References
- Warren E H, Liberman MC. Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. II Dependenceon stimulus variables. Hear Res 1989; 37: 105–22
- Liberman MC. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound. Hear Res 1989; 38: 47–56
- Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechani-cal properties in human subjects: Dependence on stimulus variables. J Neurophysiol 1991; 65: 724–35
- Moulin A, Collet L, Duclaux R. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans. Hear Res 1993; 65: 193–210
- Warren E H, Liberman MC. Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. I. Contributions of cochlear efferents. Hear Res 1989; 37: 89–104
- Guinan J J, Warr W B, Norris BE. Differential olivocochlear projections from lateral vs. medial zones of the superior olivary complex. J Comp Neurol 1983; 221: 358–70
- Dolan D F, Nuttall AL. Basilar membrane responses to signals in the presence of noise and efferent activation. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr, Eighteenth Midwinter Meeting 1995; 114
- Liberman M C, Brown MC. Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat. Hear Res 1986; 24: 17–36
- Rajan R. Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. I Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters. J Neurophysiol 1988; 60: 549–67
- Rajan R. Functions of the efferent pathways to the mammalian cochlea. Information processing in mammalian auditory and tactile systems., M Rowe, L Aitkin. Wiley Liss, New York 1990; 81–96
- Mountain DC. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science 1980; 210: 71–2
- Bonfils P, Puel J-L. Functional properties of the crossed part of the medial olivo-cochlear bundle. Hear Res 1987; 28: 125–30
- Berlin C I, Hood L J, Hurley A E, Wen H, Kemp DT. Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacous-tic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Hear Res 1995, in press
- Lind O. Contralateral suppression of TEOAE. Attempts to find a latency. Br J Audiology 1994; 28: 219–25
- Berlin C I, Hood L J, Wen H, Szabo P, Cecola R P, Rigby P, Jackson DF. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993; 71: 1–11
- Froehlich P, Collet L, Morgon A. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission amplitudes change with changes of directed attention. Physiology & Behavior 1993; 53: 679–82
- Metz O. Studies on the contraction of the tympanic muscles as indicated by changes in the impedance of the ear. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1951; 39: 397–405
- Fisch U, Schulthess Gv. Electromyographic studies on the human stapedial muscle. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1963; 56: 287–97
- Collet L, Kemp P T, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 1990; 43: 251–62
- Brown MC. Morphology and response properties of single olivocochlear fibers in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1989; 40: 93–110
- Tavartkiladze G A, Gl Frolenkov, Kruglov A V, Arta-Masov SV. Ipsilateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission. Br J Audiology 1994; 28: 193–204
- Gobsch H, Kevanishvili Z, Gamgebeli Z, Gvelesiani T. Behaviour of delayed evoked otoacoustic emission under forward masking paradigm. ScandAudiol 1992; 21: 143–8
- Fex J. Auditory activity in centrifugal and centripetal cochlear fibers in cat. Acta Physiol Scand 1962; 55: 2–68, Suppl 189
- Fex J. Auditory activity in uncrossed centrifugal cochlear fibers in cat. Acta Physiol Scand 1965; 64: 43–57