References
- Meyer W. On adenoid vegetations in the nasopharyngeal cavity: their pathology, diagnosis and treatment. Med Chir Trans 1870; 53: 191–215
- Belenky W M. Nasal Obstruction and rhinorrhoea. Pediatric otolaryngology, C. D. Bluestone. Saunders, Philadelphia 1990; Vol. 1.: 657–71
- Schechtman F G. Office evaluation of pediatric upper airway obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 1992; 25: 857–65
- Drake-Lee A B. The catarrhal child. Scott-Brown's otolaryngology, J NG Evans. Butterworths, London 1987; Vol. 6.: 280–90
- Maw A R, Jeans W D, Fernando D CJ. Inter-observer variability in the clinical and radiological assessment of adenoid size, and the correlation with adenoid volume. Clin Otolaryngol 1981; 6: 317–22
- Phelps P D, Stansbie J M. Clinical ENT radiology. Butterworth-Heinemann. Oxford 1993; 133–4
- Hibbert J, Tweedie M CK. The value of signs and symptoms in the diagnosis of enlarged adenoids. Clin Otolaryngol 1977; 2: 297–304
- Hibbert J. The current status of adenoidectomy: a survey among otolaryngologists. Clin Otolaryngol 1977; 2: 239–47
- Stoksted P. Rhinometric examinations of schoolchildren with adenoid vegetations. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1951; 39: 44–55
- Berdel D, Gast R, Huber B. The simplified oscillation method for measuring nasal resistance during provocation with allergens. Clin Allergy 1981; 11: 385–93
- Parker A J, Maw A R, Szallasi F. An objective method of assessing nasality: a possible aid in the selection of patients for adenoidcctomy. Clin Otolaryngol 1989; 14: 161–6
- Slawinski E B. Dubanowicz-Kossowska E. The assessment of hypertrophy of nasopharyngcal tonsil by acoustical methods. Int J Paediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 27: 229–44
- Lenders H, Scholl R, Brunner M. Akustische Rhinometrie: das Fledcrmausprinzip in der Nasc. HNO 1992; 40: 239–47
- Elbrond O, Hilberg O, Felding J U, Blegvad Andersen O. Acoustic rhinomett-y. used as a method to demonstrate changes in the volume of the nasopharynx after adenoidectomy. Clin Otolaryngol 1991; 16: 84–6
- Hilberg O, Jensen F T, Pedersen O F. Nasal airway geometry: comparison between acoustic reflections and magnetic resonance scanning. J Appl Physiol 1993; 75: 2811–19
- Hilberg O, Jackson A C, Swift D L, Pcderscn O F. Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity gcometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 1989; 66: 295–303
- Altman D G. Logistic regression. Practical statisties for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London 1991; 351–8
- Altman D G. Method comparison studies. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London 1991; 396–403
- Lenders H, Pirsig W. Diagnostic value of acoustic rhinometry: patients with allergic and vasomotor rhinitis compared to normal controls. Rhinology 1990; 28: 5–16
- Fisher E W, Lund V J, Scadding G K. Acoustic rhinometry in rhinological practice: discussion paper. J Roy Soc Med 1994; 87: 411–3
- Terheyeden H, Wellbrock M, Mertens J. Acoustic rhinometry: verification of the accuracy by three-dimensional CT-reconstruction of human upper airways. Abstract book of XIV Congress of European Rhinologic Society and XIII International Symposium on Infection and Allergy of the Nose., M Tos. TD Grafik, Denmark, Copenhagen 1994; 235
- Pedersen O F, Hilberg O. Acoustic rhinometry. What is measured?. Abstract book of XIV Congress of European Rhinologic Society and XIII International Symposium on Infection and Allergy of the Nose., M Tos. TD Grafik, Copenhagen 1994; 60
- Riechelmann H, Rheinheimer M C, Wolfensberger M. Acoustic rhinometry in pre-school children. Clin Oto-laryngol 1993; 18: 272–7
- Mayhew T H, O'Flynn P. Validation of acoustic rhinometry by using the Cavallieri principle to estimate nasal cavity volume in cadavers. Clin Otolaryngol 1993; 18: 220–5
- Sorensen H, Solow B, Greve E. Assessment of the nasopharyngeal airway. A rhinomanometric and radiographic study in children with adenoids. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1980; 89: 227–32