1,694
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Frequency-dependent loudness balancing in bimodal cochlear implant users

, , , &
Pages 775-781 | Received 22 Dec 2015, Accepted 12 Feb 2016, Published online: 17 Mar 2016

References

  • Ching TY, van Wanrooy E, Dillon H. Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review. Trends Amplif 2007;11:161–92.
  • Straatman LV, Rietveld AC, Beijen J, Mylanus EA, Mens LH. Advantage of bimodal fitting in prosody perception for children using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid. J Acoust Soc Am 2010;128:1884–95.
  • Litovsky RY, Johnstone PM, Godar SP. Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children. Int J Audiol 2006;45:S78–91.
  • Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Wilson BS, Witt S, Preece JP, Noble W. Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization. Ear Hear 2002;23:98–105.
  • Francart T, McDermott H. Speech perception and localisation with SCORE bimodal: a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation. PLoS One 2012;7:e45385.
  • Dorman MF, Loizou P, Wang S, Zhang T, Spahr A, Loiselle L, et al. Bimodal cochlear implants: the role of acoustic signal level in determining speech perception benefit. Audiol Neurootol 2014;19:234–8.
  • Blamey PJ, Dooley GJ, James CJ, Parisi ES. Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing. Ear Hear 2000;21:6–17.
  • Hoth S. Indication for the need of flexible and frequency specific mapping functions in cochlear implant speech processors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007;264:129–38.
  • Ching TY, Psarros C, Hill M, Dillon H, Incerti P. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? Ear Hear 2001;22:365–80.
  • EHIMA. European Hearing Instrument Manufacturers Association wwwehimacom/ehima2. Retrieved 17 April, 2013.
  • Phonak. Adaptive Phonak Digital (APD). https://wwwphonakprocom/content/dam/phonak/gc_hq/b2b/en/evidence/compendium/Compendium_No4_Adaptive_Phonak_Digitalpdf. 2013.
  • Chalupper J, Agrawal S, Fredelake S, Spahr T. Rationale and Implementation of a Bimodal Fitting Formula. Figshare: http://dxdoiorg/106084/m9figshare1340020. 2015.
  • Bosman AJ, Smoorenburg GF. Woordenlijst voor spraakaudiometrie [compact disc]. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Audiologie. Doesburg NL: Electro Medical Instruments b.v. & Gouda NL: Veenhuis Medical Audio b.v. 1992.
  • Studebaker GA. A “rationalized” arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res 1985;28:455–62.
  • van Wieringen A, Wouters J. LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands. Int J Audiol 2008;47:348–55.
  • Gatehouse S, Noble W. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 2004;43:85–99.
  • Moore BC. Dead regions in the cochlea: conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications. Ear Hear 2004;25:98–116.
  • Reiss LA, Turner CW, Karsten SA, Gantz BJ. Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation. Neuroscience 2014;256:43–52.
  • Dunn CC, Tyler RS, Witt SA. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005;48:668–80.
  • Oxenham AJ, Kreft HA. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing. Trends Hear 2014 Oct 13;18:pii: 2331216514553783.