Reference
- Ansa LM. Verbesserung der Frequenzspezifität niedeifrequenler Stimuli zur Schwellenbestimmung in der BERA. Dissertation., Münster 1988
- Bappert E, Hoke M, Lütkenhöner B, Niestroj B. Intensity dependence of the compound action potential and the deconvolution technique. Scand Audiol 1980; 45–57, Suppl 11
- Coats A. C., Martin J. L., Kidder HR. Normal short-latency electrophysiological filtered click responses recorded from vertex and external auditory meatus. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 65: 747–58
- Davis H. Principles of electric response audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976, Suppl 28
- Debruyene F. Frequency specificity and on-effect in brain stem electric response audiometry. Am J Otolaryngol 1982; 11: 267–70
- Don M, Eggermont JJ. Analysis of the click-evoked brain stem potentials in man using high-pass noise masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 1084–92
- Don M, Eggermont J. J., Brackmann DE. Reconstruction of the audiogram using brain stem responses and high-pass noise masking. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979; 1–20, Suppl 57
- Eggermont J. J., Don M. Analysis of the click-evoked brain stem potentials in man using high-pass noise masking. II. Effect of click intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 1671–5
- Elberling C. Deconvolution of action potentials recorded from the ear canal in man. Eleetrocochleography., R. J. Ruben, C Elberling, G Salomon. University Park Press., Baltimore 1976; 151–68
- Elberling C. Compound impulse responses for the brain stem derived through combinations of cochlear and brainstem recordings. Scand Audiol 1978; 7: 147–58
- Elberling C, Hoke M. Decoding of human compound action potentials. Scand Audiol 1978; 7: 171–5
- Evans E. E., Elberling C. Location-specific components of the gross cochlear action potential. An assessment of the validity of the high-pass masking technique by cochlear nerve fibre recording in cat. Audiology 1982; 21: 204–27
- Gabor D. Acoustical quanta and the theory of hearing. Nature 1947; 159: 591–4
- Hoke M, Elberling C, Hieke D, Bappert E. Deconvolution of the compound PST histogram. Scand Audiol 1979; 141–66, Suppl 9
- Hoke M, Lütkenhöner B, Wickesberg R. Verschärfung der Frequenzspezifität durch Nachver-deckung und Adaptation bei Stimulation mit Pulsserien absteigender Trägerfrequenz in der BERA (Brain-stem Evoked Response Audiometry). Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1984a; 237–40, Suppl 11
- Hoke M, Ross B, Wickesberg R, Lütkenhöner B. Weighted averaging—theory and application to electric response audiometry. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1984b; 57: 484–9
- Klein A. I., Teas DC. Acoustically dependent latency shift of BSER (wave V) in man. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 1887–95
- Kodera K, Yamane H, Yamada O, Suzuki JI. Brain stem response audiometry at speech frequencies. Audiology 1977; 16: 469–79
- Kramer S. J., Teas DC. BSR (wave V) and N1 latencies in response to acoustic stimuli with different bandwidths. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 66: 446–55
- Lütkenhöner B, Hoke M, Pantev C. Possibilities and limitations of weighted averaging. Biol Cybern 1985; 52: 409–16
- Pantev C, Lagidze S, Pantev M, Kevanishvili Z. Frequency-specific contributions to the auditory brain stem response derived by means of pure-tone masking. Audiology 1985; 24: 275–87
- Parker D. J., Thornton A. RD. The validity of the derived cochlear nerve and brainstem evoked response of the human auditory system. Scand Audiol 1978; 7: 45–52
- Picton T. W., Onellette J, Hamel G, Durieux-Smith A. Brainstem evoked potentials to tonepips in notched noise. J Otolaryngol 1979; 8: 289–314
- Prijs VF. Single-unit responses at the round window of the guinea pig. Hear Res 1986; 21: 127–33
- Stapells DR. Auditory EP thresholds. PhD Thesis, Ottawa 1984
- Suzuki T, Hirai Y, Hiriuchi K. Auditory brain stem responses to pure tone stimuli. Scand Audiol 1977; 6: 51–56
- Teas D. C., Eldredge D. A., Davis H. Cochlear responses to acoustic transients. An interpretation of whole-nerve action potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 1962; 34: 1438–59
- Terkildsen K, Osterhammel P, Huis in't Velt F. Farfield eleetrocochleography. Frequency selectivity of the response. Scand Audiol 1975; 4: 167–72