39
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Latency of Contralateral Sound-evoked Auditory Efferent Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions

, &
Pages 343-351 | Received 16 Apr 1996, Accepted 02 Sep 1996, Published online: 08 Jul 2009

References

  • Liberman M C. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs binaural stimulation and the effects of noise. J Neurophysiol 1988; 60: 1779–98
  • Galambos R. Suppression of auditory nerve activity by stimulation of efferent fibers to the cochlea. J Neurophysiol 1956; 19: 424–37
  • Desmedt J E. Auditory evoked potentials from cochlea to cortex as influenced by activation of the efferent olivo-cochlear bundle. J Acoust Soc Am 1962; 34: 1478–96
  • Buno W. Auditory nerve fiber activity influenced by contralateral ear sound stimulation. Exp Neurol 1978; 59: 62–74
  • Warren E H, Liberman M C. Effects of contralateral sound on auditory nerve responses. I. Contributions of cochlear efferents. Hear Res 1989; 37: 89–104
  • Prasher D K, Gibson W PR. Paradoxical reduction in AP amplitude on binaural stimulation. Evoked potentials, II, RH Nodar, C Barber. Butterworth, Minneapolis 1984; 157–62
  • Folsom R C, Owsley R. Nl action potentials in humans–influence of simultaneous contralateral stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1987; 103: 262–5
  • Collet L, Kemp D T, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 1990; 43: 251–62
  • Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R. Effect of contralateral auditory stimulation on active cochlear micromechani-cal properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J Neurophysiol 1991; 65: 724–35
  • Williams E A, Brookes G, Prasher D K. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on OAE following vestibular neurectomy. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 197–203
  • Wiederhold M L, Kiang N YS. Effects of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivo-cochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 48: 950–65
  • Fex J. Auditory activity in centrifugal and centripetal cochlear fibers in cat. Acta Physiol Scand (Suppl 189) 1962; 55: 1–68
  • Cody A R, Johnstone B M. Acoustically evoked activity of single efferent neurons in the guinea pig cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 280–2
  • Liberman M C, Brown M C. Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat. Hear Res 1986; 24: 17–36
  • Gummer M, Yates G K, Johnstone B M. Modulation transfer function of efferent neurones in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 1988; 36: 41–52
  • Fex J. Efferent inhibition in the cochlea related to hair-cell dc activity: study of postsynaptic activity of the crossed olivocochlear fibres in the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1967; 41: 666–75
  • Konishi T, Slepian J Z. Effects of the electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on cochlear potentials recorded with intracochlear electrodes in guinea pigs. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49: 1762–9
  • Lind O. Contralateral suppression of TEOAE. Attempts to find a latency. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 219–25
  • Brown M C, Nuttall A L. Efferent control of cochlear inner hair cell responses in the guinea-pig. J Physiol 1984; 354: 625–46
  • Prasher D K, Cohen M. Effectiveness of acoustic reflex threshold criteria in the diagnosis of retrocochlear pathology. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 11–18
  • Veuillet E, Collet L, Morgon A. Differential effects of ear-canal pressure and contralateral acoustic stimulation on evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear Res 1992; 61: 47–55
  • Berlin C I, Hood L J, Wen H, Szabo P, Cecola R P, Rigby P, Jackson D F. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993; 71: 1–11
  • Rajan R. Protective functions of the efferent pathways to the mammalian cochlea: a review. Noise-induced hearing loss, AL Dancer, D Henderson, RJ Salvi, RP Hamerrik. Mosby Year Book, St Louis 1992; 429–44
  • Froehlich P, Collet L, Morgon A. Transiently evoked otoacoustic emission amplitudes change with changes of directed attention. Physiol Behav 1993; 53: 679–82

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.