G, Rodriguez C, Borkoski S, Falcon JC, Perez D. Cochlear implants in adults over 60: a study of communicative benefits and the impact on quality of life. Cochlear Implants Int 2013;14:241–5.
  • Ariel Moctezuma JT. An overview of cochlear implant systems. Urbana-Champaign, IL: BIOE, University of Illinois; 2011.
  • Zhao F, Bai Z, Stephens D. The relationship between changes in self–rated quality of life after cochlear implantation and changes in individual complaints. Clin Otolaryngol 2008;33:427–34.
  • Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ 2011;2:53–5.
  • Amann E, Anderson I. Development and validation of a questionnaire for hearing implant users to self-assess their auditory abilities in everyday communication situations: the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19). Acta Otolaryngol 2014;134:915–23.
  • Cárdenas de MR, Marrero V. Cuaderno de Logoaudiometría: Cuadernos de la Universidad de Educación a Distancia. Simancas Ed; 1994.
  • Everitt B. The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
  • Kaiser H, Rice J. Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educ Psychol Meas 1974;34:111–17.
  • Lassaletta L, Calvino M, Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Perez-Mora RM, Munoz E, Gavilan J. Pros and cons of round window vibroplasty in open cavities: audiological, surgical, and quality of life outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:944–52.
  • Mertens G, Hofkens A, Punte AK, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:51–60.
  • Damen GW, Beynon AJ, Krabbe PF, Mulder JJ, Mylanus EA. Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: long-term follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136:597–604.
  • Fuller C, Free R, Maat B, Baskent D. Musical background not associated with self-perceived hearing performance or speech perception in postlingual cochlear-implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 2012;132:1009–16.
  • Hirschfelder A, Grabel S, Olze H. The impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life: the role of audiologic performance and variables. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:357–62.
  • Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P. Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:756–65.
  • Klop WM, Boermans PP, Ferrier MB, van den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM, Frijns JH. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:615–21.
  • Sladen DP, Zappler A. Older and younger adult cochlear implant users: speech recognition in quiet and noise, quality of life, and music perception. Am J Audiol 2015;24:31–9.
  • Deguine O, Garcia de Quevedo S, Fraysse B, Cormary X, Uziel A, Demonet JF. Criteria for selecting the side for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:403–6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.