References
- Morton CC, Nance WE. Newborn hearing screening-a silent revolution. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2151–64.
- Li Q, Fang R, Huang D, Wang G, Liu X, Dai P. Comparative analysis of the recurrent mutations between Uigur and Han ethnic deaf group in Xinjiang region of China. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;24:11–5.
- Alsina B, Giraldez F, Pujades C. Patterning and cell fate in ear development. Int J Dev Biol 2009;267:119–34.
- Kiernan AE, Pelling AL, Leung KK, Tang AS, Bell DM, Tease C, et al. Sox2 is required for sensory organ development in the mammalian inner ear. Nature 2005;434:1031–5.
- Fritzsch B, Jahan I, Pan N, Kersigo J, Duncan J, Kopecky B. Dissecting the molecular basis of organ of Corti development: Where are we now? Hear Res 2011;276:16–26.
- Groves AK, Fekete DM. Shaping sound in space: the regulation of inner ear patterning. Development 2012;139:245–57.
- Buganim Y, Faddah DA, Cheng AW, Itskovich E, Markoulaki S, Ganz K, et al. Single-cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase. Cell 2012;150:1209–22.
- Neves J, Uchikawa M, Bigas A, Giraldez F. The prosensory function of Sox2 in the chicken inner ear relies on the direct regulation of Atoh1. PLoS One 2012;7:30871
- Ma Q, Chen Z, del Barco Barrantes I, de la Pompa JL, Anderson DJ. Neurogenin1 is essential for the determination of neuronal precursors for proximal cranial sensory ganglia. Neuron 1998;20:469–82.
- Ma Q, Anderson DJ, Fritzsch B. Neurogenin 1 null mutant ears develop fewer, morphologically normal hair cells in smaller sensory epithelia devoid of innervation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2000;1:129–43.
- Kim WY, Fritzsch B, Serls A, Bakel LA, Huang EJ, Reichadt LF, et al. NeuroD-null mice are deaf due to a severe loss of the inner ear sensory neurons during development. Development 2001;128:417–26.
- Adam J, Myat A, Le Roux I, Eddison M, Henrique D, Ish-Horowicz D, et al. Cell fate choices and the expression of Notch, Delta and Serrate homologues in the chick inner ear: parallels with Drosophila sense-organ development. Development 1998;125:4645–54.
- Sennaroglu L, Saatci I A new classification for cochleovestibular malformations. Laryngoscope 2002;112:2230–41.
- Neves J, Vachkov I, Giraldez FF. Sox2 regulation of hair cell development: incoherence makes sense. Hear Res 2012;297:20–9.
- Parada C, Chamizo M, Giraldez F. Jagged 1 regulates the restriction of Sox2 expression in the developing chicken inner ear: a mechanism for sensory organ specification. Development 2011;138:735–44.
- Neves J, Kamaid A, Alsina B, Giraldez F. Differential expression of Sox2 and Sox3 in neuronal and sensory progenitors of the developing inner ear of the chick. J Comp Neurol 2007;503:487–500.
- Oesterle EC, Campbell S, Taylor RR, Forge A, Hume CR, et al. Sox2 and JAGGED1 expression in normal and drug-damaged adult mouse inner ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2008;9:65–89.
- Raft S, Koundakjian EJ, Quinones H, Jayasena CS, Goodrich LV, Johnson JE, et al. Cross-regulation of Ngn1 and Math1 coordinates the production of neurons and sensory hair cells during inner ear development. Development 2007;134:4405–15.
- Kelberman D, Rizzoti K, Avilion A, Bitner-Glindzicz M, Cianfarani S, Collins J, et al. Mutations within Sox2/SOX2 are associated with abnormalities in the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis in mice and humans. J Clin Invest 2006;116:2442–55.
- Williamson KA, Hever AM, Rainger J, Rogers RC, Magee A, Fidler Z, et al. Mutations in SOX2 cause anophthalmia-esophageal-genital (AEG) syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006;15:1413–22.